P-199. Molecular Epidemiology of the Hepatitis C Virus from the Philippines National Institutes of Health from 2017 to 2025

Abstract Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the Philippines has a prevalence of < 1% and is much less common than Hepatitis B, which has a nationwide prevalence of 10-17%. HCV genotyping is only done sporadically, usually during outbreak investigations, and there is limited surveillance data in literature. Most local HCV infection has been reported among people who inject drugs (PWID), with a co-infection rate of up to 70% among those PWID with HIV. Our central laboratory at the University of the Philippines National Institutes of Health (UP-NIH) is one of a few facilities nationwide that routinely performs HCV genotyping. We report our experience since we started HCV genotyping in 2017 until 2025 to better understand the evolving local molecular epidemiology of HCV.Figure 1.Phylogenetic analysis of HCV genotypes from UP-NIH from 2017 to 2025. Methods De-identified HCV-positive clinical plasma samples collected from 2017-2025 and banked at the UP-NIH Central Laboratory were included in the study. This study was exempted from ethical review by the University of the Philippines Manila - Research Ethics Board since no identifying data was collected. The core region (360 bp) was amplified using nested PCR and amplicons underwent capillary sequencing. Sequence quality control and multiple sequence alignment of all sample consensus sequences with representative sequences of major HCV genotypes from the GenBank database were performed using MEGA 7.0. The maximum likelihood tree was constructed with GTR+F+I+G4 model and 1000 bootstrap replicates using IQ-TREE. Results A total of 82 samples were analyzed during the study period. Table 1 shows the overall genotype distribution and breakdown across different years. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic analysis among representative genotypes.Table 1.HCV genotype distribution from 2017 to 2025 at the UP-NIH Central Laboratory.YearHCV GenotypeTotal per year1a1b2a2b3a4a620178102011132018144441002720191200101115202020000002202150000005202231000004202390000009202430000003202540000004Total (%)60647122N=82 Conclusion Genotype 1a remains the most prevalent HCV genotype in the Philippines, with no other HCV genotypes other than 1b reported since 2020. This may reflect the increasing uptake of curative treatment globally with the resultant loss in diversity. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.421
Primary Topic
Hepatitis C virus research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-199. Molecular Epidemiology of the Hepatitis C Virus from the Philippines National Institutes of Health from 2017 to 2025

Coleen M. Pangilinan, A. Salvana, Mary Grace T Hernaez, Brian Schwem et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Hepatitis C virus research
article

P-199. Molecular Epidemiology of the Hepatitis C Virus from the Philippines National Institutes of Health from 2017 to 2025

Coleen M. Pangilinan, A. Salvana, Mary Grace T Hernaez, Brian Schwem, M.A. JOWINA GALARION
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the Philippines has a prevalence of < 1% and is much less common than Hepatitis B, which has a nationwide prevalence of 10-17%. HCV genotyping is only done sporadically, usually during outbreak investigations, and there is limited surveillance data in literature. Most local HCV infection has been reported among people who inject drugs (PWID), with a co-infection rate of up to 70% among those PWID with HIV. Our central laboratory at the University of the Philippines National Institutes of Health (UP-NIH) is one of a few facilities nationwide that routinely performs HCV genotyping. We report our experience since we started HCV genotyping in 2017 until 2025 to better understand the evolving local molecular epidemiology of HCV.Figure 1.Phylogenetic analysis of HCV genotypes from UP-NIH from 2017 to 2025. Methods De-identified HCV-positive clinical plasma samples collected from 2017-2025 and banked at the UP-NIH Central Laboratory were included in the study. This study was exempted from ethical review by the University of the Philippines Manila - Research Ethics Board since no identifying data was collected. The core region (360 bp) was amplified using nested PCR and amplicons underwent capillary sequencing. Sequence quality control and multiple sequence alignment of all sample consensus sequences with representative sequences of major HCV genotypes from the GenBank database were performed using MEGA 7.0. The maximum likelihood tree was constructed with GTR+F+I+G4 model and 1000 bootstrap replicates using IQ-TREE. Results A total of 82 samples were analyzed during the study period. Table 1 shows the overall genotype distribution and breakdown across different years. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic analysis among representative genotypes.Table 1.HCV genotype distribution from 2017 to 2025 at the UP-NIH Central Laboratory.YearHCV GenotypeTotal per year1a1b2a2b3a4a620178102011132018144441002720191200101115202020000002202150000005202231000004202390000009202430000003202540000004Total (%)60647122N=82 Conclusion Genotype 1a remains the most prevalent HCV genotype in the Philippines, with no other HCV genotypes other than 1b reported since 2020. This may reflect the increasing uptake of curative treatment globally with the resultant loss in diversity. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
University of the East (PH), Asian Social Institute (PH), Wyoming Department of Agriculture (US), University of the Philippines Manila (PH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Hepatitis C virus research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.