P-882. Oral Antibiotic Stepdown Therapy for Uncomplicated Enterococcus Blood Stream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract Background Despite increasing evidence supporting oral antibiotic therapy (OAT) for uncomplicated bloodstream infections (uBSI), data specific to Enterococcus bloodstream infections are limited. Therefore, we evaluated clinical outcomes associated with OAT versus continued intravenous (IV) therapy for Enterococcus uBSI.Demographics and outcomes comparing intravenous only and intravenous to oral stepdown therapyIV= intravenous, OAT= oral antimicrobial therapy, IQR= interquartile range, SD= Standard Deviation IV= intravenous, OAT= oral antimicrobial therapy, SSTI= skin and soft tissue infection Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults diagnosed with uBSI due to Enterococcus species between 1/1/2013, and 12/31/2019. Patients were excluded if they had endovascular, central nervous system, or uncontrolled bone/joint infections; lacked documented blood culture clearance; or remained febrile after 72 hours of effective therapy. We compared outcomes between patients who received only IV therapy and those transitioned to OAT. Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, and adverse drug events. A composite outcome comprising 30-day mortality, 30-day hospital readmission, and infection recurrence was used. Fisher’s exact test, t-tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for comparisons.Choice of stepdown oral antibiotic in IV to OAT groupIV= intravenous, OAT= oral antimicrobial therapy Results Of 493 Enterococcus BSI cases identified, 57 met inclusion criteria for uBSI. Baseline demographics and Pitt bacteremia scores were similar between groups (Table 1). Patients receiving OAT (n=24) were more likely to have a urinary source and less likely to have intra-abdominal or central line–associated sources (p< 0.05) (Figure 1). Amoxicillin-clavulanate was the most used agent for OAT (Figure 2). OAT was associated with a shorter median hospital LOS (5 vs. 9 days, p< 0.05) and higher rates of outpatient antibiotic completion (p< 0.05). In the IV group (n=33), 30-day mortality occurred in 4 patients versus none in the OAT group (p=0.14). Infection recurrence occurred in 2 OAT patients and none in the IV group (p=0.16). There were no significant differences in the composite adverse outcome (39.1% OAT vs. 33.3% IV, p=0.78) or 30-day readmission rates (40.9% OAT vs. 21.2% IV, p=0.14). Conclusion Oral stepdown therapy for uBSI was associated with reduced hospital LOS without increased adverse outcomes, highlighting potential opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship in the management of Enterococcus bloodstream infections. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1090
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-882. Oral Antibiotic Stepdown Therapy for Uncomplicated Enterococcus Blood Stream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Jasmine Riviere Marcelin, Clarivet Torres, Evangeline C. Green, Elizabeth Lyden et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

P-882. Oral Antibiotic Stepdown Therapy for Uncomplicated Enterococcus Blood Stream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Jasmine Riviere Marcelin, Clarivet Torres, Evangeline C. Green, Elizabeth Lyden, Mackenzie R Keintz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite increasing evidence supporting oral antibiotic therapy (OAT) for uncomplicated bloodstream infections (uBSI), data specific to Enterococcus bloodstream infections are limited. Therefore, we evaluated clinical outcomes associated with OAT versus continued intravenous (IV) therapy for Enterococcus uBSI.Demographics and outcomes comparing intravenous only and intravenous to oral stepdown therapyIV= intravenous, OAT= oral antimicrobial therapy, IQR= interquartile range, SD= Standard Deviation IV= intravenous, OAT= oral antimicrobial therapy, SSTI= skin and soft tissue infection Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults diagnosed with uBSI due to Enterococcus species between 1/1/2013, and 12/31/2019. Patients were excluded if they had endovascular, central nervous system, or uncontrolled bone/joint infections; lacked documented blood culture clearance; or remained febrile after 72 hours of effective therapy. We compared outcomes between patients who received only IV therapy and those transitioned to OAT. Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, and adverse drug events. A composite outcome comprising 30-day mortality, 30-day hospital readmission, and infection recurrence was used. Fisher’s exact test, t-tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for comparisons.Choice of stepdown oral antibiotic in IV to OAT groupIV= intravenous, OAT= oral antimicrobial therapy Results Of 493 Enterococcus BSI cases identified, 57 met inclusion criteria for uBSI. Baseline demographics and Pitt bacteremia scores were similar between groups (Table 1). Patients receiving OAT (n=24) were more likely to have a urinary source and less likely to have intra-abdominal or central line–associated sources (p< 0.05) (Figure 1). Amoxicillin-clavulanate was the most used agent for OAT (Figure 2). OAT was associated with a shorter median hospital LOS (5 vs. 9 days, p< 0.05) and higher rates of outpatient antibiotic completion (p< 0.05). In the IV group (n=33), 30-day mortality occurred in 4 patients versus none in the OAT group (p=0.14). Infection recurrence occurred in 2 OAT patients and none in the IV group (p=0.16). There were no significant differences in the composite adverse outcome (39.1% OAT vs. 33.3% IV, p=0.78) or 30-day readmission rates (40.9% OAT vs. 21.2% IV, p=0.14). Conclusion Oral stepdown therapy for uBSI was associated with reduced hospital LOS without increased adverse outcomes, highlighting potential opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship in the management of Enterococcus bloodstream infections. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.