233. Efficacy and safety results from the Phase 2 clinical trial of pritelivir versus foscarnet for treatment of acyclovir-refractory and/or resistant mucocutaneous HSV infections in immunocompromised subjects

Abstract Background Treatment of herpes simplex viruses (HSV-1 or HSV-2) mucocutaneous infections in the immunocompromised (IC) host can be difficult due to refractory and/or acyclovir-resistant (ACV R/R) infection. Drug-resistant HSV infection occurs in up to 14% of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and up to 7% in persons with HIV infection. Foscarnet is the only FDA-approved agent for ACV R/R HSV infection. While effective, foscarnet is associated with significant toxicity including nephrotoxicity and electrolyte disturbances necessitating hospitalization for treatment. Pritelivir is an investigational novel viral helicase primase inhibitor active against ACV and foscarnet-resistant HSV. Pritelivir showed a statistically significant reduction in viral shedding and clinical lesions in healthy persons with genital HSV-2 infection, compared to valacyclovir. We report the efficacy and safety of oral pritelivir versus foscarnet in a Phase 2 randomized, open label, multi-center comparative trial for the treatment of ACV R/R HSV in IC host; additional subjects received open label pritelivir for foscarnet resistant /intolerance (R/I) infection. Methods In Part A, immunocompromised adult subjects with ACV-R/R HSV infection were randomized (2:1) to oral pritelivir (100 mg orally once daily, following a loading dose of 400 mg on Day 1) or IV foscarnet (120mg/kg/day divided every 8 or 12 hrs) for up to 28 days. In Part B, subjects with foscarnet R/I infection received open label pritelivir. Healing rate defined as complete epithelization of lesions, and safety were assessed up to Day 28. Results In Part A, 22 subjects were randomized, n=15 to pritelivir and n=7 to foscarnet. Part B enrolled 8 subjects. 40% of patients were immunocompromised due HIV and 47% due to transplant. In Part A, 14 of 15 (93%) in the pritelivir arm and 4 of 7 (57%) in the foscarnet arm healed (95% CI -10,74), (p=0.0766). In Part B, 5 of 8 (62.6%) with foscarnet R/I HSV infection healed. Treatment emergent adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were more common for foscarnet (43%) versus pritelivir (4%). Conclusion Pritelivir represents a promising oral anti-HSV agent for the treatment of refractory or resistant HSV infection in immunocompromised patients and is currently in a Phase 3 trial (NCT03073967). Disclosures Alexander Birkmann, PhD, AiCuris Anti-Infectives Cures AG: Employee|AiCuris Anti-Infectives Cures AG: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Roy F. Chemaly, MD/MPH, ADMA Biologics, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|AiCuris Anti-Infective Cures AG: Advisor/Consultant|AiCuris Anti-Infective Cures AG: Grant/Research Support|Ansun Biopharma Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Ansun Biopharma Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Assembly Bioscience: Advisor/Consultant|Astellas Pharma Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Eurofins-Viracor: Advisor/Consultant|Eurofins-Viracor: Grant/Research Support|Eurofins-Viracor: Honoraria|Gilead Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Invivyd, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Karius Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Karius Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Merck and Company, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Merck and Company, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Merck and Company, Inc.: Honoraria|Moderna, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer Pharmaceutc: Advisor/Consultant|Roche/Genentech: Grant/Research Support|SHIONOGI and CO., LTD.: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda Pharmaceutical: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda Pharmaceutical: Grant/Research Support|Tether: Advisor/Consultant

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.085
Primary Topic
Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

233. Efficacy and safety results from the Phase 2 clinical trial of pritelivir versus foscarnet for treatment of acyclovir-refractory and/or resistant mucocutaneous HSV infections in immunocompromised subjects

Anna P. Wald, Camille N. Kotton, Robin Kimiko Avery, Alexander Birkmann et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
article

