P-1879. Journal Club Revitalization Initiative at an Academic Infectious Disease Fellowship Program from 2024-2025

Abstract Background Journal Club (JC) has served as an integral part of medical education for over 150 years. JC was introduced at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) in 1962 and has evolved over the years. An initiative to improve JC quality, variety and participation was performed, including alternative formats. The aim of this study was to assess revitalization initiatives introduced for JC in 2024. Methods We distributed a pre-intervention 9-question satisfaction survey in April 2024 to faculty and fellows within our Infectious Disease (ID) division. A ‘journal club restructure’ committee elected to adopt alternative formats, including ‘Landmark’, ‘Debate’, and ‘Deep-dive’ sessions. Following these measures in 2024-2025, a 13-question post-intervention survey was distributed, including the original 9 questions, with an additional 4 questions aimed at assessing the interventions. Results There were 14 pre-intervention survey responses. JC experiences were mixed between fair, neutral and good. Self-rated participation in JC was low and moderate. Most respondents (71%) felt the best way to improve JC was to utilize different formats. There were 21 post-intervention survey responses. A vast majority of respondents (95%) had improved satisfaction with JC. Most felt the addition of debate and landmark article sessions were a positive addition (90% and 95%, respectively). In-person attendance did not change. Satisfaction with article quality and discussion improved. Ongoing feedback suggestions included reduction in frequency, increased in-person attendance, and presentation of higher impact articles. Conclusion Our Infectious Disease division implemented changes to JC based on faculty/fellow feedback. Addition of debate and landmark article sessions were both well-received, with over 90% of respondents noting them as valuable additions. There were several notable opportunities for ongoing improvement, including participation and frequency of JC. This change resulted in significant improvement in JC satisfaction. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2048
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1879. Journal Club Revitalization Initiative at an Academic Infectious Disease Fellowship Program from 2024-2025

Rachel Sigler, Charles Walde, Erica MacKenzie, Albert Eid et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Health Sciences Research and Education
article

P-1879. Journal Club Revitalization Initiative at an Academic Infectious Disease Fellowship Program from 2024-2025

Rachel Sigler, Charles Walde, Erica MacKenzie, Albert Eid, Alex Belote
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Journal Club (JC) has served as an integral part of medical education for over 150 years. JC was introduced at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) in 1962 and has evolved over the years. An initiative to improve JC quality, variety and participation was performed, including alternative formats. The aim of this study was to assess revitalization initiatives introduced for JC in 2024. Methods We distributed a pre-intervention 9-question satisfaction survey in April 2024 to faculty and fellows within our Infectious Disease (ID) division. A ‘journal club restructure’ committee elected to adopt alternative formats, including ‘Landmark’, ‘Debate’, and ‘Deep-dive’ sessions. Following these measures in 2024-2025, a 13-question post-intervention survey was distributed, including the original 9 questions, with an additional 4 questions aimed at assessing the interventions. Results There were 14 pre-intervention survey responses. JC experiences were mixed between fair, neutral and good. Self-rated participation in JC was low and moderate. Most respondents (71%) felt the best way to improve JC was to utilize different formats. There were 21 post-intervention survey responses. A vast majority of respondents (95%) had improved satisfaction with JC. Most felt the addition of debate and landmark article sessions were a positive addition (90% and 95%, respectively). In-person attendance did not change. Satisfaction with article quality and discussion improved. Ongoing feedback suggestions included reduction in frequency, increased in-person attendance, and presentation of higher impact articles. Conclusion Our Infectious Disease division implemented changes to JC based on faculty/fellow feedback. Addition of debate and landmark article sessions were both well-received, with over 90% of respondents noting them as valuable additions. There were several notable opportunities for ongoing improvement, including participation and frequency of JC. This change resulted in significant improvement in JC satisfaction. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
University of Kansas (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Health Sciences Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.