Bibliometric analysis of medical malpractice literature in forensic medicine from 2000 to 2024: a scopus-based study

Aims: Forensic medicine, a multidisciplinary field integrating medicine and law, provides an essential framework for examining the evolution of medical malpractice research. Understanding shifts in forensic practices, patterns of institutional collaboration, and emerging research trends is crucial for evaluating developments within the discipline. This study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the global literature on medical malpractice examined within medico-legal and forensic medicine contexts between 2000 and 2024, in order to identify publication trends, citation patterns, collaboration networks, and thematic developments. Methods: Data were retrieved from the Scopus database on October 15, 2025, using the search terms “medical malpractice,” “medical negligence,” “malpractice,” and “forensic medicine.” A total of 189 English-language research articles published between 2000 and 2024 were included. Descriptive analyses and network visualizations were performed using R Bibliometrix and VOSviewer (v1.6.20). Results: An average annual growth rate of 4.3% in publication counts was observed. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine was the most productive journal, while Italy, Turkiye, and China were identified as the leading contributing countries. In institutional collaboration networks, Università degli Studi di Milano and Sapienza Università di Roma held central positions. The Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Turkiye demonstrated the highest connection strength among institutions, reflecting an increase in the country’s research capacity in forensic medicine. The most frequently used keywords were “forensic medicine,” “autopsy,” and “liability.” Conclusion: Medical malpractice research examined within medico-legal and forensic medicine contexts showed a consistent upward trend between 2000 and 2024. European countries continued to occupy central positions in international collaboration networks. Overall, the findings indicate that institutional and interdisciplinary collaboration in forensic medicine research is progressively strengthening worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1823814
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bibliometric analysis of medical malpractice literature in forensic medicine from 2000 to 2024: a scopus-based study

Hızır Aslıyüksek, Aytül Buğra, Filiz Ekim Çevik
Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Bibliometric analysis of medical malpractice literature in forensic medicine from 2000 to 2024: a scopus-based study

Hızır Aslıyüksek, Aytül Buğra, Filiz Ekim Çevik
article en

Abstract

Aims: Forensic medicine, a multidisciplinary field integrating medicine and law, provides an essential framework for examining the evolution of medical malpractice research. Understanding shifts in forensic practices, patterns of institutional collaboration, and emerging research trends is crucial for evaluating developments within the discipline. This study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the global literature on medical malpractice examined within medico-legal and forensic medicine contexts between 2000 and 2024, in order to identify publication trends, citation patterns, collaboration networks, and thematic developments. Methods: Data were retrieved from the Scopus database on October 15, 2025, using the search terms “medical malpractice,” “medical negligence,” “malpractice,” and “forensic medicine.” A total of 189 English-language research articles published between 2000 and 2024 were included. Descriptive analyses and network visualizations were performed using R Bibliometrix and VOSviewer (v1.6.20). Results: An average annual growth rate of 4.3% in publication counts was observed. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine was the most productive journal, while Italy, Turkiye, and China were identified as the leading contributing countries. In institutional collaboration networks, Università degli Studi di Milano and Sapienza Università di Roma held central positions. The Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Turkiye demonstrated the highest connection strength among institutions, reflecting an increase in the country’s research capacity in forensic medicine. The most frequently used keywords were “forensic medicine,” “autopsy,” and “liability.” Conclusion: Medical malpractice research examined within medico-legal and forensic medicine contexts showed a consistent upward trend between 2000 and 2024. European countries continued to occupy central positions in international collaboration networks. Overall, the findings indicate that institutional and interdisciplinary collaboration in forensic medicine research is progressively strengthening worldwide.

Journal of Health Sciences and MedicineVol. 9(1)
Adli Tıp Kurumu (TR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.