P-54. Outcomes of patients with MRSA bacteremia treated with vancomycin vs non-vancomycin agents: A tertiary care hospital retrospective review

Abstract Background MRSA bloodstream infections have a higher inpatient mortality rate compared to other bloodstream infections, constituting a significant burden to patient outcomes. Vancomycin remains the backbone treatment for MRSA bacteremia despite some studies having shown superiority or non-inferiority of other anti-MRSA agents such as daptomycin. There remains uncertainty in treating MRSA bacteremia patients as to whether vancomycin portents better outcomes compared to non-Vancomycin agents. Methods A retrospective cohort of patients with MRSA bacteremia admitted from March 2024 to April 2025 were extracted from our institution medical records. We compared various metrics associated with care and clinical outcomes for patients with a diagnosis of MRSA bacteremia who were either treated with Vancomycin (VP) vs treated with Non-Vancomycin Agents (NVP). Primary endpoint was all cause inpatient mortality. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted. Secondary end points included: requirement of ICU admission, vasopressor use, development of acute kidney injury that required hemodialysis (AKI-HD), hospitalization days since the first MRSA positive blood culture (MRSA-LoS) and time to clearance of blood cultures (TTC). To compare MRSA-LoS and TTC, a multivariate linear regression was conducted. Results A total of 88 hospitalizations during which a patient had MRSA bacteremia met the eligibility criteria. No statistically significant difference in inpatient mortality was noted (VP: 12% vs. NVP: 5.3%; p = 0.277), but Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (aOR 1.46, p=0.041) and Pitt Bacteremia Score (PBS) (aOR 2.45; p=0.007) were predictors of inpatient mortality. Treatment with Vancomycin (aOR 3.75, p=0.043) and PBS (aOR 3.12, p< 0.001) were statistically significant predictors of ICU admission (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference in vasopressor use (p=0.607), development of AKI-HD (p=0.401), MRSA-LoS (p=0.318) or TTC (p=0.906) between VP vs NVP. Conclusion Antibiotic choice vancomycin vs non-vancomycin as definitive therapy was not associated with a clear difference in inpatient mortality for the treatment of MRSA bacteremia in this retrospective analysis. Conversely, receiving Vancomycin as definitive therapy was associated with ICU admission. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.283
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-54. Outcomes of patients with MRSA bacteremia treated with vancomycin vs non-vancomycin agents: A tertiary care hospital retrospective review

Nancy Law, Nina M. Haste, Christopher B Baladad, Renato Bobadilla Leon et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

P-54. Outcomes of patients with MRSA bacteremia treated with vancomycin vs non-vancomycin agents: A tertiary care hospital retrospective review

Nancy Law, Nina M. Haste, Christopher B Baladad, Renato Bobadilla Leon, Victor Chen, Shira Abeles
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background MRSA bloodstream infections have a higher inpatient mortality rate compared to other bloodstream infections, constituting a significant burden to patient outcomes. Vancomycin remains the backbone treatment for MRSA bacteremia despite some studies having shown superiority or non-inferiority of other anti-MRSA agents such as daptomycin. There remains uncertainty in treating MRSA bacteremia patients as to whether vancomycin portents better outcomes compared to non-Vancomycin agents. Methods A retrospective cohort of patients with MRSA bacteremia admitted from March 2024 to April 2025 were extracted from our institution medical records. We compared various metrics associated with care and clinical outcomes for patients with a diagnosis of MRSA bacteremia who were either treated with Vancomycin (VP) vs treated with Non-Vancomycin Agents (NVP). Primary endpoint was all cause inpatient mortality. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted. Secondary end points included: requirement of ICU admission, vasopressor use, development of acute kidney injury that required hemodialysis (AKI-HD), hospitalization days since the first MRSA positive blood culture (MRSA-LoS) and time to clearance of blood cultures (TTC). To compare MRSA-LoS and TTC, a multivariate linear regression was conducted. Results A total of 88 hospitalizations during which a patient had MRSA bacteremia met the eligibility criteria. No statistically significant difference in inpatient mortality was noted (VP: 12% vs. NVP: 5.3%; p = 0.277), but Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (aOR 1.46, p=0.041) and Pitt Bacteremia Score (PBS) (aOR 2.45; p=0.007) were predictors of inpatient mortality. Treatment with Vancomycin (aOR 3.75, p=0.043) and PBS (aOR 3.12, p< 0.001) were statistically significant predictors of ICU admission (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference in vasopressor use (p=0.607), development of AKI-HD (p=0.401), MRSA-LoS (p=0.318) or TTC (p=0.906) between VP vs NVP. Conclusion Antibiotic choice vancomycin vs non-vancomycin as definitive therapy was not associated with a clear difference in inpatient mortality for the treatment of MRSA bacteremia in this retrospective analysis. Conversely, receiving Vancomycin as definitive therapy was associated with ICU admission. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
University of California San Diego (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.