P-508. Factors Influencing Feasibility of Studying Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes After Antenatal Lyme Disease

Abstract Background Effects of antenatal Lyme disease (LD) exposure on the pregnant patient, placenta, and fetus and subsequent child outcomes are not well known. To date, there have been no obstetrical pathology and long-term neurodevelopmental follow-up studies of infants exposed to LD during pregnancy. A first-of-its-kind pilot study (NCT06026969) is being conducted at Children’s National Hospital in Washington, DC. Methods This study aims to assess the feasibility of recruiting pregnant patients with LD and following their pregnancy outcomes and children’s neurodevelopment through age 18 months. Pregnant adults in the U.S. or Canada can participate if they have met CDC criteria for acute LD during their current pregnancy or post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) within 5 years. Results As of May 2025, 9 participants (4 with acute LD, 5 with PTLDS) have enrolled in the study. Successful recruitment methods have included posting in LD-focused social media groups and partnering with trusted stakeholders (doctors, nonprofit organizations) to share details about the study. All enrolled participants have learned about the study online. Fifty additional people have completed an interest screener; reasons for non-enrollment include not meeting CDC criteria for LD/PTLDS (n=15) or diagnosis outside of the eligibility window (n=7), not being pregnant at the time of eligibility assessment (n=5), them declining participation (n=6), or eligibility assessment in progress (n=17). Eight participants have given birth to date; 100% have completed neurodevelopmental follow-up and a qualitative interview about their experience with LD/PTLDS during pregnancy. Four have completed prenatal and/or postnatal imaging. Placentas have been successfully processed by all birth hospitals in preparation for further analysis. Conclusion While recruitment/enrollment are complex, there is robust interest from the pregnant LD/PTLDS patient population in contributing to research. Reducing financial barriers (e.g., travel costs), early communication with birth hospitals about placenta collection, partnering with trusted stakeholders, and using targeted marketing strategies have contributed to success in enrolling participants at this infrequent intersection of LD and pregnancy. Disclosures Roberta L. DeBiasi, MD, MS, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Sarah B. Mulkey, MD, PhD, Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.723
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-508. Factors Influencing Feasibility of Studying Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes After Antenatal Lyme Disease

Meagan E. Williams, David A. Schwartz, Roberta L DeBiasi, Sarah B Mulkey
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
article

P-508. Factors Influencing Feasibility of Studying Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes After Antenatal Lyme Disease

Meagan E. Williams, David A. Schwartz, Roberta L DeBiasi, Sarah B Mulkey
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Effects of antenatal Lyme disease (LD) exposure on the pregnant patient, placenta, and fetus and subsequent child outcomes are not well known. To date, there have been no obstetrical pathology and long-term neurodevelopmental follow-up studies of infants exposed to LD during pregnancy. A first-of-its-kind pilot study (NCT06026969) is being conducted at Children’s National Hospital in Washington, DC. Methods This study aims to assess the feasibility of recruiting pregnant patients with LD and following their pregnancy outcomes and children’s neurodevelopment through age 18 months. Pregnant adults in the U.S. or Canada can participate if they have met CDC criteria for acute LD during their current pregnancy or post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) within 5 years. Results As of May 2025, 9 participants (4 with acute LD, 5 with PTLDS) have enrolled in the study. Successful recruitment methods have included posting in LD-focused social media groups and partnering with trusted stakeholders (doctors, nonprofit organizations) to share details about the study. All enrolled participants have learned about the study online. Fifty additional people have completed an interest screener; reasons for non-enrollment include not meeting CDC criteria for LD/PTLDS (n=15) or diagnosis outside of the eligibility window (n=7), not being pregnant at the time of eligibility assessment (n=5), them declining participation (n=6), or eligibility assessment in progress (n=17). Eight participants have given birth to date; 100% have completed neurodevelopmental follow-up and a qualitative interview about their experience with LD/PTLDS during pregnancy. Four have completed prenatal and/or postnatal imaging. Placentas have been successfully processed by all birth hospitals in preparation for further analysis. Conclusion While recruitment/enrollment are complex, there is robust interest from the pregnant LD/PTLDS patient population in contributing to research. Reducing financial barriers (e.g., travel costs), early communication with birth hospitals about placenta collection, partnering with trusted stakeholders, and using targeted marketing strategies have contributed to success in enrolling participants at this infrequent intersection of LD and pregnancy. Disclosures Roberta L. DeBiasi, MD, MS, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Sarah B. Mulkey, MD, PhD, Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
George Washington University Hospital (US), Children's National (US), George Washington University (US), Perinatal Institute (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.