Consensus guidelines for antibacterial prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia

Since the publication of the Australian consensus guidelines in 2011, the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with neutropenia has remained controversial, because of concern that the risks of promoting antimicrobial resistance outweighed the level of evidence that their use reduced mortality. Populations at risk have changed over this period and now include a multitude of new cancer therapies, such as targeted cancer therapies and immunotherapies. Emerging understanding about the importance and role of the microbiome in defining treatment response and patterns of antibiotic resistance has also expanded. In addition, the management of neutropenic fever has improved significantly through the development and routine implementation of sepsis pathways. These updated consensus guidelines review recent evidence for the use of antibacterial prophylaxis in adults and children receiving cancer therapies associated with neutropenia. Recommendations presented in these guidelines were based on evaluating current evidence for the benefits and harms of antibacterial prophylaxis while considering the current Australian and New Zealand healthcare setting. In most circumstances, the potential harm of antibiotic resistance, adverse effects of antibiotics and disruption to the microbiome, outweighed the benefit of reducing the incidence of infection, without a benefit in mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Internal Medicine Journal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70250
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consensus guidelines for antibacterial prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia

Midori Nakagaki, Monica A. Slavin, Arran Hamilton, Andrea S. Henden et al.
Internal Medicine Journal
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
article

Consensus guidelines for antibacterial prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia

Midori Nakagaki, Monica A. Slavin, Arran Hamilton, Andrea S. Henden, Matthew T. Wheeler, A. Christie Nelson, Benjamin W. Teh, Daniel K. Yeoh, Zoe McQuilten, Gordon Reynolds, S. Sandhu, Julian Lindsay
article en

Abstract

Since the publication of the Australian consensus guidelines in 2011, the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with neutropenia has remained controversial, because of concern that the risks of promoting antimicrobial resistance outweighed the level of evidence that their use reduced mortality. Populations at risk have changed over this period and now include a multitude of new cancer therapies, such as targeted cancer therapies and immunotherapies. Emerging understanding about the importance and role of the microbiome in defining treatment response and patterns of antibiotic resistance has also expanded. In addition, the management of neutropenic fever has improved significantly through the development and routine implementation of sepsis pathways. These updated consensus guidelines review recent evidence for the use of antibacterial prophylaxis in adults and children receiving cancer therapies associated with neutropenia. Recommendations presented in these guidelines were based on evaluating current evidence for the benefits and harms of antibacterial prophylaxis while considering the current Australian and New Zealand healthcare setting. In most circumstances, the potential harm of antibiotic resistance, adverse effects of antibiotics and disruption to the microbiome, outweighed the benefit of reducing the incidence of infection, without a benefit in mortality.

Internal Medicine JournalVol. 55(S7)
The University of Sydney (AU), Royal Women's Hospital (AU), University of Auckland (NZ), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Princess Margaret Hospital for Children (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Tauranga Hospital (NZ), Monash Health (AU), Sydney Children's Hospital (AU), Cancer Care Services (US), Austin Health (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.