P-1128. Effectiveness of KAIZEN Program for Reducing Spinal Surgical Site Infections Through Issue Identification via Descriptive Epidemiological Analysis and Enhanced Infection Control Measures

Abstract Background Addressing surgical site infections (SSIs) is challenging due to the involvement of multiple departments. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of enhancing countermeasures, including issue identification via descriptive epidemiological analysis, in reducing SSIs in spinal surgery. Methods We previously performed the bundle approach, including MRSA active surveillance with decolonization and cefazolin-based antimicrobial prophylaxis stewardship. In response to an increase in SSI cases detected through surveillance in 2018, the Infection Control Department conducted a descriptive epidemiological analysis to identify issues. SSIs were determined based on the NHSN definition and statistically analyzed using a risk index incorporating ASA classification, operative time, and wound classification. Results Of the 11 SSI cases in 2018, five (45.5%) were caused by MRSA, though all patients were non-carriers preoperatively. Three patients (27.2%) were classified as ASA category 3, and seven (63.6%) had an operative time exceeding the 75th percentile. Intraoperative hypothermia (< 36°C) was observed in six patients (54.6%). Peak blood glucose levels >150 mg/dL within 48 hours postoperatively were identified in seven patients (63.6%), three of whom were non-diabetic. Postoperative blood glucose was not measured in three patients (27.2%). Measures implemented to strengthen infection control bundles included intraoperative warming, blood glucose management for both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, and the use of a 0.35% povidone-iodine diluted solution for intraoperative wound irrigation. The incidence of SSIs significantly decreased between 2020 and 2021 compared to 2018–2019 (0.6% [2/344] vs. 5.4% [17/315], P < 0.001), with a particularly notable reduction in cases with risk indices of 1 and 2 (0.8% [2/244] vs. 6.6% [13/197], P < 0.001). Conclusion In addition to intraoperative intervention, the implementation of strengthened measures focusing on addressing hypothermia and hyperglycemia contributed to a reduction in the incidence of SSIs in high-risk spinal surgery. Problem identification through descriptive epidemiological analysis and multisectoral collaboration effectively strengthens SSI countermeasures. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1322
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1128. Effectiveness of KAIZEN Program for Reducing Spinal Surgical Site Infections Through Issue Identification via Descriptive Epidemiological Analysis and Enhanced Infection Control Measures

Shinobu Uezono, Aya Inamori, Hiroyuki Tominaga, Shoko Arimura et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Surgical site infection prevention
article

P-1128. Effectiveness of KAIZEN Program for Reducing Spinal Surgical Site Infections Through Issue Identification via Descriptive Epidemiological Analysis and Enhanced Infection Control Measures

Shinobu Uezono, Aya Inamori, Hiroyuki Tominaga, Shoko Arimura, Hideki Kawamura, Noboru Taniguchi, Nao Murata
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Addressing surgical site infections (SSIs) is challenging due to the involvement of multiple departments. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of enhancing countermeasures, including issue identification via descriptive epidemiological analysis, in reducing SSIs in spinal surgery. Methods We previously performed the bundle approach, including MRSA active surveillance with decolonization and cefazolin-based antimicrobial prophylaxis stewardship. In response to an increase in SSI cases detected through surveillance in 2018, the Infection Control Department conducted a descriptive epidemiological analysis to identify issues. SSIs were determined based on the NHSN definition and statistically analyzed using a risk index incorporating ASA classification, operative time, and wound classification. Results Of the 11 SSI cases in 2018, five (45.5%) were caused by MRSA, though all patients were non-carriers preoperatively. Three patients (27.2%) were classified as ASA category 3, and seven (63.6%) had an operative time exceeding the 75th percentile. Intraoperative hypothermia (< 36°C) was observed in six patients (54.6%). Peak blood glucose levels >150 mg/dL within 48 hours postoperatively were identified in seven patients (63.6%), three of whom were non-diabetic. Postoperative blood glucose was not measured in three patients (27.2%). Measures implemented to strengthen infection control bundles included intraoperative warming, blood glucose management for both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, and the use of a 0.35% povidone-iodine diluted solution for intraoperative wound irrigation. The incidence of SSIs significantly decreased between 2020 and 2021 compared to 2018–2019 (0.6% [2/344] vs. 5.4% [17/315], P < 0.001), with a particularly notable reduction in cases with risk indices of 1 and 2 (0.8% [2/244] vs. 6.6% [13/197], P < 0.001). Conclusion In addition to intraoperative intervention, the implementation of strengthened measures focusing on addressing hypothermia and hyperglycemia contributed to a reduction in the incidence of SSIs in high-risk spinal surgery. Problem identification through descriptive epidemiological analysis and multisectoral collaboration effectively strengthens SSI countermeasures. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Kagoshima University (JP), Kagoshima University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.