P-1409. Molecular Detection of Tubercular Lymphadenitis: Real World Evidence for a Novel PCR-Based Assay

Abstract Background Tubercular lymphadenitis (LNTB) is the most common form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). GeneXpert Ultra, a cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test, offers advancements over its predecessor, GeneXpert, including a larger reaction chamber and two additional multi-copy amplification target genes, promising to improve diagnostic accuracy. We conducted a two-year prospective observational study to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert Ultra in 55 LNTB patients.Table 1.Diagnostic performance of LN GeneXpert Ultra against CRS : definite LNTBTable 2.Diagnostic performance of LN GeneXpert Ultra against CRS: probable+definite LNTB Methods Participants underwent lymph node biopsy and samples obtained were subjected to Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture, Ziehl-Neelsen staining, and cytology/histopathology. Diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert Ultra was assessed against a composite reference standard (CRS) incorporating clinical, histopathological, and microbiological findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of Ultra were calculated against both CRS and MGIT culture Results Fifty-five participants were included (mean age 33.1 years; 55% female). Ultra was positive in 22 (40%) cases. Against MGIT culture, Ultra showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 64.7%, PPV of 18.2%, and NPV of 100%. However, MGIT culture positivity was low (7.2%), consistent with prior studies reporting low culture yields in lymph node tuberculosis due to paucibacillary samples. Therefore, diagnostic performance was primarily assessed against CRS. Ultra showed a sensitivity of 61.1% (95% CI 43.5–76.9) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 82.3–100), against CRS (confirmed + probable LNTB), with a PPV of 100% and an NPV of 57.6%.When restricted to CRS-confirmed LNTB cases alone, Ultra demonstrated a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI 51.6–97.9) and specificity of 72.1% (95% CI 56.3–84.7) Conclusion GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra demonstrated high specificity and moderate overall sensitivity for diagnosing lymph node tuberculosis, with improved sensitivity among microbiologically confirmed cases. Despite low MGIT culture positivity, Ultra outperformed culture in case detection and represents a valuable diagnostic tool in paucibacillary tubercular lymphadenitis when interpreted alongside clinical and histopathological findings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1596
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1409. Molecular Detection of Tubercular Lymphadenitis: Real World Evidence for a Novel PCR-Based Assay

Animesh Ray, Nihar Ranjan Nayak, M Soneja, Sandeep Rao Kordcal et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
article

P-1409. Molecular Detection of Tubercular Lymphadenitis: Real World Evidence for a Novel PCR-Based Assay

Animesh Ray, Nihar Ranjan Nayak, M Soneja, Sandeep Rao Kordcal, Naveet Wig, Prayas Sethi, Pankaj Jorwal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Tubercular lymphadenitis (LNTB) is the most common form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). GeneXpert Ultra, a cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test, offers advancements over its predecessor, GeneXpert, including a larger reaction chamber and two additional multi-copy amplification target genes, promising to improve diagnostic accuracy. We conducted a two-year prospective observational study to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert Ultra in 55 LNTB patients.Table 1.Diagnostic performance of LN GeneXpert Ultra against CRS : definite LNTBTable 2.Diagnostic performance of LN GeneXpert Ultra against CRS: probable+definite LNTB Methods Participants underwent lymph node biopsy and samples obtained were subjected to Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture, Ziehl-Neelsen staining, and cytology/histopathology. Diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert Ultra was assessed against a composite reference standard (CRS) incorporating clinical, histopathological, and microbiological findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of Ultra were calculated against both CRS and MGIT culture Results Fifty-five participants were included (mean age 33.1 years; 55% female). Ultra was positive in 22 (40%) cases. Against MGIT culture, Ultra showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 64.7%, PPV of 18.2%, and NPV of 100%. However, MGIT culture positivity was low (7.2%), consistent with prior studies reporting low culture yields in lymph node tuberculosis due to paucibacillary samples. Therefore, diagnostic performance was primarily assessed against CRS. Ultra showed a sensitivity of 61.1% (95% CI 43.5–76.9) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 82.3–100), against CRS (confirmed + probable LNTB), with a PPV of 100% and an NPV of 57.6%.When restricted to CRS-confirmed LNTB cases alone, Ultra demonstrated a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI 51.6–97.9) and specificity of 72.1% (95% CI 56.3–84.7) Conclusion GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra demonstrated high specificity and moderate overall sensitivity for diagnosing lymph node tuberculosis, with improved sensitivity among microbiologically confirmed cases. Despite low MGIT culture positivity, Ultra outperformed culture in case detection and represents a valuable diagnostic tool in paucibacillary tubercular lymphadenitis when interpreted alongside clinical and histopathological findings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.