P-312. Improving Utilization of PrEP Across Internal Medicine Resident Clinics

Abstract Background The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends HIV screening for all adults and annual testing for those at higher risk, including men who have sex with men, individuals with STIs, injection drug users, and those engaging in transactional sex. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), endorsed by the CDC, is a highly effective prevention method. Expanding PrEP education is crucial to reducing HIV transmission, improving health literacy, and addressing access disparities, especially among minorities and women. We aimed to increase HIV risk factor screening and appropriate PrEP prescription in the Internal Medicine resident clinic by 15% over a 3-month period.Image 1Educational posters in the clinic summarizing screening guidelinesFigure 1The pre- and post-intervention survey results (1) Methods We reviewed 60 patient charts in the clinic to identify PrEP eligibility and current PrEP use. A pre-intervention survey assessed residents’ baseline knowledge, comfort with sexual history-taking, and experience prescribing PrEP. Based on survey results and feedback from residents, social workers, and infectious disease specialists, we developed targeted interventions: educational posters in the clinic summarizing screening guidelines, PrEP options, labs, and follow-up needs; and a self-directed PowerPoint module with a post-module questionnaire to assess knowledge gains.Figure 2The pre- and post-intervention survey results (2)Figure 3The pre- and post-intervention survey results (3) Results At baseline, 33.3% of eligible patients were offered PrEP. The pre-intervention survey noted that 37% felt comfortable taking a sexual history, 80% had never prescribed PrEP, and 69% lacked confidence in discussing or prescribing it. After the intervention, the rate of PrEP offers to eligible patients remained at 33.3%. However, resident-reported comfort with sexual history-taking rose to 50%, and 28.6% reported prescribing PrEP. Confidence in discussing or prescribing PrEP improved, with only 28.6% of residents still reporting discomfort. Half of the residents also found the posters helpful in guiding conversations around sexual health and PrEP. Conclusion There was not a significant increase in the rates of HIV PrEP prescription in the resident clinic over the course of a 3-month period. However, this project helped residents become comfortable discussing sexual health and PrEP in the clinic setting. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.531
Primary Topic
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-312. Improving Utilization of PrEP Across Internal Medicine Resident Clinics

M. Wilkerson, Kumaraman Srivastava, Kaihei Masuda, Aadil Ali et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
article

P-312. Improving Utilization of PrEP Across Internal Medicine Resident Clinics

M. Wilkerson, Kumaraman Srivastava, Kaihei Masuda, Aadil Ali, Bisma Khwaja, RAAKHI MENON, Anirudha Chatterjee, Sanjana Janumpally, Christine Pho, Nadia Ahmed, Joanie O’Leary, Alexander Bosley, Michael Phan, Migara Jayasekera
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends HIV screening for all adults and annual testing for those at higher risk, including men who have sex with men, individuals with STIs, injection drug users, and those engaging in transactional sex. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), endorsed by the CDC, is a highly effective prevention method. Expanding PrEP education is crucial to reducing HIV transmission, improving health literacy, and addressing access disparities, especially among minorities and women. We aimed to increase HIV risk factor screening and appropriate PrEP prescription in the Internal Medicine resident clinic by 15% over a 3-month period.Image 1Educational posters in the clinic summarizing screening guidelinesFigure 1The pre- and post-intervention survey results (1) Methods We reviewed 60 patient charts in the clinic to identify PrEP eligibility and current PrEP use. A pre-intervention survey assessed residents’ baseline knowledge, comfort with sexual history-taking, and experience prescribing PrEP. Based on survey results and feedback from residents, social workers, and infectious disease specialists, we developed targeted interventions: educational posters in the clinic summarizing screening guidelines, PrEP options, labs, and follow-up needs; and a self-directed PowerPoint module with a post-module questionnaire to assess knowledge gains.Figure 2The pre- and post-intervention survey results (2)Figure 3The pre- and post-intervention survey results (3) Results At baseline, 33.3% of eligible patients were offered PrEP. The pre-intervention survey noted that 37% felt comfortable taking a sexual history, 80% had never prescribed PrEP, and 69% lacked confidence in discussing or prescribing it. After the intervention, the rate of PrEP offers to eligible patients remained at 33.3%. However, resident-reported comfort with sexual history-taking rose to 50%, and 28.6% reported prescribing PrEP. Confidence in discussing or prescribing PrEP improved, with only 28.6% of residents still reporting discomfort. Half of the residents also found the posters helpful in guiding conversations around sexual health and PrEP. Conclusion There was not a significant increase in the rates of HIV PrEP prescription in the resident clinic over the course of a 3-month period. However, this project helped residents become comfortable discussing sexual health and PrEP in the clinic setting. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.