P-1224. Activity of Cefiderocol-Based Combinations Against Cefiderocol-Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates

Abstract Background Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a multidrug-resistant pathogen with limited therapeutic options. IDSA guidelines recommend cefiderocol (FDC) in combination with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), levofloxacin (LEV), or minocycline (MIN) for empiric treatment of serious infections. However, there is a lack of data evaluating these combinations in the setting of FDC resistance. We aimed to assess the in vitro activity of FDC alone and in combination with TMP/SMX, LEV, or MIN against FDC-resistant clinical isolates of S. maltophilia. Methods Six FDC-resistant S. maltophilia clinical isolates from three U.S. institutions were tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of FDC, TMP/SMX, LEV, and MIN were determined via broth microdilution per CLSI guidelines. Time-kill assays were performed at clinically relevant Cmax concentrations for each drug alone and in combination with FDC. Bactericidal activity was defined as a ≥3-log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction at 24 hours. Whole-genome sequencing was conducted to identify resistance mechanisms. Results Among six FDC-resistant S. maltophilia isolates, FDC in combination with LEV or TMP/SMX demonstrated superior activity compared to all other regimens in 3/6 isolates, including significantly enhanced killing against isolate UK3 (Figure 1). Notably, FDC monotherapy outperformed all other regimens in 2/6 isolates, despite elevated MICs, indicating retained in vitro activity in select strains. In the remaining isolates, no significant differences in CFU/mL change were observed among monotherapy or combination regimens. Conclusion Among FDC-resistant S. maltophilia isolates, FDC combined with LEV or TMP/SMX showed superior activity in 3/6 isolates, including significant efficacy against UK3. FDC monotherapy also retained activity in select isolates despite resistant MICs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1416
Primary Topic
Infections and bacterial resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1224. Activity of Cefiderocol-Based Combinations Against Cefiderocol-Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates

Alex Do, Ashlan J. Kunz Coyne, Rachel Gray
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Infections and bacterial resistance
article

P-1224. Activity of Cefiderocol-Based Combinations Against Cefiderocol-Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates

Alex Do, Ashlan J. Kunz Coyne, Rachel Gray
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a multidrug-resistant pathogen with limited therapeutic options. IDSA guidelines recommend cefiderocol (FDC) in combination with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), levofloxacin (LEV), or minocycline (MIN) for empiric treatment of serious infections. However, there is a lack of data evaluating these combinations in the setting of FDC resistance. We aimed to assess the in vitro activity of FDC alone and in combination with TMP/SMX, LEV, or MIN against FDC-resistant clinical isolates of S. maltophilia. Methods Six FDC-resistant S. maltophilia clinical isolates from three U.S. institutions were tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of FDC, TMP/SMX, LEV, and MIN were determined via broth microdilution per CLSI guidelines. Time-kill assays were performed at clinically relevant Cmax concentrations for each drug alone and in combination with FDC. Bactericidal activity was defined as a ≥3-log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction at 24 hours. Whole-genome sequencing was conducted to identify resistance mechanisms. Results Among six FDC-resistant S. maltophilia isolates, FDC in combination with LEV or TMP/SMX demonstrated superior activity compared to all other regimens in 3/6 isolates, including significantly enhanced killing against isolate UK3 (Figure 1). Notably, FDC monotherapy outperformed all other regimens in 2/6 isolates, despite elevated MICs, indicating retained in vitro activity in select strains. In the remaining isolates, no significant differences in CFU/mL change were observed among monotherapy or combination regimens. Conclusion Among FDC-resistant S. maltophilia isolates, FDC combined with LEV or TMP/SMX showed superior activity in 3/6 isolates, including significant efficacy against UK3. FDC monotherapy also retained activity in select isolates despite resistant MICs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
University of Kentucky (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Infections and bacterial resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.