An Analysis of AI Literacy Levels and Educational Needs of University Freshmen

This study aims to empirically examine the AI literacy levels and educational needs of university freshmen in response to the increasing importance of AI competencies in an era marked by the widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence. AI literacy was conceptualized as a multidimensional construct comprising attitudes, knowledge, and skills, and further defined by seven subcomponents: ethics, evaluation, identification, understanding, usage, application, and creation. Based on this framework, a survey instrument was developed and administered to 169 first-year students at University A. The results indicated that students’ overall AI literacy was above average, with particularly high levels in AI usage and application, while AI creation—which includes advanced abilities such as model design and programming—was notably low. Significant differences in AI creation literacy were observed across academic disciplines, with humanities students exhibiting lower levels than students in AI-related majors. Analysis of students’ educational experiences and needs revealed that most participants had prior AI learning experiences but identified insufficient coding and basic computer knowledge as major challenges. There was also strong demand for general education courses for non-majors and for applied courses focusing on generative AI utilization. Based on these findings, this study suggests the need for a balanced framework in university general education that integrates both user-oriented and producer-oriented AI literacy, reinforces attitude-based competencies such as AI ethics and evaluation, and provides discipline-specific instructional approaches.

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Association of General Education
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2025.19.6.87
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analysis of AI Literacy Levels and Educational Needs of University Freshmen

The Korean Association of General Education
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

An Analysis of AI Literacy Levels and Educational Needs of University Freshmen

article en

Abstract

This study aims to empirically examine the AI literacy levels and educational needs of university freshmen in response to the increasing importance of AI competencies in an era marked by the widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence. AI literacy was conceptualized as a multidimensional construct comprising attitudes, knowledge, and skills, and further defined by seven subcomponents: ethics, evaluation, identification, understanding, usage, application, and creation. Based on this framework, a survey instrument was developed and administered to 169 first-year students at University A. The results indicated that students’ overall AI literacy was above average, with particularly high levels in AI usage and application, while AI creation—which includes advanced abilities such as model design and programming—was notably low. Significant differences in AI creation literacy were observed across academic disciplines, with humanities students exhibiting lower levels than students in AI-related majors. Analysis of students’ educational experiences and needs revealed that most participants had prior AI learning experiences but identified insufficient coding and basic computer knowledge as major challenges. There was also strong demand for general education courses for non-majors and for applied courses focusing on generative AI utilization. Based on these findings, this study suggests the need for a balanced framework in university general education that integrates both user-oriented and producer-oriented AI literacy, reinforces attitude-based competencies such as AI ethics and evaluation, and provides discipline-specific instructional approaches.

The Korean Association of General EducationVol. 19(6)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Analysis of AI Literacy Levels and Educational Needs of University Freshmen · The Korean Association of General Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS