P-1702. Impact of Facility-level Rates of Lower Respiratory Cultures on Rates of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa among U.S. Hospitals, 2019-2023

Abstract Background Understanding variability in culturing practices across facilities can inform the interpretation of surveillance data (e.g., comparing rates of pathogens across facilities). Diagnostic stewardship efforts aim to affect culturing practices. We explored facility-level variability of lower respiratory cultures (LRC) and associations between overall LRC rate and its association with facility-level rates of respiratory methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). Methods Hospitalization and culture data from 2019-2023 were obtained from the Premier Healthcare Database. Facilities were included that reported hospitalization and LRC data every month of the study. Overall, LRC and LRC positive for MRSA or PA were categorized as admission cultures (AC), post-AC (PAC), and ventilator-associated PAC (V-PAC). ACs were collected within 3 days of admission, and PACs on or after day 4. V-PACs were PACs with a hospital charge for mechanical ventilation on the same day. Rates were reported as culture number per 10,000 discharges (AC), 10,000 patient days (PAC), and 10,000 ventilator days (V-PAC). We used multivariable negative binomial regression to assess the association of overall facility LRC rates and rates of LRC positive for MRSA or PA, adjusted for facility teaching status, urbanicity, size, region, year, and average length of stay. Results Seventy-three facilities contributed 273,901 LRCs over the study period. LRC rates varied across facilities, with a median AC rate of 287.4 per 10,000 discharges (interquartile range [IQR] 172.8-397), median PAC rate of 42.4 per 10,000 patient days (IQR 23.8-59.8) and median V-PAC rate of 155.2 per 10,000 ventilator days (IQR 85.7-253.2). Unadjusted analyses (Figure 1) and multivariable models showed increased rates of LRC positive for MRSA or PA as overall LRC rates increased (p< 0.0001 for AC, PAC, and V-PAC). Conclusion We observed considerable variability in facility LRC rates. Higher overall LRC rates were significantly associated with increased LRC pathogen detection. Information on diagnostic testing in facilities may provide important context for public health. Facility diagnostic stewardship will likely impact the clinical management of patients and surveillance of selected pathogens. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1874
Primary Topic
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1702. Impact of Facility-level Rates of Lower Respiratory Cultures on Rates of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa among U.S. Hospitals, 2019-2023

Sujan Reddy, Natalie McCarthy, Joseph D. Lutgring, Mia E Ferretti et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
article

P-1702. Impact of Facility-level Rates of Lower Respiratory Cultures on Rates of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa among U.S. Hospitals, 2019-2023

Sujan Reddy, Natalie McCarthy, Joseph D. Lutgring, Mia E Ferretti, Hannah Wolford
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Understanding variability in culturing practices across facilities can inform the interpretation of surveillance data (e.g., comparing rates of pathogens across facilities). Diagnostic stewardship efforts aim to affect culturing practices. We explored facility-level variability of lower respiratory cultures (LRC) and associations between overall LRC rate and its association with facility-level rates of respiratory methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). Methods Hospitalization and culture data from 2019-2023 were obtained from the Premier Healthcare Database. Facilities were included that reported hospitalization and LRC data every month of the study. Overall, LRC and LRC positive for MRSA or PA were categorized as admission cultures (AC), post-AC (PAC), and ventilator-associated PAC (V-PAC). ACs were collected within 3 days of admission, and PACs on or after day 4. V-PACs were PACs with a hospital charge for mechanical ventilation on the same day. Rates were reported as culture number per 10,000 discharges (AC), 10,000 patient days (PAC), and 10,000 ventilator days (V-PAC). We used multivariable negative binomial regression to assess the association of overall facility LRC rates and rates of LRC positive for MRSA or PA, adjusted for facility teaching status, urbanicity, size, region, year, and average length of stay. Results Seventy-three facilities contributed 273,901 LRCs over the study period. LRC rates varied across facilities, with a median AC rate of 287.4 per 10,000 discharges (interquartile range [IQR] 172.8-397), median PAC rate of 42.4 per 10,000 patient days (IQR 23.8-59.8) and median V-PAC rate of 155.2 per 10,000 ventilator days (IQR 85.7-253.2). Unadjusted analyses (Figure 1) and multivariable models showed increased rates of LRC positive for MRSA or PA as overall LRC rates increased (p< 0.0001 for AC, PAC, and V-PAC). Conclusion We observed considerable variability in facility LRC rates. Higher overall LRC rates were significantly associated with increased LRC pathogen detection. Information on diagnostic testing in facilities may provide important context for public health. Facility diagnostic stewardship will likely impact the clinical management of patients and surveillance of selected pathogens. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Emory University (US), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (UG), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KE), CDC Foundation (US), Texas Center for Infectious Disease (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.