P-470. Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Disease in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Abstract Background Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Risk of IFD is variable in children with ALL, and need for antifungal prophylaxis varies. There are few epidemiologic studies of IFD in ALL patients. This study sought to define the epidemiology of IFD and evaluate use of antifungal prophylaxis in ALL.Table 1Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for those with and without IFD in the cohortTable 2Incidence and incidence-rates of ifD Methods This was a retrospective study of patients with de novo ALL treated at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center from 1/1/2012-12/31/2022. Clinical and microbiology data was abstracted from the medical record. Proven and probable IFD was identified using MSG/EORTC definitions. The incidence and incidence-rates of IFD were calculated. Days of antifungal therapy were collected for each chemotherapy course.Table 3Cases of proven or probable IFD in the cohortFigure 1Days of antifungal therapy during treatment of pediatric ALL Results A total of 11/304 (3.6%) patients had proven (n=9)/probable (n=2) IFD during ALL treatment. There were no differences in age, sex, or leukemia type for those with and without IFD (Table 1). Invasive mold infections accounted for 4/11 cases of IFD, with 3 cases occurring during Induction and 1 case during Consolidation (Table 2). Cases are shown in Table 3. Two infections with yeasts occurred, biopsy-proven invasive candidiasis during blinatumomab therapy and candidemia during an OCTADAD course of Interfant-06. Five cases of proven/probable Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia occurred during maintenance chemotherapy. No IFD cases occurred in interim maintenance or delayed intensification. For routine ALL chemotherapy courses, the IFD incidence-rate was highest during Induction (Table 2). Prophylaxis was frequently administered during Induction, with lower prescribing rates during other courses (Figure 1). Over the course of the study, the predominant prophylactic agent changed from fluconazole to micafungin. Conclusion IFD was uncommon in this single-center ALL cohort. Most episodes of IFD occurred during intensive chemotherapy courses, consistent with guidelines that children with ALL should receive prophylaxis during Induction. A majority of patients with PJP were not adherent to prophylaxis, highlighting its importance. Over the past decade, echinocandins have become to predominant antifungal prophylactic agents at our institution. Disclosures Grant C. Paulsen, MD, Moderna, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support Lara A. Danziger-Isakov, MD, MPH, Aicuris: Grant/Research Support|Ansun BioPharma: Grant/Research Support|Astellas: Advisor/Consultant|Astellas: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer (Any division): Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.685
Primary Topic
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-470. Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Disease in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Grant Paulsen, W Otto, Caitlin Brammer, Mark Murphy et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
article

P-470. Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Disease in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Grant Paulsen, W Otto, Caitlin Brammer, Mark Murphy, Justin Markham, Caroline Maguire, Lara Danziger-Isakov, Hilary Miller-Handley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Risk of IFD is variable in children with ALL, and need for antifungal prophylaxis varies. There are few epidemiologic studies of IFD in ALL patients. This study sought to define the epidemiology of IFD and evaluate use of antifungal prophylaxis in ALL.Table 1Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for those with and without IFD in the cohortTable 2Incidence and incidence-rates of ifD Methods This was a retrospective study of patients with de novo ALL treated at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center from 1/1/2012-12/31/2022. Clinical and microbiology data was abstracted from the medical record. Proven and probable IFD was identified using MSG/EORTC definitions. The incidence and incidence-rates of IFD were calculated. Days of antifungal therapy were collected for each chemotherapy course.Table 3Cases of proven or probable IFD in the cohortFigure 1Days of antifungal therapy during treatment of pediatric ALL Results A total of 11/304 (3.6%) patients had proven (n=9)/probable (n=2) IFD during ALL treatment. There were no differences in age, sex, or leukemia type for those with and without IFD (Table 1). Invasive mold infections accounted for 4/11 cases of IFD, with 3 cases occurring during Induction and 1 case during Consolidation (Table 2). Cases are shown in Table 3. Two infections with yeasts occurred, biopsy-proven invasive candidiasis during blinatumomab therapy and candidemia during an OCTADAD course of Interfant-06. Five cases of proven/probable Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia occurred during maintenance chemotherapy. No IFD cases occurred in interim maintenance or delayed intensification. For routine ALL chemotherapy courses, the IFD incidence-rate was highest during Induction (Table 2). Prophylaxis was frequently administered during Induction, with lower prescribing rates during other courses (Figure 1). Over the course of the study, the predominant prophylactic agent changed from fluconazole to micafungin. Conclusion IFD was uncommon in this single-center ALL cohort. Most episodes of IFD occurred during intensive chemotherapy courses, consistent with guidelines that children with ALL should receive prophylaxis during Induction. A majority of patients with PJP were not adherent to prophylaxis, highlighting its importance. Over the past decade, echinocandins have become to predominant antifungal prophylactic agents at our institution. Disclosures Grant C. Paulsen, MD, Moderna, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support Lara A. Danziger-Isakov, MD, MPH, Aicuris: Grant/Research Support|Ansun BioPharma: Grant/Research Support|Astellas: Advisor/Consultant|Astellas: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer (Any division): Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.