A comparison of modeled daytime E regions from E-PROBED and PyIRI with ionosonde observations

Abstract. While the F region is the primary focus of many ionospheric models because it contains the peak electron density, the E region is an important region for ionospheric conductivities and high-frequency radio propagation. This study analyzes modeled E regions from the newly developed PyIRI and E-PROBED models. A long-term comparison of E region predictions from E-PROBED and PyIRI with ionosonde observations is performed for three sites spanning low- (Fortaleza, Brazil), mid- (El Arenosillo, Spain), and high-latitudes (Gakona, Alaska). Modeled foE and hmE trends are compared against a combination of manually-scaled and automatically-scaled ionograms using ARTIST-5 for the period 2009–2024 for El Arenosillo and Gakona, and 2015–2024 for Fortaleza. Measured and modeled virtual heights are compared for a subset of the ionograms through the use of a numerical ray-tracer. Overall, the models showed reasonable agreement with the ionosonde observations, with solar cycle, seasonal, and diurnal trends well captured for foE. E-PROBED generally overestimates foE with Mean Absolute Relative Errors (MRAEs) peaking around 70 % at dusk, while PyIRI showed close agreement with ionosonde foE resulting in MRAE peaks around 10 %. The hmE predictions showed weaker agreement, with a 15-20 km overestimate from E-PROBED when compared against auto-scaled ionograms, and a constant hmE prediction of 110 km for all times from PyIRI. However, manually-scaled hmE estimates show close agreement with E-PROBED predictions, indicating that great care must be taken when using auto-scaled hmE. Modeled virtual heights derived from E-PROBED and PyIRI show reasonable agreement with ionosonde observations, providing confidence in altitude-integrated electron density profiles. A slight bias exists between the modeled and measured virtual heights, and the direction of the bias reverses for manual- versus auto-scaled ionograms, demonstrating that auto-scaled uncertainties are also present in the virtual height observations. Overall, these results indicate that E-PROBED and PyIRI provide reasonable E region estimates and may be used for practical applications that require modeled E region parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annales Geophysicae
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-17-2026
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of modeled daytime E regions from E-PROBED and PyIRI with ionosonde observations

Dong L. Wu, Kyle E. Fitch, Nimalan Swarnalingam, Jorge L. Chau et al.
Annales Geophysicae
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

A comparison of modeled daytime E regions from E-PROBED and PyIRI with ionosonde observations

Dong L. Wu, Kyle E. Fitch, Nimalan Swarnalingam, Jorge L. Chau, Eugene V. Dao, Yosuke Yamazaki, Cornelius Csar Jude H. Salinas, Victoriya V. Forsythe
article en

Abstract

Abstract. While the F region is the primary focus of many ionospheric models because it contains the peak electron density, the E region is an important region for ionospheric conductivities and high-frequency radio propagation. This study analyzes modeled E regions from the newly developed PyIRI and E-PROBED models. A long-term comparison of E region predictions from E-PROBED and PyIRI with ionosonde observations is performed for three sites spanning low- (Fortaleza, Brazil), mid- (El Arenosillo, Spain), and high-latitudes (Gakona, Alaska). Modeled foE and hmE trends are compared against a combination of manually-scaled and automatically-scaled ionograms using ARTIST-5 for the period 2009–2024 for El Arenosillo and Gakona, and 2015–2024 for Fortaleza. Measured and modeled virtual heights are compared for a subset of the ionograms through the use of a numerical ray-tracer. Overall, the models showed reasonable agreement with the ionosonde observations, with solar cycle, seasonal, and diurnal trends well captured for foE. E-PROBED generally overestimates foE with Mean Absolute Relative Errors (MRAEs) peaking around 70 % at dusk, while PyIRI showed close agreement with ionosonde foE resulting in MRAE peaks around 10 %. The hmE predictions showed weaker agreement, with a 15-20 km overestimate from E-PROBED when compared against auto-scaled ionograms, and a constant hmE prediction of 110 km for all times from PyIRI. However, manually-scaled hmE estimates show close agreement with E-PROBED predictions, indicating that great care must be taken when using auto-scaled hmE. Modeled virtual heights derived from E-PROBED and PyIRI show reasonable agreement with ionosonde observations, providing confidence in altitude-integrated electron density profiles. A slight bias exists between the modeled and measured virtual heights, and the direction of the bias reverses for manual- versus auto-scaled ionograms, demonstrating that auto-scaled uncertainties are also present in the virtual height observations. Overall, these results indicate that E-PROBED and PyIRI provide reasonable E region estimates and may be used for practical applications that require modeled E region parameters.

Annales GeophysicaeVol. 44(1)
United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US), United States Naval Research Laboratory (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), University of America (US), Leibniz Institute of Atmospheric Physics at the Rostock University (DE), U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology (US), Catholic University of America (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.