P-1380. Comparative Study Of Fixed-Dose Combinations Versus Separate Tablets In The Treatment Of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis

Abstract Background Tuberculosis remains a major global public health challenge. To minimize treatment failure and the emergence of drug resistance, the World Health Organization recommends the use of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) for antituberculosis therapy. This study aimed to study the efficacy and tolerability of FDCs in comparison with separate tablets in the management of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Methods We conducted a retrospective study including all patients hospitalized for extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the infectious diseases department between 2000 and 2024. Patients were treated with either FDCs or separate tablets. Results We encountered 562 cases, among whom 358 (63.7%) were women. The mean age was 40 ± 19 years. In total, 241 patients (42.9%) received FDCs and 321 patients (57.1%) received separate tablets. Gastrointestinal adverse events, including vomiting (5.3% vs 0.4%; p = 0.001) and abdominal pain (6.5% vs 2.5%; p = 0.026), as well as neurological symptoms (14.3% vs 3.7%; p < 0.001), were significantly more frequent among patients receiving separate tablets. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding cutaneous reactions (6.2% vs 8.7%; p = 0.26), hematological abnormalities (2.8% vs 4.5%; p = 0.29), or hepatic cytolysis (14.6% vs 17.4%; p = 0.37). Clinical outcomes were more favorable in the FDC group, with lower rates of complications (13.3% vs 25.9%; p < 0.001), sequelae (9.5% vs 16.5%; p = 0.017), and relapse (2.1% vs 5.9%; p = 0.031). Cure rates (92.2% vs 90%; p = 0.36) and mortality (2.8% vs 1.2%; p = 0.21) were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion Treatment of extrapulmonary tuberculosis with FDCs was associated with less neurological and gastrointestinal adverse events and improved clinical outcomes compared to separate tablet therapy. These findings support the preferential use of FDCs to optimize treatment tolerability and reduce relapse rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1567
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1380. Comparative Study Of Fixed-Dose Combinations Versus Separate Tablets In The Treatment Of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis

Makram Koubaa, Ben Jemâa M, khaoula Rekik, Amal Chakroun et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

P-1380. Comparative Study Of Fixed-Dose Combinations Versus Separate Tablets In The Treatment Of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis

Makram Koubaa, Ben Jemâa M, khaoula Rekik, Amal Chakroun, Fatma Smaoui, Fatma Hammami, Chakib Marrakchi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Tuberculosis remains a major global public health challenge. To minimize treatment failure and the emergence of drug resistance, the World Health Organization recommends the use of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) for antituberculosis therapy. This study aimed to study the efficacy and tolerability of FDCs in comparison with separate tablets in the management of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Methods We conducted a retrospective study including all patients hospitalized for extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the infectious diseases department between 2000 and 2024. Patients were treated with either FDCs or separate tablets. Results We encountered 562 cases, among whom 358 (63.7%) were women. The mean age was 40 ± 19 years. In total, 241 patients (42.9%) received FDCs and 321 patients (57.1%) received separate tablets. Gastrointestinal adverse events, including vomiting (5.3% vs 0.4%; p = 0.001) and abdominal pain (6.5% vs 2.5%; p = 0.026), as well as neurological symptoms (14.3% vs 3.7%; p < 0.001), were significantly more frequent among patients receiving separate tablets. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding cutaneous reactions (6.2% vs 8.7%; p = 0.26), hematological abnormalities (2.8% vs 4.5%; p = 0.29), or hepatic cytolysis (14.6% vs 17.4%; p = 0.37). Clinical outcomes were more favorable in the FDC group, with lower rates of complications (13.3% vs 25.9%; p < 0.001), sequelae (9.5% vs 16.5%; p = 0.017), and relapse (2.1% vs 5.9%; p = 0.031). Cure rates (92.2% vs 90%; p = 0.36) and mortality (2.8% vs 1.2%; p = 0.21) were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion Treatment of extrapulmonary tuberculosis with FDCs was associated with less neurological and gastrointestinal adverse events and improved clinical outcomes compared to separate tablet therapy. These findings support the preferential use of FDCs to optimize treatment tolerability and reduce relapse rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Hopital Universitaire Hedi Chaker (TN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.