P-2136. Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancies: Incidence Across Clinical Scenarios

Abstract Background Blood culture (BCx) diagnostic stewardship is key to maximizing diagnostic utility while reducing inefficient use of health resources without compromising patient outcomes. Current BCx algorithms rely on bloodstream infection (BSI) incidence to guide clinical decision-making, yet most studies informing these protocols are limited to immunocompetent populations. Given the unique risks faced by patients with hematologic malignancies, we sought to determine the incidence of BSI across various clinical indications in this cohort. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review at an academic medical center from 10/2023-2/2024, analyzing all consecutive BCxs obtained in the hematologic malignancy inpatient and outpatient units. Using a standardized adjudication process, we categorized BCx results as negative, true positive, or contaminant. The primary objective was to assess BSI incidence across different clinical scenarios. Results 1,511 BCxs were collected during the study period. The most common diagnoses in patients who had BCx sampling included acute myeloid leukemia (518, 34.3%), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (259, 17.1%), and multiple myeloma (245, 16.2%). The majority BCxs were performed inpatient (1368, 90.5%). Among these, 1,479 (97.9%) were standard anaerobic/aerobic cultures, 32 (1.1%) were fungal/mycobacterial cultures. The most common indications for BCxs were neutropenic fever (655, 43.3%), non-neutropenic fever (180, 11.9%), and assessment for clearance of bloodstream infection (123, 8.1%). Overall, 1,373 (90.9%) cultures were negative, 121 (8.0%) were true positives, and 17 (1.8%) were contaminants. The highest true positive rates were observed for skin/soft tissue or bone infections (10, 18.2%), assessment for clearance of bacteremia (20, 16.3%), and non-neutropenic fever (21, 11.7%). None of the 32 fungal/mycobacterial cultures yielded positive results. Conclusion Our study provides an updated assessment of BSI incidence in patients with hematologic malignancies, highlighting key clinical scenarios where BCxs are most likely to yield true positives. These findings can inform future efforts to refine BCx diagnostic stewardship in this high-risk population, ensuring that testing strategies are both effective and judicious. Disclosures Jessica Seidelman, MD, MPH, 3M: Expert Testimony|Nichols & Associates: Expert Testimony|osteal: Advisor/Consultant|UptoDate: Content Contributor Julia A. Messina, MD, MHS MS, Seres: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate: Royalties Jennifer Saullo, MD, Pharm D, RMEI Medical Education: Honoraria|UpToDate: Royalties

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2300
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2136. Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancies: Incidence Across Clinical Scenarios

Alicia M. Gray, Patrick Tam, Julia A. Messina, Jennifer L. Saullo et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

P-2136. Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancies: Incidence Across Clinical Scenarios

Alicia M. Gray, Patrick Tam, Julia A. Messina, Jennifer L. Saullo, Jonathan Huggins, Kimberiey Milliam, JoAnn Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Blood culture (BCx) diagnostic stewardship is key to maximizing diagnostic utility while reducing inefficient use of health resources without compromising patient outcomes. Current BCx algorithms rely on bloodstream infection (BSI) incidence to guide clinical decision-making, yet most studies informing these protocols are limited to immunocompetent populations. Given the unique risks faced by patients with hematologic malignancies, we sought to determine the incidence of BSI across various clinical indications in this cohort. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review at an academic medical center from 10/2023-2/2024, analyzing all consecutive BCxs obtained in the hematologic malignancy inpatient and outpatient units. Using a standardized adjudication process, we categorized BCx results as negative, true positive, or contaminant. The primary objective was to assess BSI incidence across different clinical scenarios. Results 1,511 BCxs were collected during the study period. The most common diagnoses in patients who had BCx sampling included acute myeloid leukemia (518, 34.3%), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (259, 17.1%), and multiple myeloma (245, 16.2%). The majority BCxs were performed inpatient (1368, 90.5%). Among these, 1,479 (97.9%) were standard anaerobic/aerobic cultures, 32 (1.1%) were fungal/mycobacterial cultures. The most common indications for BCxs were neutropenic fever (655, 43.3%), non-neutropenic fever (180, 11.9%), and assessment for clearance of bloodstream infection (123, 8.1%). Overall, 1,373 (90.9%) cultures were negative, 121 (8.0%) were true positives, and 17 (1.8%) were contaminants. The highest true positive rates were observed for skin/soft tissue or bone infections (10, 18.2%), assessment for clearance of bacteremia (20, 16.3%), and non-neutropenic fever (21, 11.7%). None of the 32 fungal/mycobacterial cultures yielded positive results. Conclusion Our study provides an updated assessment of BSI incidence in patients with hematologic malignancies, highlighting key clinical scenarios where BCxs are most likely to yield true positives. These findings can inform future efforts to refine BCx diagnostic stewardship in this high-risk population, ensuring that testing strategies are both effective and judicious. Disclosures Jessica Seidelman, MD, MPH, 3M: Expert Testimony|Nichols & Associates: Expert Testimony|osteal: Advisor/Consultant|UptoDate: Content Contributor Julia A. Messina, MD, MHS MS, Seres: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate: Royalties Jennifer Saullo, MD, Pharm D, RMEI Medical Education: Honoraria|UpToDate: Royalties

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Duke University (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.