“Nursing the Metropolis” Revisited: Eighteenth-Century London and the Nurses of Guy’s Hospital, 1725–1820

Abstract This article looks closely at the women who worked as ward staff at Guy’s Hospital between the hospital’s founding and the year of Florence Nightingale’s birth. It continues the task of reassessing the lives and contributions of women who nursed in the years before the onset of the nursing-reform movement. This article does not rest on extensive data: It cannot say with any confidence, for example, the proportion of women who worked as nurses that were spinsters rather than wives or widows. What it can do is to set out some indicative examples that belie our existing assumptions. The results assist on dismantling the stereotype of the prereform nurse and replace it with an appreciation of these women as health care participants. This article argues that the women were very rarely incompetent or drunkards and in contrast were frequently equal to the tasks set for them by hospital governors, with or without being literate. They were also people with family connections to the wider metropolitan population and even to people with whom they forged friendships during their employment. In other words, they were rounded individuals whose working lives were governed by their position as relatively impoverished female Londoners rather than by their lack of ability or motivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing History Review
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/nursinghistory.34.0142
Primary Topic
Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Nursing the Metropolis” Revisited: Eighteenth-Century London and the Nurses of Guy’s Hospital, 1725–1820

Alannah Tomkins
Nursing History Review
Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
article

“Nursing the Metropolis” Revisited: Eighteenth-Century London and the Nurses of Guy’s Hospital, 1725–1820

Alannah Tomkins
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article looks closely at the women who worked as ward staff at Guy’s Hospital between the hospital’s founding and the year of Florence Nightingale’s birth. It continues the task of reassessing the lives and contributions of women who nursed in the years before the onset of the nursing-reform movement. This article does not rest on extensive data: It cannot say with any confidence, for example, the proportion of women who worked as nurses that were spinsters rather than wives or widows. What it can do is to set out some indicative examples that belie our existing assumptions. The results assist on dismantling the stereotype of the prereform nurse and replace it with an appreciation of these women as health care participants. This article argues that the women were very rarely incompetent or drunkards and in contrast were frequently equal to the tasks set for them by hospital governors, with or without being literate. They were also people with family connections to the wider metropolitan population and even to people with whom they forged friendships during their employment. In other words, they were rounded individuals whose working lives were governed by their position as relatively impoverished female Londoners rather than by their lack of ability or motivation.

Nursing History ReviewVol. 34
Keele University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.