298. Oral vs Intravenous Antibiotics in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Abstract Background Historically in the United States, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been managed with intravenous (IV) antibiotics. A number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated non-inferiority of oral (PO) antibiotics compared to IV therapy in the treatment of bone and joint infections. Our study is a non-inferiority trial comparing PO and IV antibiotic regimens in primary hip and knee PJIs. Methods This is an ongoing, multi-center, parallel-group, unblinded, non-inferiority RCT approved by our institution's Institutional Review Board with enrollment beginning December, 2020. Participants include adults with a primary hip or knee arthroplasty, diagnosed with PJI by International Consensus Meeting criteria, and treated with surgery. Exclusion criteria include prior revision, the need for IV antibiotics for other indications, or a lack of an antibiotic option in either arm. Patients were randomized to receive either PO or IV antibiotics for six weeks. PO rifampin and follow-on antibiotic suppression was allowed in both arms. The primary study end point is failure at one year by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Descriptive analysis is provided for the preliminary findings. Results Forty-five patients completed one-year follow up with 27 and 18 in the PO and IV groups, respectively. They had a median age of 65 years, 57% were male, 8.8% were of non-white race. Twenty patients (44.4%) were treated for primary hip PJI, and 25 (55%) for primary knee PJI. Twenty-five (55%) underwent a two-stage exchange arthroplasty, 13 (26%) had debridement with implant retention, and 8 (17%) had single-stage exchange arthroplasty. The most commonly treated infections were Staphylococcus spp. (n= 21) and culture negative infection (n=12). There were five treatment failures: two (15.4%) in the IV group and three (12.5%) in the oral group. Of IV patients, 44% (n=8) had a catheter complication. Conclusion Preliminary findings in 45 patients who completed one year of follow up suggest that PO antibiotic regimens may be a viable and safe alternative to IV therapy in the treatment of primary hip and knee PJI. Study enrollment is ongoing across multiple centers with a larger patient cohort expected to provide a more definitive assessment of this important clinical question. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.100
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

298. Oral vs Intravenous Antibiotics in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Eric B. Smith, Neeku Salehi, Javad Parvizi, Brooke R Olin et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
article

298. Oral vs Intravenous Antibiotics in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Eric B. Smith, Neeku Salehi, Javad Parvizi, Brooke R Olin, Angelina Liddy, Elizabeth Gancher, Daniel Taupin, Katherine Belden, Megan Gorleski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Historically in the United States, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been managed with intravenous (IV) antibiotics. A number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated non-inferiority of oral (PO) antibiotics compared to IV therapy in the treatment of bone and joint infections. Our study is a non-inferiority trial comparing PO and IV antibiotic regimens in primary hip and knee PJIs. Methods This is an ongoing, multi-center, parallel-group, unblinded, non-inferiority RCT approved by our institution's Institutional Review Board with enrollment beginning December, 2020. Participants include adults with a primary hip or knee arthroplasty, diagnosed with PJI by International Consensus Meeting criteria, and treated with surgery. Exclusion criteria include prior revision, the need for IV antibiotics for other indications, or a lack of an antibiotic option in either arm. Patients were randomized to receive either PO or IV antibiotics for six weeks. PO rifampin and follow-on antibiotic suppression was allowed in both arms. The primary study end point is failure at one year by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Descriptive analysis is provided for the preliminary findings. Results Forty-five patients completed one-year follow up with 27 and 18 in the PO and IV groups, respectively. They had a median age of 65 years, 57% were male, 8.8% were of non-white race. Twenty patients (44.4%) were treated for primary hip PJI, and 25 (55%) for primary knee PJI. Twenty-five (55%) underwent a two-stage exchange arthroplasty, 13 (26%) had debridement with implant retention, and 8 (17%) had single-stage exchange arthroplasty. The most commonly treated infections were Staphylococcus spp. (n= 21) and culture negative infection (n=12). There were five treatment failures: two (15.4%) in the IV group and three (12.5%) in the oral group. Of IV patients, 44% (n=8) had a catheter complication. Conclusion Preliminary findings in 45 patients who completed one year of follow up suggest that PO antibiotic regimens may be a viable and safe alternative to IV therapy in the treatment of primary hip and knee PJI. Study enrollment is ongoing across multiple centers with a larger patient cohort expected to provide a more definitive assessment of this important clinical question. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US), Rothman Orthopaedics (US), Rothman Institute (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.