P-49. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in a setting with high carbapenem-susceptibility among isolates

Abstract Background In most settings carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections predominate over carbapenem-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii (CSAB). Treatment guidelines focus on the management of CRAB and do not describe optimal antibiotic choice for CSAB. We describe clinical characteristics and outcomes in both CRAB and CSAB.Table 1:Clinical characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) versus carbapenem-sensitive Acinetobacter baumannii (CSAB) bloodstream infectionsTable 2:Clinical characteristics of Acinetobacter baumannii (CSAB) bloodstream infections, by adverse outcomes (all-cause in-hospital mortality, or requiring intensive care) Methods We examined consecutive episodes of CRAB or CSAB bloodstream infections in our institution from February 2022 to July 2024. Clinical, laboratory and microbiological data were tabulated, and adverse outcomes were defined as the need for intensive care (ICU) or all-cause in-hospital mortality. We compared i) CRAB to CSAB, and amongst patients with CSAB, ii) examined the parameters associated with adverse outcomes by appropriate univariate and multivariable analyses. Results We identified 71 unique episodes of bacteraemia, of which a majority 52/71 (73.2%) were nosocomial-onset. A minority of were CRAB (15/71, 21.1%). These patients often had ICU-onset, prior carbapenem exposure, and were more likely to experience mortality (73.3% vs 16.1%, p< 0.001). Only a minority of patients 7/71 (9.9%) received dual antibiotic therapy. Amongst the 56 patients with CSAB, only 11/56 (19.6%) experienced adverse outcomes. On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for elevated C-reactive protein, the use of carbapenems as the definitive antibiotic choice remained independently associated with adverse outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 7.34, 95%CI 1.25 – 43.01, p=0.027). Conclusion CSAB was far more common than CRAB in our setting. Prior carbapenem exposure and ICU-onset were important risk factors for CRAB, which had higher mortality than CSAB. Carbapenem-sparing options may be considered as definitive antibiotic choice for CSAB. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.278
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-49. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in a setting with high carbapenem-susceptibility among isolates

Matthew C Y Koh
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

P-49. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in a setting with high carbapenem-susceptibility among isolates

Matthew C Y Koh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In most settings carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections predominate over carbapenem-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii (CSAB). Treatment guidelines focus on the management of CRAB and do not describe optimal antibiotic choice for CSAB. We describe clinical characteristics and outcomes in both CRAB and CSAB.Table 1:Clinical characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) versus carbapenem-sensitive Acinetobacter baumannii (CSAB) bloodstream infectionsTable 2:Clinical characteristics of Acinetobacter baumannii (CSAB) bloodstream infections, by adverse outcomes (all-cause in-hospital mortality, or requiring intensive care) Methods We examined consecutive episodes of CRAB or CSAB bloodstream infections in our institution from February 2022 to July 2024. Clinical, laboratory and microbiological data were tabulated, and adverse outcomes were defined as the need for intensive care (ICU) or all-cause in-hospital mortality. We compared i) CRAB to CSAB, and amongst patients with CSAB, ii) examined the parameters associated with adverse outcomes by appropriate univariate and multivariable analyses. Results We identified 71 unique episodes of bacteraemia, of which a majority 52/71 (73.2%) were nosocomial-onset. A minority of were CRAB (15/71, 21.1%). These patients often had ICU-onset, prior carbapenem exposure, and were more likely to experience mortality (73.3% vs 16.1%, p< 0.001). Only a minority of patients 7/71 (9.9%) received dual antibiotic therapy. Amongst the 56 patients with CSAB, only 11/56 (19.6%) experienced adverse outcomes. On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for elevated C-reactive protein, the use of carbapenems as the definitive antibiotic choice remained independently associated with adverse outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 7.34, 95%CI 1.25 – 43.01, p=0.027). Conclusion CSAB was far more common than CRAB in our setting. Prior carbapenem exposure and ICU-onset were important risk factors for CRAB, which had higher mortality than CSAB. Carbapenem-sparing options may be considered as definitive antibiotic choice for CSAB. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
National University Hospital (SG), National University Health System (SG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.