P-15. Impact of Infectious Disease Consultation in Outcome of Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections

Abstract Background Enterococcus spp is the leading cause of Blood Stream Infections (BSI), particularly in healthcare settings associated with high (20%) mortality (1). Risk factors, co-morbidities, endocarditis, presence of complicated bacteraemia, antibiotic resistance, and inappropriate antibiotic choice of therapy further complicate the E BSI. Timely Infectious Diseases (ID) consultation may improve outcomes through optimized antimicrobial use, source identification, and infection control. (2)(3). This study evaluated the impact of ID consultation on outcomes in patients with EBSI.Table 1:Primary Outcomes of Enterococcal BSI Before (pre-phase) and After (post-phase) implementation of Infectious diseases consultationTable 2:Comparison of secondary clinical outcomes between post-phase and pre-phase study groups in Enterococcal BSI Methods A single-center, pre-post interventional study was conducted among hospitalized patients with first episodes of EBSI. In the pre-intervention phase (Jan 2022–June 2023), patients were retrospectively included. In the post-intervention phase (July 2023–Dec 2024) patients were prospectively enrolled and received ID consultation within 24 hours of blood culture positivity. Primary outcomes were bacteremia clearance within 72 hours and all-cause 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included source control, endocarditis diagnosis, antibiotic duration, and hospital stay. Study work flow Results A total of 73 patients with EBSI were included with 36 in the pre-phase phase and 37 in the post-phase.Follow-up blood cultures were obtained in 100% of post-phase patients versus 32.4% pre-phase (p < 0.0001), with higher bacteremia clearance (94.4% vs 22%, p < 0.0001) and lower all-cause mortality (36% vs 70.2%, p = 0.0036) and attributable mortality (2.7% vs 27%, p = 0.0039) as shown in table 1. Removable source identification (89% vs 59.4%, p = 0.004) and source control (83.3% vs 38%, p = 0.0001) were significantly better post-phase. Interventions such as abscess drainage (30.5% vs 13.5%, p = 0.08) were more common in post-phase group. Hospital stay was slightly longer in the post-phase (19 vs 17 days, p < 0.05) likely reflecting thorough evaluation and management. Median duration of total antibiotic therapy duration was extended in post phase consistent effective management (14 vs 10 days, p < 0.00000003) as shown in table 2. Conclusion Early ID consultation significantly improved bacteremia clearance, reduced mortality, and enhanced source identification and control in EBSI Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.246
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-15. Impact of Infectious Disease Consultation in Outcome of Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections

D. KUMAR, G. Bohra, Sadik Mohammed, Durga Shankar Meena et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

P-15. Impact of Infectious Disease Consultation in Outcome of Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections

D. KUMAR, G. Bohra, Sadik Mohammed, Durga Shankar Meena, Tejasvi kanagiri, Naresh Kumar Midha, Vibhor Tak, Navneet Kaur
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Enterococcus spp is the leading cause of Blood Stream Infections (BSI), particularly in healthcare settings associated with high (20%) mortality (1). Risk factors, co-morbidities, endocarditis, presence of complicated bacteraemia, antibiotic resistance, and inappropriate antibiotic choice of therapy further complicate the E BSI. Timely Infectious Diseases (ID) consultation may improve outcomes through optimized antimicrobial use, source identification, and infection control. (2)(3). This study evaluated the impact of ID consultation on outcomes in patients with EBSI.Table 1:Primary Outcomes of Enterococcal BSI Before (pre-phase) and After (post-phase) implementation of Infectious diseases consultationTable 2:Comparison of secondary clinical outcomes between post-phase and pre-phase study groups in Enterococcal BSI Methods A single-center, pre-post interventional study was conducted among hospitalized patients with first episodes of EBSI. In the pre-intervention phase (Jan 2022–June 2023), patients were retrospectively included. In the post-intervention phase (July 2023–Dec 2024) patients were prospectively enrolled and received ID consultation within 24 hours of blood culture positivity. Primary outcomes were bacteremia clearance within 72 hours and all-cause 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included source control, endocarditis diagnosis, antibiotic duration, and hospital stay. Study work flow Results A total of 73 patients with EBSI were included with 36 in the pre-phase phase and 37 in the post-phase.Follow-up blood cultures were obtained in 100% of post-phase patients versus 32.4% pre-phase (p < 0.0001), with higher bacteremia clearance (94.4% vs 22%, p < 0.0001) and lower all-cause mortality (36% vs 70.2%, p = 0.0036) and attributable mortality (2.7% vs 27%, p = 0.0039) as shown in table 1. Removable source identification (89% vs 59.4%, p = 0.004) and source control (83.3% vs 38%, p = 0.0001) were significantly better post-phase. Interventions such as abscess drainage (30.5% vs 13.5%, p = 0.08) were more common in post-phase group. Hospital stay was slightly longer in the post-phase (19 vs 17 days, p < 0.05) likely reflecting thorough evaluation and management. Median duration of total antibiotic therapy duration was extended in post phase consistent effective management (14 vs 10 days, p < 0.00000003) as shown in table 2. Conclusion Early ID consultation significantly improved bacteremia clearance, reduced mortality, and enhanced source identification and control in EBSI Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.