P-817. Comparison of swab versus fluid culture obtained from infected sites in the operating room

Abstract Background Surgically obtained specimens from clinically infected sites are regularly submitted from the operating room for Gram stain and culture, with results used to inform empiric and, then, definitive antibiotic therapy. Guidelines on utilization of the microbiology laboratory state that fluid or tissue specimens are strongly preferred to swab. We are not aware of a prospective study that examines this recommendation. Methods In this ‘real-world’ study, surgeons were asked at surgery to submit for Gram stain and culture both a swab with gel transport medium and infected fluid in a sterile syringe or tissue from the same infected site. We evaluated concordance between Gram stain and culture for each individual specimen and then between swab vs the fluid or tissue specimens. Results were regarded as concordant if the same predominant organism(s) were identified by Gram stain and by culture. Organisms generally regarded as non-pathogens and/or reported as ‘rare growth’ were excluded from the analysis. Results A total of 71 pairs of specimens were collected from 68 patients who ranged in age from 28 to 92 years old. Sixty-three (93%) were male. Samples obtained were from various anatomical sites, predominantly from a lower extremity. For 39 of 71 (54.9%) swab samples, Gram stain and culture showed the same predominant organism(s) (concordance), compared to 53 of 71 (74.6%) samples of fluid or tissue (P = 0.03). Of the 17 cases in which results of culture of fluid or tissue and swab were not concordant, in 11 (64.7%) a bacterial pathogen was isolated from fluid or tissue but not from swab culture. In 4 (23.5%) cases, the swab culture yielded pathogenic bacteria that were not identified in fluid or tissue (11 of 17 vs 4 of 17, P = 0.04). In the 2 remaining cases, different pathogenic bacteria were isolated from cultures of fluid and swab. Conclusion Our study shows the validity of Gram stain and provides data to support current guidelines by documenting that Gram stain and culture of infected fluid or tissue yield more relevant data than Gram stain and culture of swab specimens. However, multiple specimens may provide even more reliable results. By enabling more directed selection of antibiotics, greater use of Gram stain and culture of liquid and tissue specimens may play an important role in antibiotic stewardship. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1025
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-817. Comparison of swab versus fluid culture obtained from infected sites in the operating room

Raymond A. Lopez, Monica Lou, Priya Amin, Daniel M Musher et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

P-817. Comparison of swab versus fluid culture obtained from infected sites in the operating room

Raymond A. Lopez, Monica Lou, Priya Amin, Daniel M Musher, Avvi R Shabat, Kenneth Muldrew
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Surgically obtained specimens from clinically infected sites are regularly submitted from the operating room for Gram stain and culture, with results used to inform empiric and, then, definitive antibiotic therapy. Guidelines on utilization of the microbiology laboratory state that fluid or tissue specimens are strongly preferred to swab. We are not aware of a prospective study that examines this recommendation. Methods In this ‘real-world’ study, surgeons were asked at surgery to submit for Gram stain and culture both a swab with gel transport medium and infected fluid in a sterile syringe or tissue from the same infected site. We evaluated concordance between Gram stain and culture for each individual specimen and then between swab vs the fluid or tissue specimens. Results were regarded as concordant if the same predominant organism(s) were identified by Gram stain and by culture. Organisms generally regarded as non-pathogens and/or reported as ‘rare growth’ were excluded from the analysis. Results A total of 71 pairs of specimens were collected from 68 patients who ranged in age from 28 to 92 years old. Sixty-three (93%) were male. Samples obtained were from various anatomical sites, predominantly from a lower extremity. For 39 of 71 (54.9%) swab samples, Gram stain and culture showed the same predominant organism(s) (concordance), compared to 53 of 71 (74.6%) samples of fluid or tissue (P = 0.03). Of the 17 cases in which results of culture of fluid or tissue and swab were not concordant, in 11 (64.7%) a bacterial pathogen was isolated from fluid or tissue but not from swab culture. In 4 (23.5%) cases, the swab culture yielded pathogenic bacteria that were not identified in fluid or tissue (11 of 17 vs 4 of 17, P = 0.04). In the 2 remaining cases, different pathogenic bacteria were isolated from cultures of fluid and swab. Conclusion Our study shows the validity of Gram stain and provides data to support current guidelines by documenting that Gram stain and culture of infected fluid or tissue yield more relevant data than Gram stain and culture of swab specimens. However, multiple specimens may provide even more reliable results. By enabling more directed selection of antibiotics, greater use of Gram stain and culture of liquid and tissue specimens may play an important role in antibiotic stewardship. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
BMC Software (United States) (US), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), St. Joseph Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.