P-1349. Relative Impact of Antibiotic-Resistant vs Susceptible Infections in US Hospitals, 2018-2022: Comparing Mortality Rates and Absolute Death Counts

Abstract Background Clinical guidance, research, and burden estimates prioritize antibacterial resistant organisms. However, understanding the relative burden of deaths due to resistant vs susceptible organisms might tailor clinical and public health priorities. We therefore contrasted mortality rates against absolute death counts associated with resistant vs susceptible infections in U.S. hospitals.Figure 1:Cohort Selection Flowsheet.The PINC-AI database was queried to identify adult inpatients receiving 3 or more days of antibiotics in conjunction with the isolation of a bacterial pathogen from culture. WHO and ECDC resistance definitions were applied to determine the prevalence and mortality rates of resistant and susceptible pathogens of interest.* Exceptions were made for inclusions of death after 2 days of antibiotic therapyFigure 2:Resistant versus susceptible organism-specific risk-adjusted mortality count and risk-adjusted mortality rate for WHO Priority Pathogen and ECDC MDR pathogen defining lenses.For WHO lens, “susceptible” refers to tracer antibiotic (e.g., fluoroquinolone susceptible Shigella spp.) . For ECDC lens, “susceptible” refers to all the antibiotic categories in the ECDC MDR defining rubric [Magiorakos, Clin Micro Infect 2012]. Mortality models were adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidity burden, admit year, admit source, POA Do not resuscitate status, infection onset, polymicrobial status, and individual POA acute organ failure score elements [Courtright. Crit Care Med 2017]. Note: S. pneumonia counts do not include antigen-based identification. diagnostics not included. POA= present-on-admission Methods In this retrospective cohort study, adult inpatients with bacterial infection (culture growth and receiving antibiotics for > 3 days) were identified in the PINC-AI database. Resistance was defined by 2024 WHO Priority Pathogen and ECDC multidrug resistance (MDR) lenses. Predictive margins were used to obtain risk-adjusted mortality rates while controlling for confounders. To compare infection- vs resistance-related mortality, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for mortality in matched patients hospitalized for similar conditions with (vs without) hospital-onset infection were compared.Figure 3:Subgroup Analysis of Resistant versus susceptible organism specific risk-adjusted mortality counts and risk-adjusted mortality rates for WHO Priority Pathogen defining lens. For WHO priority pathogen lens, “susceptible” refers to susceptible to the tracer antibiotic. Sepsis, septic shock and COVID-19 defined using explicit ICD-10 coding. E-SOFA= Electronic Sequential Acute Organ Failure Score. BSI=bloodstream infectionTable 1:Demographic table stratified by resistance definition and status. Results At 285 hospitals between 2018-2022, 739,404 inpatients had 911,966 bacterial infections (Fig.1) of whom 10.7% died. Patients with infections due to resistant (vs susceptible) pathogens had more critical illness and inadequate empiric therapy (Table). Risk-adjusted mortality was marginally higher for resistant (vs susceptible) infections (11.1 vs 10.1% for WHO priority pathogens and 10.0% vs 9.6% vs 9.7% vs 9.4% for resistance to 3+(MDR), 2, 1 and 0 antibiotic categories, respectively; Fig.2). Modeled absolute deaths across all pathogens (except E. faecium) and subgroups were higher for susceptible infections (Figures 2 and 3). Among patients hospitalized for other reasons, hospital-onset infection itself was associated with greater excess odds of mortality than resistance (aOR resistant vs no infection= 1.55(95% CI. 1.48-1.63); aOR susceptible vs no infection=1.41(95% CI. 1.37-1.45). Conclusion In US hospitals, risk-adjusted mortality rates are slightly higher for patients with resistant vs susceptible infections, but susceptible infections are more common and thus account for 2-3-fold more deaths compared to resistant organisms. Both antibiotic susceptible and resistant bacterial infections should be prioritized for prevention, management and research. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1537
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1349. Relative Impact of Antibiotic-Resistant vs Susceptible Infections in US Hospitals, 2018-2022: Comparing Mortality Rates and Absolute Death Counts

Sarah E. Warner, S. C. Liu, Claire Shappell, Morgan Walker et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

