Evaluation of Antigen Expression and Early Immune Response Following Cutaneous Suction‐Mediated DNA Delivery

ABSTRACT Suction‐based in vivo cutaneous DNA transfection is a newly developed, cost‐effective method that produces high transfection efficiency. This method has shown robust immunogenic responses following SARS‐CoV‐2 DNA vaccination in both pre‐clinical studies and clinical trials. The current work investigates suction‐based transfection and immune activation on a detailed, cellular level. The spatiotemporal patterns of antigen expression in rat skin following suction‐induced delivery of a pEGFP‐N1 plasmid and a SARS‐CoV‐2 DNA vaccine are evaluated via immunofluorescence staining, which demonstrates early and prolonged expression. The epidermis is identified as the primary location of transfection, and the transfected cells are primarily epidermal keratinocytes. Early immune response is assessed by detection of major histocompatibility complex class II‐positive (MHC‐II + ) cells following suction‐induced DNA vaccination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Therapeutics
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adtp.202500452
Primary Topic
RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Antigen Expression and Early Immune Response Following Cutaneous Suction‐Mediated DNA Delivery

David I. Shreiber, Christine C. Roberts, Jeffrey D. Zahn, Y. Park et al.
Advanced Therapeutics
RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
article

Evaluation of Antigen Expression and Early Immune Response Following Cutaneous Suction‐Mediated DNA Delivery

David I. Shreiber, Christine C. Roberts, Jeffrey D. Zahn, Y. Park, J. S. Singer, Joel N. Maslow, Sarah H. Park, Nandita Chakrabarty Jhumur, Hao Lin, Emran O. Lallow, Jerry W. Shan, Yukyung Um, Lisa K. Denzin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Suction‐based in vivo cutaneous DNA transfection is a newly developed, cost‐effective method that produces high transfection efficiency. This method has shown robust immunogenic responses following SARS‐CoV‐2 DNA vaccination in both pre‐clinical studies and clinical trials. The current work investigates suction‐based transfection and immune activation on a detailed, cellular level. The spatiotemporal patterns of antigen expression in rat skin following suction‐induced delivery of a pEGFP‐N1 plasmid and a SARS‐CoV‐2 DNA vaccine are evaluated via immunofluorescence staining, which demonstrates early and prolonged expression. The epidermis is identified as the primary location of transfection, and the transfected cells are primarily epidermal keratinocytes. Early immune response is assessed by detection of major histocompatibility complex class II‐positive (MHC‐II + ) cells following suction‐induced DNA vaccination.

Advanced TherapeuticsVol. 9(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of New Brunswick (CA), Johnson University (US), Kolon Life Science (South Korea) (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Antigen Expression and Early Immune Response Following Cutaneous Suction‐Mediated DNA Delivery — David I. Shreiber, Christine C. Roberts, et al. · Advanced Therapeutics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS