P-2138. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Neurological Dysfunction in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Cefepime or Piperacillin/Tazobactam

Abstract Background Beta-lactam antibiotics are associated with risk for neurotoxicity. Cefepime (FEP) may be more likely to cause neurological dysfunction (ND) due to its ability to cross the blood brain barrier and antagonize GABA receptors. In a secondary analysis, a recent randomized trial of FEP vs piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) found a relatively higher rate of ND among patients receiving FEP. We sought to determine what factors, including antibiotic choice, may be associated with ND among patients receiving FEP or P/T. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of inpatients at two hospitals in the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist system from Mar 2024 to Oct 2024. Patients ≥ 18 yrs old who received FEP or P/T on two or more consecutive calendar days were included. Only the first qualifying healthcare encounter during the study period was used for each patient. Patients with a preexisting diagnosis for ND, eg Alzheimer's disease, and those who received both FEP and P/T were excluded. ND was defined by incidence of new ICD10 code for seizure disorder, encephalopathy, delirium, agitation, altered mental status, coma, and/or confusion which was associated with the encounter when FEP or P/T was administered. Variables assessed as potential risk factors for ND included: patient characteristics (age, sex, race, BMI, comorbidities); presence of sepsis; hospital length of stay; admitting location (ICU vs non-ICU); hospital location; and antibiotic choice (FEP vs P/T). Results 2,642 patients were included in the analysis after excluding 1,461 patients for preexisting ND and 193 patients for receiving both antibiotics. 1,190 and 1,452 patients received FEP and P/T, respectively. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. 31 (1.2%) patients developed ND. Choice of FEP (1.68 vs 0.76%; OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.09-4.86, p=0.033) and longer length of stay (9 vs 6 days; OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.12-2.71, p=0.013) were the only factors associated with ND. Multivariable adjustments for possible confounders revealed no impact on the association between FEP and ND (Figure 1). Conclusion Use of FEP is associated with ND as determined by new diagnoses (ICD10 codes). However, the overall rate of ND is low, and the risk of this adverse effect may not justify routine consideration when selecting empiric antibiotic therapy. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2301
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2138. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Neurological Dysfunction in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Cefepime or Piperacillin/Tazobactam

Michael DeWitt, Katelyn Jimison, J. Williamson, Alaina Shukdinas et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
article

P-2138. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Neurological Dysfunction in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Cefepime or Piperacillin/Tazobactam

Michael DeWitt, Katelyn Jimison, J. Williamson, Alaina Shukdinas, Daniel Scozzari, Christopher Buckley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Beta-lactam antibiotics are associated with risk for neurotoxicity. Cefepime (FEP) may be more likely to cause neurological dysfunction (ND) due to its ability to cross the blood brain barrier and antagonize GABA receptors. In a secondary analysis, a recent randomized trial of FEP vs piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) found a relatively higher rate of ND among patients receiving FEP. We sought to determine what factors, including antibiotic choice, may be associated with ND among patients receiving FEP or P/T. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of inpatients at two hospitals in the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist system from Mar 2024 to Oct 2024. Patients ≥ 18 yrs old who received FEP or P/T on two or more consecutive calendar days were included. Only the first qualifying healthcare encounter during the study period was used for each patient. Patients with a preexisting diagnosis for ND, eg Alzheimer's disease, and those who received both FEP and P/T were excluded. ND was defined by incidence of new ICD10 code for seizure disorder, encephalopathy, delirium, agitation, altered mental status, coma, and/or confusion which was associated with the encounter when FEP or P/T was administered. Variables assessed as potential risk factors for ND included: patient characteristics (age, sex, race, BMI, comorbidities); presence of sepsis; hospital length of stay; admitting location (ICU vs non-ICU); hospital location; and antibiotic choice (FEP vs P/T). Results 2,642 patients were included in the analysis after excluding 1,461 patients for preexisting ND and 193 patients for receiving both antibiotics. 1,190 and 1,452 patients received FEP and P/T, respectively. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. 31 (1.2%) patients developed ND. Choice of FEP (1.68 vs 0.76%; OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.09-4.86, p=0.033) and longer length of stay (9 vs 6 days; OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.12-2.71, p=0.013) were the only factors associated with ND. Multivariable adjustments for possible confounders revealed no impact on the association between FEP and ND (Figure 1). Conclusion Use of FEP is associated with ND as determined by new diagnoses (ICD10 codes). However, the overall rate of ND is low, and the risk of this adverse effect may not justify routine consideration when selecting empiric antibiotic therapy. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
High Point University (US), Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US), Wake Forest University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.