P-1371. Real-World Performance of the "TB or Not TB" Tuberculosis Diagnostic Clinical Decision Support System

Abstract Background We implemented a validated clinical decision support system (CDSS) to guide clinicians through the diagnostic evaluation of individuals with suspected active tuberculosis across the Mass General Brigham System (MGB) in August 2024. TBorNotTB assigns points based on epidemiologic risk factors, tuberculosis history, symptoms, chest imaging, and sputum/bronchoscopy results. If the CDSS score is < 1, the evaluation is complete and airborne infection isolation (AII) precautions are discontinued; otherwise, additional evaluation is recommended, including review by infection control personnel. Our objective was to assess early real-world CDSS performance. Methods We conducted a prospective study of MGB patients for whom the TBorNotTB CDSS was used from August 2024-January 2025. We evaluated the frequency of CDSS use and the sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the CDSS to detect active tuberculosis (with AII continuation) in comparison to mycobacterial culture and PCR when available. Details of individuals with confirmed tuberculosis were also collected. Results Providers used the CDSS for 291 (41%) of the 715 individuals marked in the electronic health record as having suspected tuberculosis. Of these, 4/291 (1.4%) had confirmed tuberculosis and 248/291 (85%) tested negative for tuberculosis by PCR and/or mycobacterial culture (Figure 1). An additional 39/291 (13%) did not have mycobacterial culture or PCR performed. Among uses of the CDSS in which there was corresponding mycobacterial culture or PCR available (N=252), the sensitivity and specificity of the tool to detect tuberculosis were 100% and 60%, respectively. Median CDSS scores for individuals with and without TB were 8 (range: 2-19) and 0 (range: -12-18), respectively (Figure 2), yielding an AUC of 0.84. Individuals with confirmed tuberculosis are described in Table 1. Conclusion With real-world use, the TBorNotTB CDSS demonstrated 100% sensitivity and moderate specificity to predict tuberculosis among individuals with suspected tuberculosis in a low-prevalence setting. This CDSS could help reduce risks of nosocomial tuberculosis transmission and infection control person-time spent reviewing individuals with suspected tuberculosis. Disclosures Erica S. Shenoy, MD, PhD, Up to Date: Author

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1558
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1371. Real-World Performance of the "TB or Not TB" Tuberculosis Diagnostic Clinical Decision Support System

Erica S. Shenoy, Molly L Paras, Lindsay Germaine, Caitlin M. Dugdale et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

P-1371. Real-World Performance of the "TB or Not TB" Tuberculosis Diagnostic Clinical Decision Support System

Erica S. Shenoy, Molly L Paras, Lindsay Germaine, Caitlin M. Dugdale, Chloe V. Green, Jacob E. Lazarus, Katherine Swanson, Rocío Hurtado, Michelle S. Jerry, Stephen Maxfield, Emily P Hyle, Kimon C Zachary
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background We implemented a validated clinical decision support system (CDSS) to guide clinicians through the diagnostic evaluation of individuals with suspected active tuberculosis across the Mass General Brigham System (MGB) in August 2024. TBorNotTB assigns points based on epidemiologic risk factors, tuberculosis history, symptoms, chest imaging, and sputum/bronchoscopy results. If the CDSS score is < 1, the evaluation is complete and airborne infection isolation (AII) precautions are discontinued; otherwise, additional evaluation is recommended, including review by infection control personnel. Our objective was to assess early real-world CDSS performance. Methods We conducted a prospective study of MGB patients for whom the TBorNotTB CDSS was used from August 2024-January 2025. We evaluated the frequency of CDSS use and the sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the CDSS to detect active tuberculosis (with AII continuation) in comparison to mycobacterial culture and PCR when available. Details of individuals with confirmed tuberculosis were also collected. Results Providers used the CDSS for 291 (41%) of the 715 individuals marked in the electronic health record as having suspected tuberculosis. Of these, 4/291 (1.4%) had confirmed tuberculosis and 248/291 (85%) tested negative for tuberculosis by PCR and/or mycobacterial culture (Figure 1). An additional 39/291 (13%) did not have mycobacterial culture or PCR performed. Among uses of the CDSS in which there was corresponding mycobacterial culture or PCR available (N=252), the sensitivity and specificity of the tool to detect tuberculosis were 100% and 60%, respectively. Median CDSS scores for individuals with and without TB were 8 (range: 2-19) and 0 (range: -12-18), respectively (Figure 2), yielding an AUC of 0.84. Individuals with confirmed tuberculosis are described in Table 1. Conclusion With real-world use, the TBorNotTB CDSS demonstrated 100% sensitivity and moderate specificity to predict tuberculosis among individuals with suspected tuberculosis in a low-prevalence setting. This CDSS could help reduce risks of nosocomial tuberculosis transmission and infection control person-time spent reviewing individuals with suspected tuberculosis. Disclosures Erica S. Shenoy, MD, PhD, Up to Date: Author

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Political Research Associates (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Mass General Brigham (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.