P-1349. Relative Impact of Antibiotic-Resistant vs Susceptible Infections in US Hospitals, 2018-2022: Comparing Mortality Rates and Absolute Death Counts

Sarah E. Warner, S. C. Liu, Claire Shappell, Morgan Walker, Christina Yek, Guoqing Diao, Chanu Rhee, Sameer S Kadri, Alexander Lawandi, John H Powers, Maniraj Neupane, Michael Klompas, John P Dekker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Clinical guidance, research, and burden estimates prioritize antibacterial resistant organisms. However, understanding the relative burden of deaths due to resistant vs susceptible organisms might tailor clinical and public health priorities. We therefore contrasted mortality rates against absolute death counts associated with resistant vs susceptible infections in U.S. hospitals.Figure 1:Cohort Selection Flowsheet.The PINC-AI database was queried to identify adult inpatients receiving 3 or more days of antibiotics in conjunction with the isolation of a bacterial pathogen from culture. WHO and ECDC resistance definitions were applied to determine the prevalence and mortality rates of resistant and susceptible pathogens of interest.* Exceptions were made for inclusions of death after 2 days of antibiotic therapyFigure 2:Resistant versus susceptible organism-specific risk-adjusted mortality count and risk-adjusted mortality rate for WHO Priority Pathogen and ECDC MDR pathogen defining lenses.For WHO lens, “susceptible” refers to tracer antibiotic (e.g., fluoroquinolone susceptible Shigella spp.) . For ECDC lens, “susceptible” refers to all the antibiotic categories in the ECDC MDR defining rubric [Magiorakos, Clin Micro Infect 2012]. Mortality models were adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidity burden, admit year, admit source, POA Do not resuscitate status, infection onset, polymicrobial status, and individual POA acute organ failure score elements [Courtright. Crit Care Med 2017]. Note: S. pneumonia counts do not include antigen-based identification. diagnostics not included. POA= present-on-admission Methods In this retrospective cohort study, adult inpatients with bacterial infection (culture growth and receiving antibiotics for > 3 days) were identified in the PINC-AI database. Resistance was defined by 2024 WHO Priority Pathogen and ECDC multidrug resistance (MDR) lenses. Predictive margins were used to obtain risk-adjusted mortality rates while controlling for confounders. To compare infection- vs resistance-related mortality, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for mortality in matched patients hospitalized for similar conditions with (vs without) hospital-onset infection were compared.Figure 3:Subgroup Analysis of Resistant versus susceptible organism specific risk-adjusted mortality counts and risk-adjusted mortality rates for WHO Priority Pathogen defining lens. For WHO priority pathogen lens, “susceptible” refers to susceptible to the tracer antibiotic. Sepsis, septic shock and COVID-19 defined using explicit ICD-10 coding. E-SOFA= Electronic Sequential Acute Organ Failure Score. BSI=bloodstream infectionTable 1:Demographic table stratified by resistance definition and status. Results At 285 hospitals between 2018-2022, 739,404 inpatients had 911,966 bacterial infections (Fig.1) of whom 10.7% died. Patients with infections due to resistant (vs susceptible) pathogens had more critical illness and inadequate empiric therapy (Table). Risk-adjusted mortality was marginally higher for resistant (vs susceptible) infections (11.1 vs 10.1% for WHO priority pathogens and 10.0% vs 9.6% vs 9.7% vs 9.4% for resistance to 3+(MDR), 2, 1 and 0 antibiotic categories, respectively; Fig.2). Modeled absolute deaths across all pathogens (except E. faecium) and subgroups were higher for susceptible infections (Figures 2 and 3). Among patients hospitalized for other reasons, hospital-onset infection itself was associated with greater excess odds of mortality than resistance (aOR resistant vs no infection= 1.55(95% CI. 1.48-1.63); aOR susceptible vs no infection=1.41(95% CI. 1.37-1.45). Conclusion In US hospitals, risk-adjusted mortality rates are slightly higher for patients with resistant vs susceptible infections, but susceptible infections are more common and thus account for 2-3-fold more deaths compared to resistant organisms. Both antibiotic susceptible and resistant bacterial infections should be prioritized for prevention, management and research. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Harvard University (US), George Washington University (US), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.