P-1444. Safety and Long-Term Immunogenicity of Yellow Fever Vaccine in Elderly Korean Travelers: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract Background Yellow fever (YF) remains endemic in parts of Africa and South America. Although the YF vaccine, derived from the 17D strain, is highly effective, concerns remain regarding its safety and immunogenicity in elderly individuals over 60 years old. WHO classifies YF vaccination in this age group as a relative contraindication, recommending that healthcare providers carefully weigh the risks and benefits with recipients. As international travel from Korea to YF-endemic areas rises, including among older adults, data are needed to guide vaccination in this population.Figure 1.Comparison of (A) Humoral (YFV-gE Ab Titer) and (B) Cellular (IFN-γ ELISPOT) Immune Response Between in <60 and ≥60 age groups at a time point exceeding five years post-vaccination.. Methods We retrospectively reviewed adults vaccinated against YF at Pusan National University Hospital between September 2016 and January 2020. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed via telephone interviews. A subset of recipients underwent blood sampling for humoral and cellular immune response testing in 2024. Anti-YFV envelope IgG titers were measured by ELISA, and cellular responses were assessed via IFN-γ ELISPOT assays. Participants were grouped by age (< 60 vs. ≥60 years) for comparative analysis. A comparison of each group was performed using the Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon unpaired test and results were considered significant at P < 0.05. Results Among 1,021 vaccinees, 691 (67.7%) were aged ≥60 years. No serious AEs were reported at the time of vaccination. Of the 454 individuals (44.5%) who completed telephone follow-up, 6 (1.3%) reported mild AEs (febrile sensation in 4; myalgia in 2) and no serious AE. Seventy-one individuals underwent immunogenicity assessment at a time point exceeding five years post-vaccination, with a median age of 62 years (49.3% male), including 44 individuals aged ≥60 years. Median log anti-YFV IgG titer was 3.83 (IQR, 3.55–4.25) in the elderly vs. 3.77 (IQR, 3.47–3.94) in the non-elderly (P = 0.55) (Figure 1). Median IFN-γ ELISPOT responses were 17.50 (IQR, 0–50.83) in the elderly vs. 15.00 (IQR, 1.67–146.7) in the non-elderly (P = 0.67) (Figure 1B). Conclusion Yellow fever vaccination was well tolerated with no serious adverse events and preserved humoral and cellular immune responses in older adults. These findings support the safe use of YF vaccine in elderly Korean travelers, particularly when benefits outweigh risks in endemic-area travel. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1630
Primary Topic
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1444. Safety and Long-Term Immunogenicity of Yellow Fever Vaccine in Elderly Korean Travelers: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Soon Ok Lee, Suhyeon Heo, Sun Hee Lee, Jihyun Yang et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
article

P-1444. Safety and Long-Term Immunogenicity of Yellow Fever Vaccine in Elderly Korean Travelers: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Soon Ok Lee, Suhyeon Heo, Sun Hee Lee, Jihyun Yang, Soon Ok Lee, Kye-Hyung Kim, Shinwon Lee, Sohee Park, Chae-Lim Song
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Yellow fever (YF) remains endemic in parts of Africa and South America. Although the YF vaccine, derived from the 17D strain, is highly effective, concerns remain regarding its safety and immunogenicity in elderly individuals over 60 years old. WHO classifies YF vaccination in this age group as a relative contraindication, recommending that healthcare providers carefully weigh the risks and benefits with recipients. As international travel from Korea to YF-endemic areas rises, including among older adults, data are needed to guide vaccination in this population.Figure 1.Comparison of (A) Humoral (YFV-gE Ab Titer) and (B) Cellular (IFN-γ ELISPOT) Immune Response Between in <60 and ≥60 age groups at a time point exceeding five years post-vaccination.. Methods We retrospectively reviewed adults vaccinated against YF at Pusan National University Hospital between September 2016 and January 2020. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed via telephone interviews. A subset of recipients underwent blood sampling for humoral and cellular immune response testing in 2024. Anti-YFV envelope IgG titers were measured by ELISA, and cellular responses were assessed via IFN-γ ELISPOT assays. Participants were grouped by age (< 60 vs. ≥60 years) for comparative analysis. A comparison of each group was performed using the Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon unpaired test and results were considered significant at P < 0.05. Results Among 1,021 vaccinees, 691 (67.7%) were aged ≥60 years. No serious AEs were reported at the time of vaccination. Of the 454 individuals (44.5%) who completed telephone follow-up, 6 (1.3%) reported mild AEs (febrile sensation in 4; myalgia in 2) and no serious AE. Seventy-one individuals underwent immunogenicity assessment at a time point exceeding five years post-vaccination, with a median age of 62 years (49.3% male), including 44 individuals aged ≥60 years. Median log anti-YFV IgG titer was 3.83 (IQR, 3.55–4.25) in the elderly vs. 3.77 (IQR, 3.47–3.94) in the non-elderly (P = 0.55) (Figure 1). Median IFN-γ ELISPOT responses were 17.50 (IQR, 0–50.83) in the elderly vs. 15.00 (IQR, 1.67–146.7) in the non-elderly (P = 0.67) (Figure 1B). Conclusion Yellow fever vaccination was well tolerated with no serious adverse events and preserved humoral and cellular immune responses in older adults. These findings support the safe use of YF vaccine in elderly Korean travelers, particularly when benefits outweigh risks in endemic-area travel. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Pusan National University Hospital (KR), Pusan National University (KR), Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.