Abortion providers as human rights defenders: policy priorities for South Africa

South Africa's Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act (CTOP) protects legal abortion access, yet systemic service delivery barriers persist, limiting care and contributing to preventable maternal morbidity. This policy brief draws on a 2023-2024 mixed-methods study, including a literature review, online survey, focus groups, and in-depth interviews with 33 abortion providers across seven provinces. Findings highlight chronic underinvestment, staffing shortages, unclear conscientious objection guidelines, facility-based stigma, and inadequate managerial support, alongside discrimination against women seeking services. These barriers drive some women toward unsafe alternatives. Despite challenges, providers remain committed, viewing their work as central to reproductive justice and constitutional rights. Addressing gaps requires integrating CTOP into core services, expanding values clarification training, supporting providers, enforcing rights-based guidelines, and engaging communities to ensure safe abortion care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Reproductive Health
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2025.1727085
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abortion providers as human rights defenders: policy priorities for South Africa

Jessica Rucell, Mbalenhle Matandela, Lucy Khofi
1 citations
Frontiers in Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health and Contraception
41.85
article

Abortion providers as human rights defenders: policy priorities for South Africa

Jessica Rucell, Mbalenhle Matandela, Lucy Khofi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

South Africa's Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act (CTOP) protects legal abortion access, yet systemic service delivery barriers persist, limiting care and contributing to preventable maternal morbidity. This policy brief draws on a 2023-2024 mixed-methods study, including a literature review, online survey, focus groups, and in-depth interviews with 33 abortion providers across seven provinces. Findings highlight chronic underinvestment, staffing shortages, unclear conscientious objection guidelines, facility-based stigma, and inadequate managerial support, alongside discrimination against women seeking services. These barriers drive some women toward unsafe alternatives. Despite challenges, providers remain committed, viewing their work as central to reproductive justice and constitutional rights. Addressing gaps requires integrating CTOP into core services, expanding values clarification training, supporting providers, enforcing rights-based guidelines, and engaging communities to ensure safe abortion care.

Frontiers in Reproductive HealthVol. 7
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
41.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Abortion providers as human rights defenders: policy priorities for South Africa — Jessica Rucell, Mbalenhle Matandela, et al. · Frontiers in Reproductive Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS