Sanctions, Trade, and Growth: Empirical Analysis

Abstract: This paper investigates the macroeconomic consequences of United States’ and European Union’s sanctions on major targeted economies, focusing on China and Russia over the period 2010–2023. While sanctions have become an increasingly prominent tool of geopolitical strategy, empirical evidence on their contemporary economic effects remains limited. Using a harmonized country-year panel dataset and an original sanction-intensity index capturing trade, financial, sectoral, and technology restrictions, the study employs multiple complementary identification strategies—descriptive contrasts, staggered Difference-in-Differences estimators, dynamic event-study models, and dose–response regressions—to isolate the impact of sanctions on trade openness, trade values, and GDP growth. The findings indicate that sanctions significantly reduce trade-to-GDP ratios and slow economic growth in sanctioned countries, with heterogeneous magnitudes: Russia experiences large and persistent declines, while China shows moderate but measurable contraction, reflecting differences in trade structure and adaptability. The United States, as a sanctioning rather than sanctioned economy, displays negligible macroeconomic exposure. Dose–response estimates reveal a convex relationship in which higher sanction intensity yields disproportionately larger economic losses, particularly for Russia. The study contributes to the sanctions literature by integrating modern causal methods with a comparative framework and by highlighting the nonlinear and asymmetric nature of sanction effects. Policy implications underscore the importance of targeted design, enforcement credibility, and the need for sanctioned economies to pursue diversification, technological self-reliance, and financial resilience. The paper concludes with directions for future research on micro-level adjustment, global spillovers, and advanced identification strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18214858
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sanctions, Trade, and Growth: Empirical Analysis

Brij Behari Dave
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Sanctions, Trade, and Growth: Empirical Analysis

Brij Behari Dave
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This paper investigates the macroeconomic consequences of United States’ and European Union’s sanctions on major targeted economies, focusing on China and Russia over the period 2010–2023. While sanctions have become an increasingly prominent tool of geopolitical strategy, empirical evidence on their contemporary economic effects remains limited. Using a harmonized country-year panel dataset and an original sanction-intensity index capturing trade, financial, sectoral, and technology restrictions, the study employs multiple complementary identification strategies—descriptive contrasts, staggered Difference-in-Differences estimators, dynamic event-study models, and dose–response regressions—to isolate the impact of sanctions on trade openness, trade values, and GDP growth. The findings indicate that sanctions significantly reduce trade-to-GDP ratios and slow economic growth in sanctioned countries, with heterogeneous magnitudes: Russia experiences large and persistent declines, while China shows moderate but measurable contraction, reflecting differences in trade structure and adaptability. The United States, as a sanctioning rather than sanctioned economy, displays negligible macroeconomic exposure. Dose–response estimates reveal a convex relationship in which higher sanction intensity yields disproportionately larger economic losses, particularly for Russia. The study contributes to the sanctions literature by integrating modern causal methods with a comparative framework and by highlighting the nonlinear and asymmetric nature of sanction effects. Policy implications underscore the importance of targeted design, enforcement credibility, and the need for sanctioned economies to pursue diversification, technological self-reliance, and financial resilience. The paper concludes with directions for future research on micro-level adjustment, global spillovers, and advanced identification strategies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.