Markov-chain Monte Carlo estimation of aquifer parameters, non-linear well losses, and probable costs of water extraction

Previous studies found that best-fit parameters from variable-rate pumping tests show very high correlation between both aquifer and non-linear head loss parameters. This correlation implies non-uniqueness of parameter sets and potentially similar non-uniqueness of predicted well behavior. The resulting uncertainty may lead to a wide range of potential future pumping costs, making it difficult to evaluate how up-front investments to improve well efficiency will ultimately influence overall costs. To address this and assess how filter-pack material affects predictive pumping costs, we implement (in Python) a Bayesian sampling of the posterior distribution of aquifer and non-linear well loss parameters using Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. We also implement a novel discharge correction to account for wellbore storage that significantly changes efficiency estimation. These methods are needed to analyze a number of single-well step-drawdown tests from the city of Castle Rock, Colorado, including wells constructed with both sand and glass-bead filter packs. Some wells were constructed with the more expensive glass-bead filter packs with the intent of saving pumping costs due to higher well efficiency. The resulting parameter distributions are highly correlated and non-Gaussian. Forward simulations using an ensemble of these parameter sets, along with a cost function to predict future pumping costs weighed against initial capital costs, show that there were no statistically significant improvements to well efficiency by using glass bead filter packs. • Python freeware for Marquardt-Levenburg and Markov-Chain Monte Carlo analysis of step-drawdown tests. • Posterior probabilities of nonlinear head losses generated. • Probabilistic analysis of potential electric power saving from glass-bead (rather than gravel) filter pack. • Nonlinear head losses more closely associated with aquifer formation than filter pack material.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.134952
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Markov-chain Monte Carlo estimation of aquifer parameters, non-linear well losses, and probable costs of water extraction

Joel Barber, Savannah Miller, David A. Benson
Journal of Hydrology
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
article

Markov-chain Monte Carlo estimation of aquifer parameters, non-linear well losses, and probable costs of water extraction

Joel Barber, Savannah Miller, David A. Benson
article en

Abstract

Previous studies found that best-fit parameters from variable-rate pumping tests show very high correlation between both aquifer and non-linear head loss parameters. This correlation implies non-uniqueness of parameter sets and potentially similar non-uniqueness of predicted well behavior. The resulting uncertainty may lead to a wide range of potential future pumping costs, making it difficult to evaluate how up-front investments to improve well efficiency will ultimately influence overall costs. To address this and assess how filter-pack material affects predictive pumping costs, we implement (in Python) a Bayesian sampling of the posterior distribution of aquifer and non-linear well loss parameters using Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. We also implement a novel discharge correction to account for wellbore storage that significantly changes efficiency estimation. These methods are needed to analyze a number of single-well step-drawdown tests from the city of Castle Rock, Colorado, including wells constructed with both sand and glass-bead filter packs. Some wells were constructed with the more expensive glass-bead filter packs with the intent of saving pumping costs due to higher well efficiency. The resulting parameter distributions are highly correlated and non-Gaussian. Forward simulations using an ensemble of these parameter sets, along with a cost function to predict future pumping costs weighed against initial capital costs, show that there were no statistically significant improvements to well efficiency by using glass bead filter packs. • Python freeware for Marquardt-Levenburg and Markov-Chain Monte Carlo analysis of step-drawdown tests. • Posterior probabilities of nonlinear head losses generated. • Probabilistic analysis of potential electric power saving from glass-bead (rather than gravel) filter pack. • Nonlinear head losses more closely associated with aquifer formation than filter pack material.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 668
Colorado School of Mines (US), Westminster College - Pennsylvania (US), Oldham Council (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.