233. Efficacy and safety results from the Phase 2 clinical trial of pritelivir versus foscarnet for treatment of acyclovir-refractory and/or resistant mucocutaneous HSV infections in immunocompromised subjects

Anna P. Wald, Camille N. Kotton, Robin Kimiko Avery, Alexander Birkmann, Melanie Sumner, Chandrasekar Ph, Pallavi Kumar, Cynthia Wat, Bernadette Surujbally, Mayur Ramesh, Kimberly Workowski, Roy F Chemaly, Joerg Albrecht
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Treatment of herpes simplex viruses (HSV-1 or HSV-2) mucocutaneous infections in the immunocompromised (IC) host can be difficult due to refractory and/or acyclovir-resistant (ACV R/R) infection. Drug-resistant HSV infection occurs in up to 14% of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and up to 7% in persons with HIV infection. Foscarnet is the only FDA-approved agent for ACV R/R HSV infection. While effective, foscarnet is associated with significant toxicity including nephrotoxicity and electrolyte disturbances necessitating hospitalization for treatment. Pritelivir is an investigational novel viral helicase primase inhibitor active against ACV and foscarnet-resistant HSV. Pritelivir showed a statistically significant reduction in viral shedding and clinical lesions in healthy persons with genital HSV-2 infection, compared to valacyclovir. We report the efficacy and safety of oral pritelivir versus foscarnet in a Phase 2 randomized, open label, multi-center comparative trial for the treatment of ACV R/R HSV in IC host; additional subjects received open label pritelivir for foscarnet resistant /intolerance (R/I) infection. Methods In Part A, immunocompromised adult subjects with ACV-R/R HSV infection were randomized (2:1) to oral pritelivir (100 mg orally once daily, following a loading dose of 400 mg on Day 1) or IV foscarnet (120mg/kg/day divided every 8 or 12 hrs) for up to 28 days. In Part B, subjects with foscarnet R/I infection received open label pritelivir. Healing rate defined as complete epithelization of lesions, and safety were assessed up to Day 28. Results In Part A, 22 subjects were randomized, n=15 to pritelivir and n=7 to foscarnet. Part B enrolled 8 subjects. 40% of patients were immunocompromised due HIV and 47% due to transplant. In Part A, 14 of 15 (93%) in the pritelivir arm and 4 of 7 (57%) in the foscarnet arm healed (95% CI -10,74), (p=0.0766). In Part B, 5 of 8 (62.6%) with foscarnet R/I HSV infection healed. Treatment emergent adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were more common for foscarnet (43%) versus pritelivir (4%). Conclusion Pritelivir represents a promising oral anti-HSV agent for the treatment of refractory or resistant HSV infection in immunocompromised patients and is currently in a Phase 3 trial (NCT03073967). Disclosures Alexander Birkmann, PhD, AiCuris Anti-Infectives Cures AG: Employee|AiCuris Anti-Infectives Cures AG: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Roy F. Chemaly, MD/MPH, ADMA Biologics, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|AiCuris Anti-Infective Cures AG: Advisor/Consultant|AiCuris Anti-Infective Cures AG: Grant/Research Support|Ansun Biopharma Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Ansun Biopharma Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Assembly Bioscience: Advisor/Consultant|Astellas Pharma Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Eurofins-Viracor: Advisor/Consultant|Eurofins-Viracor: Grant/Research Support|Eurofins-Viracor: Honoraria|Gilead Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Invivyd, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Karius Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Karius Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Merck and Company, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Merck and Company, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Merck and Company, Inc.: Honoraria|Moderna, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer Pharmaceutc: Advisor/Consultant|Roche/Genentech: Grant/Research Support|SHIONOGI and CO., LTD.: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda Pharmaceutical: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda Pharmaceutical: Grant/Research Support|Tether: Advisor/Consultant

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Emory University (US), Georgetown University (US), Wayne State University (US), University of Washington (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), AiCuris (Germany) (DE), Cook County Health and Hospitals System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.