P-178. Cost Savings of Carba-R Gene Xpert® Testing for Targeted Treatment Compared to Empiric Ceftazidime-Avibactam/Aztreonam Combination for Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Resource-Limited Setting with a High Prevalence of blaNDM

Abstract Background The Philippines has seen a significant increase in carbapenem resistance (CR) in Klebsiella pneumoniae in recent years, with a current nationwide CR rate of nearly 17%. A recent study by our group revealed that 92% of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp) isolates harbor at least one carbapenemase gene, with the following distribution: blaNDM (68.8%), blaOXA-48-like (38.5%), and blaKPC (28.6%). Standard treatment of CR-Kp with blaNDM is with combination ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam, which is prohibitively expensive in our setting. Most Filipinos have no private insurance and public health insurance pays a small percentage of actual health costs, with the rest being out of pocket. Treatment of blaKPC and blaOXA-48-like can be done with ceftazidime/avibactam monotherapy. We determined whether the significant cost of molecular testing can be offset by targeted monotherapy as opposed to empiric combination therapy for all CR-Kp infections. Methods We set antibiotic costs based on retail prices of each antibiotic in our pharmacy and set molecular testing costs based on commercial rates. We compared an empiric treatment scenario with targeted testing based on the previous carbapenemase gene distributions. We calculated cost savings for every 100 CR-Kp patients who underwent molecular testing compared to empiric therapy using a standard 7-day course of antibiotics. Results Scenario Number of patients to be treated (n = 100) Cost of 7-day course (in USD*)# Cost of Carba-R test (in USD) Cost (in USD) Scenario 1: Empiric CZA/ATM for all patients 100CZA/ATM 396,312.47 No testing 396,312.47 Scenario 2: Directed therapy 63 NDMCZA/ATM 249,676.85 9,027.40 258,704.26 37 non-NDMCZA only 120,749.53 5,301.81 126,051.34 Total cost of directed therapy 384,755.60 Cost savings with directed therapy per 100 patients tested 11,556.87 *1 USD = 55.83 PhP as of April 30, 2025 #CZA cost/individual = 3,263.50 USD, ATM cost/individual = 699.62 USD &Carba-R cost/individual = 143.29 USD Conclusion The cost of testing with Carba-R Gene Xpert® among CR-Kp -infected Filipino inpatients is more than offset by the added costs of empiric treatment, in addition to indirect benefits of improved antimicrobial stewardship and decreased downstream rates of resistance. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.402
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-178. Cost Savings of Carba-R Gene Xpert® Testing for Targeted Treatment Compared to Empiric Ceftazidime-Avibactam/Aztreonam Combination for Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Resource-Limited Setting with a High Prevalence of blaNDM

Jonnel B. Poblete
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

P-178. Cost Savings of Carba-R Gene Xpert® Testing for Targeted Treatment Compared to Empiric Ceftazidime-Avibactam/Aztreonam Combination for Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Resource-Limited Setting with a High Prevalence of blaNDM

Jonnel B. Poblete
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Philippines has seen a significant increase in carbapenem resistance (CR) in Klebsiella pneumoniae in recent years, with a current nationwide CR rate of nearly 17%. A recent study by our group revealed that 92% of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp) isolates harbor at least one carbapenemase gene, with the following distribution: blaNDM (68.8%), blaOXA-48-like (38.5%), and blaKPC (28.6%). Standard treatment of CR-Kp with blaNDM is with combination ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam, which is prohibitively expensive in our setting. Most Filipinos have no private insurance and public health insurance pays a small percentage of actual health costs, with the rest being out of pocket. Treatment of blaKPC and blaOXA-48-like can be done with ceftazidime/avibactam monotherapy. We determined whether the significant cost of molecular testing can be offset by targeted monotherapy as opposed to empiric combination therapy for all CR-Kp infections. Methods We set antibiotic costs based on retail prices of each antibiotic in our pharmacy and set molecular testing costs based on commercial rates. We compared an empiric treatment scenario with targeted testing based on the previous carbapenemase gene distributions. We calculated cost savings for every 100 CR-Kp patients who underwent molecular testing compared to empiric therapy using a standard 7-day course of antibiotics. Results Scenario Number of patients to be treated (n = 100) Cost of 7-day course (in USD*)# Cost of Carba-R test (in USD) Cost (in USD) Scenario 1: Empiric CZA/ATM for all patients 100CZA/ATM 396,312.47 No testing 396,312.47 Scenario 2: Directed therapy 63 NDMCZA/ATM 249,676.85 9,027.40 258,704.26 37 non-NDMCZA only 120,749.53 5,301.81 126,051.34 Total cost of directed therapy 384,755.60 Cost savings with directed therapy per 100 patients tested 11,556.87 *1 USD = 55.83 PhP as of April 30, 2025 #CZA cost/individual = 3,263.50 USD, ATM cost/individual = 699.62 USD &Carba-R cost/individual = 143.29 USD Conclusion The cost of testing with Carba-R Gene Xpert® among CR-Kp -infected Filipino inpatients is more than offset by the added costs of empiric treatment, in addition to indirect benefits of improved antimicrobial stewardship and decreased downstream rates of resistance. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Philippine General Hospital (PH), University of the Philippines Manila (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.