P-871. Can We Change What We Do Not Measure? Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns in Wisconsin’s Urgent Care Centers in 2022

Abstract Background Urgent care centers (UCCs) are a fast-growing outpatient healthcare model due to their convenience and affordability; however, most UCCs lack formal antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs. Characterizing antibiotic prescribing is essential for identifying improvement targets. This study examined 2022 antibiotic prescribing patterns in Wisconsin’s UCCs to inform future AMS efforts. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2022 antibiotic prescriptions at UCCs using all-payer claims data from the Wisconsin Health Information Organization. Our cohort included patients who filled ≥ 1 oral antibiotic prescription on or within 3 days of a UCC visit. ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used to identify the indications and grouped into antibiotic appropriateness tiers. Patient characteristics included sex, age, payer type, and region. We used the prescriber national provider identifier (NPI) taxonomy to categorize provider types. Data were curated and analyzed in SAS 9.4 using descriptive statistics. Results The study cohort included 39,546 patients who collectively filled 50,385 antibiotic prescriptions after being seen at one of 388 UCCs in Wisconsin. Of the patients, 61.0% were female, 32.1% were aged 2-12, 55.1% were insured by Medicaid, and nearly half lived in the southern region of Wisconsin (Table 1). The median number of prescriptions per UCC was 24 (IQR: 4.0-87.0), and just 10% of providers (303/3,027) accounted for around 80.0% of all antibiotic prescriptions (n= 40,169). Nurse practitioners prescribed the most (20.5%), followed by family medicine physicians (19.9%) and physician assistants (Figure 1). Over 70.0% of prescriptions were for 5 antibiotics: amoxicillin (28.5%), amoxicillin/clavulanate (22.3%), cephalexin (11.1%), cefdinir (6.4%), and azithromycin (4.5%) (Table 2). The 3 most common associated conditions were otitis media (12.3%), acute pharyngitis (4.7%), and acute sinusitis (3.8%). Nearly 40% of prescriptions were for Tier 3 conditions (Figure 2). Conclusion A minority of UCC providers prescribed the majority of antibiotics, suggesting targeted provider feedback may be a successful stewardship intervention in Wisconsin UCCs. Future studies should incorporate additional prescribing metrics to further guide AMS efforts in UCCs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1079
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-871. Can We Change What We Do Not Measure? Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns in Wisconsin’s Urgent Care Centers in 2022

David Mott, Lindsay Taylor, Sura O AlMahasis, James H Ford
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

P-871. Can We Change What We Do Not Measure? Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns in Wisconsin’s Urgent Care Centers in 2022

David Mott, Lindsay Taylor, Sura O AlMahasis, James H Ford
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Urgent care centers (UCCs) are a fast-growing outpatient healthcare model due to their convenience and affordability; however, most UCCs lack formal antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs. Characterizing antibiotic prescribing is essential for identifying improvement targets. This study examined 2022 antibiotic prescribing patterns in Wisconsin’s UCCs to inform future AMS efforts. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2022 antibiotic prescriptions at UCCs using all-payer claims data from the Wisconsin Health Information Organization. Our cohort included patients who filled ≥ 1 oral antibiotic prescription on or within 3 days of a UCC visit. ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used to identify the indications and grouped into antibiotic appropriateness tiers. Patient characteristics included sex, age, payer type, and region. We used the prescriber national provider identifier (NPI) taxonomy to categorize provider types. Data were curated and analyzed in SAS 9.4 using descriptive statistics. Results The study cohort included 39,546 patients who collectively filled 50,385 antibiotic prescriptions after being seen at one of 388 UCCs in Wisconsin. Of the patients, 61.0% were female, 32.1% were aged 2-12, 55.1% were insured by Medicaid, and nearly half lived in the southern region of Wisconsin (Table 1). The median number of prescriptions per UCC was 24 (IQR: 4.0-87.0), and just 10% of providers (303/3,027) accounted for around 80.0% of all antibiotic prescriptions (n= 40,169). Nurse practitioners prescribed the most (20.5%), followed by family medicine physicians (19.9%) and physician assistants (Figure 1). Over 70.0% of prescriptions were for 5 antibiotics: amoxicillin (28.5%), amoxicillin/clavulanate (22.3%), cephalexin (11.1%), cefdinir (6.4%), and azithromycin (4.5%) (Table 2). The 3 most common associated conditions were otitis media (12.3%), acute pharyngitis (4.7%), and acute sinusitis (3.8%). Nearly 40% of prescriptions were for Tier 3 conditions (Figure 2). Conclusion A minority of UCC providers prescribed the majority of antibiotics, suggesting targeted provider feedback may be a successful stewardship intervention in Wisconsin UCCs. Future studies should incorporate additional prescribing metrics to further guide AMS efforts in UCCs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.