Standard V <scp>o</scp> <sub>2</sub> measures underestimate metabolic demand during blood flow-restricted exercise
Systemic oxygen consumption (V̇o<sub>2</sub>) has traditionally been the gold standard for assessing aerobic metabolic demand. However, under conditions that alter normal blood flow or ventilation, such as blood flow restriction (BFR), V̇o<sub>2</sub> may no longer reflect metabolic cost. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the total oxygen requirement (Vo<sub>2</sub>) of walking with and without BFR, including in-exercise Vo<sub>2</sub> and excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC). In a randomized crossover design, 18 recreationally active participants completed three, 3-min treadmill walking bouts, each separated by a 1-min standing rest to simulate a typical repeated BFR protocol. In the BFR condition, tourniquets were applied to the upper thighs at 100% of the limb occlusion pressure throughout the interval protocol and removed for 15 min of seated recovery. Expired gasses were recorded continuously. Walking Vo<sub>2</sub> was initially lower in the BFR condition compared with control (CON) (<i>P</i> = 0.0002), but reversed over time, with BFR producing a greater total walking Vo<sub>2</sub> (BFR: 16,638 ± 2,157 mL; CON: 15,219 ± 2,444 mL; <i>P</i> = 0.0006) and higher EPOC (BFR: 7,789 ± 837 mL; CON: 6,267 ± 1,102 mL; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). The relative contribution of EPOC to total oxygen demand was elevated with BFR (BFR: 32.0 ± 2.8%; CON: 29.2 ± 2.1%; <i>P</i> = 0.0012), together indicating a time-dependent shift in V̇o<sub>2</sub>. This suggests that acute, rate-based V̇o<sub>2</sub> does not fully capture the true metabolic demands of BFR exercise. Researchers should instead consider the total oxygen and recovery when interpreting metabolic load during BFR.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study challenges the reliability of V̇o<sub>2</sub> as a standalone marker of metabolic demand during blood flow-restricted (BFR) exercise. Although V̇o<sub>2</sub> during BFR walking was initially lower, a delayed rise during and prolonged recovery following BFR resulted in a greater total oxygen cost and excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC). We suggest a temporal shift of oxygen dynamics, reflecting altered timing of uptake and recovery. Total oxygen uptake should be considered with BFR exercise.
Authors
- Jamie F. Burr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5449-3352)
- Devin G. McCarthy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7326-7705)
- Avery Bendell
Institutions
- University of Guelph (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Published
- 2026-01-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00715.2025
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 51.14