P-1004. Vancomycin Susceptibility Determination for Clostridioides difficile Varies by Brucella Agar Brand and Composition

Abstract Background Agar dilution is the gold standard method for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Clostridioides difficile. Ensuring the accuracy and interlaboratory reproducibility of this method is critical, particularly in light of recent reports of isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and fidaxomicin, the two primary treatments for C. difficile infection. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends using Brucella agar supplemented with hemin and vitamin K1. We performed a multi-laboratory evaluation to investigate whether using different commercially available Brucella agars influences vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) obtained by agar dilution.Table 1.Reference agar dilution results obtained by three independent laboratoriesVancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 30 clinical isolates and one QC strain were determined using six different Brucella agar formulations (A1-6): two pre-mixed with hemin and vitamin K1 (A3 and A6) and four supplemented with hemin and vitamin K1 according to CLSI recommendations (A1, A2, A4, and A5). MICs >2 log2 dilutions from the median MIC are shown in bold.MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; EA, essential agreement (i.e., within ±1 log2 of the median MIC); NWT, non-wild type (MIC > 2 µg/ml); ATCC, American Type Culture Collection Methods Reference agar dilution testing of 30 C. difficile clinical isolates and one Quality Control (QC) strain (ATCC 700057) was performed at each of three participating laboratories. Six Brucella agars from four different manufacturers were tested (A1-6): two agars preformulated with hemin and vitamin K1 (A3 and A6) and four supplemented by each laboratory according to CLSI recommendations (A1, A2, A4, and A5). Results For five agars, interlaboratory reproducibility was high ( >90% essential agreement [EA] to median MIC at each lab, Table 1). Poor reproducibility was observed for A5 (Lab 3: 64.5% EA). For all labs, A3 and A6 resulted in 3-4-fold higher geometric mean MICs compared to A1, A2, and A4. In contrast, geometric mean MICs obtained with A5 varied between labs (4.19, 2.99, 1.23 µg/ml). Using the CLSI epidemiological cutoff for C. difficile and vancomycin, the proportion of non-wild type (NWT) isolates (i.e., MIC >2 µg/ml) ranged from 3.2-12.9% for A1, A2, and A4, whereas a higher proportion was observed for A3, A5, and A6 (9.7-100% NWT). Despite these differences, QC strain results for all labs were within the CLSI-established range. Conclusion Our observation that agar composition may influence whether an isolate exhibits an elevated MIC to vancomycin is concerning. Because agar dilution testing results are used to identify emerging resistance and inform empirical treatment guidelines, standardization of this method is crucial. To ensure reliable results and interlaboratory comparability going forward, the methodology and QC ranges may need to be revisited. Disclosures Andrew M. Skinner, MD, Recursion Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1201
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1004. Vancomycin Susceptibility Determination for Clostridioides difficile Varies by Brucella Agar Brand and Composition

Adam Cheknis, Amy S. Gargis, Michelle Adamczyk, Stuart Johnson et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

P-1004. Vancomycin Susceptibility Determination for Clostridioides difficile Varies by Brucella Agar Brand and Composition

Adam Cheknis, Amy S. Gargis, Michelle Adamczyk, Stuart Johnson, Andrew M Skinner, Giulia Orazi, Claire E. Kaple, Maria Karlsson, Davina Campbell, Megan Taylor, Ashley Paulick, Curtis Donskey, Jennifer Cadnum, Laurica A Petrella
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Agar dilution is the gold standard method for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Clostridioides difficile. Ensuring the accuracy and interlaboratory reproducibility of this method is critical, particularly in light of recent reports of isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and fidaxomicin, the two primary treatments for C. difficile infection. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends using Brucella agar supplemented with hemin and vitamin K1. We performed a multi-laboratory evaluation to investigate whether using different commercially available Brucella agars influences vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) obtained by agar dilution.Table 1.Reference agar dilution results obtained by three independent laboratoriesVancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 30 clinical isolates and one QC strain were determined using six different Brucella agar formulations (A1-6): two pre-mixed with hemin and vitamin K1 (A3 and A6) and four supplemented with hemin and vitamin K1 according to CLSI recommendations (A1, A2, A4, and A5). MICs >2 log2 dilutions from the median MIC are shown in bold.MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; EA, essential agreement (i.e., within ±1 log2 of the median MIC); NWT, non-wild type (MIC > 2 µg/ml); ATCC, American Type Culture Collection Methods Reference agar dilution testing of 30 C. difficile clinical isolates and one Quality Control (QC) strain (ATCC 700057) was performed at each of three participating laboratories. Six Brucella agars from four different manufacturers were tested (A1-6): two agars preformulated with hemin and vitamin K1 (A3 and A6) and four supplemented by each laboratory according to CLSI recommendations (A1, A2, A4, and A5). Results For five agars, interlaboratory reproducibility was high ( >90% essential agreement [EA] to median MIC at each lab, Table 1). Poor reproducibility was observed for A5 (Lab 3: 64.5% EA). For all labs, A3 and A6 resulted in 3-4-fold higher geometric mean MICs compared to A1, A2, and A4. In contrast, geometric mean MICs obtained with A5 varied between labs (4.19, 2.99, 1.23 µg/ml). Using the CLSI epidemiological cutoff for C. difficile and vancomycin, the proportion of non-wild type (NWT) isolates (i.e., MIC >2 µg/ml) ranged from 3.2-12.9% for A1, A2, and A4, whereas a higher proportion was observed for A3, A5, and A6 (9.7-100% NWT). Despite these differences, QC strain results for all labs were within the CLSI-established range. Conclusion Our observation that agar composition may influence whether an isolate exhibits an elevated MIC to vancomycin is concerning. Because agar dilution testing results are used to identify emerging resistance and inform empirical treatment guidelines, standardization of this method is crucial. To ensure reliable results and interlaboratory comparability going forward, the methodology and QC ranges may need to be revisited. Disclosures Andrew M. Skinner, MD, Recursion Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Loyola University Medical Center (US), University of Utah (US), Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US), Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (US), VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System (US), CDC Foundation (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.