P-1161. Identifying Resilient Performance in Outpatient Hemodialysis During COVID-19: A Longitudinal Cluster Analysis of BSI and IVAS Rates

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the importance of resilient, safe care delivery in healthcare systems during times of stress. Bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain a major cause of death among hemodialysis (HD) patients, making safe care essential, especially during disruption. This study used a novel approach to characterize resilient performance patterns in US outpatient HD facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Using a retrospective longitudinal design, we analyzed rates of two patient safety measures—BSI and intravenous antimicrobial starts (IVAS)—reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Inclusion criteria were outpatient HD facilities serving adults with complete BSI and IVAS reporting during both pre-COVID-19 (April 2018–April 2019) and COVID-19 (April 2021–April 2023) periods, plus complete annual survey and COVID-19 reporting. We applied K-means for longitudinal data (KmL), a machine-learning method, to classify facilities into clusters based on BSI and IVAS rates in each period. Resilient performance was assessed by concordance in cluster assignments between periods using percent agreement and McNemar’s test. Results Of 7052 facilities reporting to NHSN, 5098 (72%) met inclusion criteria. For each outcome, KmL assigned facilities into one of two clusters (A or B) per period (Table 1, Figure 1). On average, facilities in cluster A had lower pooled mean rates and cluster B had higher rates. For BSI, 9% of facilities in cluster A pre-COVID-19 transitioned to cluster B during COVID-19, while 19% shifted from cluster B to cluster A (Figure 2). For IVAS, 13% transitioned to cluster B and 12% to cluster A (Figure 3). McNemar’s test revealed asymmetry in transitions. Conclusion We identified different facility-level patterns in BSI and IVAS outcomes before and during COVID-19. These methods may help healthcare systems and public health identify resilient performance patterns during system stress. Identifying facilities where rates increased may help target additional support and resources. With a focus on facilities that shifted between clusters, future analyses will identify operational factors associated with the resilient delivery of safe care. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1354
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1161. Identifying Resilient Performance in Outpatient Hemodialysis During COVID-19: A Longitudinal Cluster Analysis of BSI and IVAS Rates

Jonathan R. Edwards, Matthew J. Stuckey, Qunna Li, Jeneita M. Bell et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

P-1161. Identifying Resilient Performance in Outpatient Hemodialysis During COVID-19: A Longitudinal Cluster Analysis of BSI and IVAS Rates

Jonathan R. Edwards, Matthew J. Stuckey, Qunna Li, Jeneita M. Bell, Shannon Novosad, Rahsaan Overton, Lacey Critchley, Lu Meng, Sarah Yi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the importance of resilient, safe care delivery in healthcare systems during times of stress. Bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain a major cause of death among hemodialysis (HD) patients, making safe care essential, especially during disruption. This study used a novel approach to characterize resilient performance patterns in US outpatient HD facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Using a retrospective longitudinal design, we analyzed rates of two patient safety measures—BSI and intravenous antimicrobial starts (IVAS)—reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Inclusion criteria were outpatient HD facilities serving adults with complete BSI and IVAS reporting during both pre-COVID-19 (April 2018–April 2019) and COVID-19 (April 2021–April 2023) periods, plus complete annual survey and COVID-19 reporting. We applied K-means for longitudinal data (KmL), a machine-learning method, to classify facilities into clusters based on BSI and IVAS rates in each period. Resilient performance was assessed by concordance in cluster assignments between periods using percent agreement and McNemar’s test. Results Of 7052 facilities reporting to NHSN, 5098 (72%) met inclusion criteria. For each outcome, KmL assigned facilities into one of two clusters (A or B) per period (Table 1, Figure 1). On average, facilities in cluster A had lower pooled mean rates and cluster B had higher rates. For BSI, 9% of facilities in cluster A pre-COVID-19 transitioned to cluster B during COVID-19, while 19% shifted from cluster B to cluster A (Figure 2). For IVAS, 13% transitioned to cluster B and 12% to cluster A (Figure 3). McNemar’s test revealed asymmetry in transitions. Conclusion We identified different facility-level patterns in BSI and IVAS outcomes before and during COVID-19. These methods may help healthcare systems and public health identify resilient performance patterns during system stress. Identifying facilities where rates increased may help target additional support and resources. With a focus on facilities that shifted between clusters, future analyses will identify operational factors associated with the resilient delivery of safe care. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Independent Sector (US), CDC Foundation (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.