Cost‐Utility of Pharmacist‐Led Deprescribing Interventions for Community‐Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT Background Inappropriate medications continue to be dispensed to older adults. Deprescribing is an intervention carried out under the supervision of a health care professional, where medications that may cause harm or are no longer beneficial are reduced or withdrawn. Pharmacists play a crucial role in deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications. This systematic review aimed to summarize available evidence regarding the costs and cost‐utility of pharmacist‐led (or involved) deprescribing interventions for community‐dwelling older adults. Method A systematic literature search was conducted from inception to June 6, 2025, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central. The titles and abstracts were screened, followed by eligibility assessment of full texts. The quality of studies was appraised using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklists. The cost‐utility results were synthesized narratively. Results The search strategies identified a total of 3948 records, of which 9 articles were ultimately included in the systematic review based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. All economic evaluations were performed with a time horizon ranging from 6 to 12 months, and in most studies, the outcomes were derived from a single clinical trial. The cost‐utility analyses varied, with some strategies being dominant to an incremental cost‐utility ratio of €86 360.00 per quality‐adjusted life‐year. Conclusions The cost‐utility analyses indicated that pharmacist‐led deprescribing interventions are generally a cost‐effective option compared with usual care. While these interventions appear promising from an economic standpoint, more long‐term, population‐based studies are needed to validate these findings

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.70166
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost‐Utility of Pharmacist‐Led Deprescribing Interventions for Community‐Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Chiranjeev Sanyal, Feng Xie, Ronald Watema‐Lord
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Cost‐Utility of Pharmacist‐Led Deprescribing Interventions for Community‐Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Chiranjeev Sanyal, Feng Xie, Ronald Watema‐Lord
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Inappropriate medications continue to be dispensed to older adults. Deprescribing is an intervention carried out under the supervision of a health care professional, where medications that may cause harm or are no longer beneficial are reduced or withdrawn. Pharmacists play a crucial role in deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications. This systematic review aimed to summarize available evidence regarding the costs and cost‐utility of pharmacist‐led (or involved) deprescribing interventions for community‐dwelling older adults. Method A systematic literature search was conducted from inception to June 6, 2025, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central. The titles and abstracts were screened, followed by eligibility assessment of full texts. The quality of studies was appraised using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklists. The cost‐utility results were synthesized narratively. Results The search strategies identified a total of 3948 records, of which 9 articles were ultimately included in the systematic review based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. All economic evaluations were performed with a time horizon ranging from 6 to 12 months, and in most studies, the outcomes were derived from a single clinical trial. The cost‐utility analyses varied, with some strategies being dominant to an incremental cost‐utility ratio of €86 360.00 per quality‐adjusted life‐year. Conclusions The cost‐utility analyses indicated that pharmacist‐led deprescribing interventions are generally a cost‐effective option compared with usual care. While these interventions appear promising from an economic standpoint, more long‐term, population‐based studies are needed to validate these findings

JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACYVol. 9(2)
Dalhousie University (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Dalhousie University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.