P-1341. Monotherapy with Trimethroprim/Sulfamethoxazole or Minocycline for the Treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

Abstract Background Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and minocycline (MINO) are both recommended for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, however, there is a lack of comparative clinical data and IDSA guidance recommends against the use of monotherapy with any agent. The objective of this study was to assess clinical outcomes between patients treated with TMP/SMX or MINO monotherapy for infections due to S. maltophilia.Table 1.Patient and Treatment CharacteristicsFIgure 1.Mortality Outcomes Methods This is a retrospective cohort study from 8/20/19 to 2/19/24. Adult patients with clinical signs of infection; a culture growing S. maltophilia; and who received TMP/SMX or MINO ≥ 48 hours were included. Patients were excluded if they received combination therapy; had a non-susceptible S. maltophilia isolate; died or were transferred to hospice within 48 hrs of treatment; or had S. maltophilia isolated from the urine. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, microbiological cure and clinical response at the end of therapy (EOT), and acute kidney injury.Table 2.Other Clinical Outcomes Results A total of 109 patients were included (TMP/SMX=59; MINO=50). A majority of patients were male (64%) and African American (65%). The median age was 57 years (46-66) for TMP/SMX and 64 years (44-72) for MINO, p=0.22. SOFA score (5 vs. 4, p=0.97) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 4, p=0.07) were similar between TMP/SMX and MINO, respectively. The most common source of infection in both groups was pneumonia (74% vs. 83%, p=0.25). A majority of cultures were polymicrobial (80% vs. 66%, p=0.11). The median TMP/SMX dose was 11 mg/kg (7.5-14.7 mg/kg), and the median MINO dose was 200mg/day. The median duration of therapy was 7 days in both groups. There was no difference in 28-day all-cause mortality (25% vs. 20%, p=0.50), in-hospital mortality (31% vs. 32%, p=0.87), microbiological cure at EOT (43% vs. 50%, p=0.63), and clinical response at EOT (63% vs. 62%, p=0.94) for TMP/SMX and MINO, respectively. Nephrotoxicity occurred in 15% of TMP/SMX and 33% of MINO patients (p=0.30) with more patients developing failure in the MINO group (2% vs. 21%, p=0.005). Conclusion TMP/SMX had similar rates of mortality and clinical outcomes when compared to MINO for the treatment of S. maltophilia. Further studies should be conducted to confirm the findings of this study. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1529
Primary Topic
Infections and bacterial resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1341. Monotherapy with Trimethroprim/Sulfamethoxazole or Minocycline for the Treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

Amima Mahmood, Marco R. Scipione, Shannon Olson, Alex L. Huang et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Infections and bacterial resistance
article

P-1341. Monotherapy with Trimethroprim/Sulfamethoxazole or Minocycline for the Treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

Amima Mahmood, Marco R. Scipione, Shannon Olson, Alex L. Huang, Paige Roberts, Jing Zhao, Zakery Kujat
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and minocycline (MINO) are both recommended for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, however, there is a lack of comparative clinical data and IDSA guidance recommends against the use of monotherapy with any agent. The objective of this study was to assess clinical outcomes between patients treated with TMP/SMX or MINO monotherapy for infections due to S. maltophilia.Table 1.Patient and Treatment CharacteristicsFIgure 1.Mortality Outcomes Methods This is a retrospective cohort study from 8/20/19 to 2/19/24. Adult patients with clinical signs of infection; a culture growing S. maltophilia; and who received TMP/SMX or MINO ≥ 48 hours were included. Patients were excluded if they received combination therapy; had a non-susceptible S. maltophilia isolate; died or were transferred to hospice within 48 hrs of treatment; or had S. maltophilia isolated from the urine. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, microbiological cure and clinical response at the end of therapy (EOT), and acute kidney injury.Table 2.Other Clinical Outcomes Results A total of 109 patients were included (TMP/SMX=59; MINO=50). A majority of patients were male (64%) and African American (65%). The median age was 57 years (46-66) for TMP/SMX and 64 years (44-72) for MINO, p=0.22. SOFA score (5 vs. 4, p=0.97) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 4, p=0.07) were similar between TMP/SMX and MINO, respectively. The most common source of infection in both groups was pneumonia (74% vs. 83%, p=0.25). A majority of cultures were polymicrobial (80% vs. 66%, p=0.11). The median TMP/SMX dose was 11 mg/kg (7.5-14.7 mg/kg), and the median MINO dose was 200mg/day. The median duration of therapy was 7 days in both groups. There was no difference in 28-day all-cause mortality (25% vs. 20%, p=0.50), in-hospital mortality (31% vs. 32%, p=0.87), microbiological cure at EOT (43% vs. 50%, p=0.63), and clinical response at EOT (63% vs. 62%, p=0.94) for TMP/SMX and MINO, respectively. Nephrotoxicity occurred in 15% of TMP/SMX and 33% of MINO patients (p=0.30) with more patients developing failure in the MINO group (2% vs. 21%, p=0.005). Conclusion TMP/SMX had similar rates of mortality and clinical outcomes when compared to MINO for the treatment of S. maltophilia. Further studies should be conducted to confirm the findings of this study. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Detroit Medical Center (US), Sinai Hospital (US), Sinai Grace Hospital (US), Harper University Hospital (US), Detroit Receiving Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Infections and bacterial resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.