P-1576. Examining the Association Between Diagnostic Uncertainty at Time of Admission and Poor Functional Outcomes at Discharge among Patients with Suspected Sepsis across 270 Hospitals

Abstract Background In the context of sepsis, vague presenting symptoms have been associated with worse prognosis. This study sought to evaluate whether diagnostic uncertainty at the time of admission, as represented by admission for symptoms rather than a specific disease diagnosis, was associated with death or decreased functional capacity at discharge. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult inpatients with suspected sepsis from 2019-2023 using the PINC-AI database. Suspected sepsis was defined by a single hospital day in which blood cultures were collected, serum lactate was measured, and IV antibiotics were administered. Symptomatic admitting diagnoses, such as fever or altered mental status, were identified using the “SYM” body system in the AHRQ Clinical Classification Software Refined. The primary outcome was a composite of death, hospice, or discharge to a nursing or healthcare facility. Only patients admitted emergently from home or clinic were included. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression with random effects for hospital was used to evaluate the association between predictors and the composite outcome. Results 703,359 patients with suspected sepsis across 270 hospitals were included. The average age was 65 (sd 17), 49% were women, and 28% had a symptomatic admitting diagnosis. Thirty-three percent experienced the composite outcome, including 6% of the cohort who died, 6% discharged to hospice, and 21% discharged to a nursing or healthcare facility. In multivariable analysis, symptomatic admitting diagnosis was associated with decreased likelihood of the composite outcome (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.85 – 0.88, p < 0.001). Admission to pulmonary / critical care (OR 2.46, 95% CI 2.39 -2.53), development of suspected sepsis after hospital day 1 (OR 2.32, 95% CI 2.27 – 2.37), and baseline dementia (OR 2.34, 95% CI 2.29 – 2.38) were most strongly associated with increased likelihood of the composite outcome. Conclusion Among patients with suspected sepsis, admission for symptoms rather than a specific disease diagnosis was associated with reduced likelihood of death or decreased functional capacity at discharge. This finding suggests that the potential negative impact of diagnostic uncertainty at time of admission is outweighed by disease-specific risk factors. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1756
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1576. Examining the Association Between Diagnostic Uncertainty at Time of Admission and Poor Functional Outcomes at Discharge among Patients with Suspected Sepsis across 270 Hospitals

Jonathan Baghdadi, J. Alejandro, Chih Chun Tung, Shruthi Ganesh
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

P-1576. Examining the Association Between Diagnostic Uncertainty at Time of Admission and Poor Functional Outcomes at Discharge among Patients with Suspected Sepsis across 270 Hospitals

Jonathan Baghdadi, J. Alejandro, Chih Chun Tung, Shruthi Ganesh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In the context of sepsis, vague presenting symptoms have been associated with worse prognosis. This study sought to evaluate whether diagnostic uncertainty at the time of admission, as represented by admission for symptoms rather than a specific disease diagnosis, was associated with death or decreased functional capacity at discharge. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult inpatients with suspected sepsis from 2019-2023 using the PINC-AI database. Suspected sepsis was defined by a single hospital day in which blood cultures were collected, serum lactate was measured, and IV antibiotics were administered. Symptomatic admitting diagnoses, such as fever or altered mental status, were identified using the “SYM” body system in the AHRQ Clinical Classification Software Refined. The primary outcome was a composite of death, hospice, or discharge to a nursing or healthcare facility. Only patients admitted emergently from home or clinic were included. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression with random effects for hospital was used to evaluate the association between predictors and the composite outcome. Results 703,359 patients with suspected sepsis across 270 hospitals were included. The average age was 65 (sd 17), 49% were women, and 28% had a symptomatic admitting diagnosis. Thirty-three percent experienced the composite outcome, including 6% of the cohort who died, 6% discharged to hospice, and 21% discharged to a nursing or healthcare facility. In multivariable analysis, symptomatic admitting diagnosis was associated with decreased likelihood of the composite outcome (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.85 – 0.88, p < 0.001). Admission to pulmonary / critical care (OR 2.46, 95% CI 2.39 -2.53), development of suspected sepsis after hospital day 1 (OR 2.32, 95% CI 2.27 – 2.37), and baseline dementia (OR 2.34, 95% CI 2.29 – 2.38) were most strongly associated with increased likelihood of the composite outcome. Conclusion Among patients with suspected sepsis, admission for symptoms rather than a specific disease diagnosis was associated with reduced likelihood of death or decreased functional capacity at discharge. This finding suggests that the potential negative impact of diagnostic uncertainty at time of admission is outweighed by disease-specific risk factors. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (US), University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.