230. A Novel SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Virus-Like Particle Vaccine is Highly Potent and Well Tolerated in Adults in a Phase I Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract Background There is a need for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines with improved potency and durability, lower reactogenicity, and broader coverage against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. This ongoing, Phase I, open-label, randomized, active-controlled study examined the safety and immunogenicity of two novel SARS-CoV-2 mRNA virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines encoding Omicron BA.4/5 (AZD9838) and Omicron XBB.1.5 (AZD6563).Figure 1.Reactogenicity-associated adverse reactions by severity in AZD6563 or BNT162b2 recipients aged 18–64 and ≥65 years The number above each bar denotes the percentage of participants reporting the event with any severity. Solicited adverse reactions were collected in a daily eDiary on the day of vaccination (Day 1) through 7 days post-vaccination (Day 8). BNT, BNT162b2.Figure 2.nAb adjusted GMTs against ancestral, Omicron BA.4/5, Omicron XBB.1.5, and Omicron JN.1 in AZD6563 or BNT162b2 recipients aged 18–64 and ≥65 yearsBNT, BNT162b2; GMT, geometric mean titer; nAb, neutralizing antibody. Methods Participants who had natural immunity via previous infection or primary series vaccination with a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were randomized to receive a single intramuscular injection of 5 or 10 μg AZD6563, 5 or 10 μg AZD9838, or 30 µg BNT162b2, a licensed SARS-CoV-2 mRNA XBB.1.5 variant vaccine. Solicited adverse reactions (ARs) were collected through Day 8 and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were collected through Day 29. Serious AEs (SAEs), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), and AEs of special interest (AESIs) were collected through Day 180 at the time of this analysis. Neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers against the ancestral and Omicron variants BA.4/5, XBB.1.5, and JN.1 were measured at baseline, Day 29, and Day 180. All comparisons were descriptive. Results Overall, 166 healthy adults aged 18‒64 years and 76 adults aged ≥ 65 years were vaccinated. AZD9838 and AZD6563 were well tolerated at both dosages, with a lower proportion of injection site pain and muscle aches reported among AZD6563 recipients compared with BNT162b2 (Figure 1). Unsolicited AEs were similar between groups. No related AESIs, MAAEs, or SAEs were reported. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) of the nAbs peaked at Day 29 and remained above baseline at Day 180. Day 29 nAb levels increased with increasing dosages of AZD9838 and AZD6563. In both age groups, 10 μg AZD6563 induced GMTs similar to those observed with 30 μg BNT162b2 at Day 29 and Day 180 (Figure 2). Conclusion Two candidate SARS-CoV-2 mRNA VLP vaccines, AZD9838 and AZD6563, were well tolerated, with fewer ARs reported compared with the licensed COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2. Additionally, 10 μg AZD6563 demonstrated similar immunogenicity to 30 μg BNT162b2, with titers remaining above baseline through Day 180. Disclosures Tope Oyedele, MD, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.082
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

230. A Novel SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Virus-Like Particle Vaccine is Highly Potent and Well Tolerated in Adults in a Phase I Randomized Clinical Trial

Rachel Park, Ann Marie Stanley, J. Lee, Manish Jain et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

230. A Novel SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Virus-Like Particle Vaccine is Highly Potent and Well Tolerated in Adults in a Phase I Randomized Clinical Trial

Rachel Park, Ann Marie Stanley, J. Lee, Manish Jain, Stacey Cromer Berman, Kathryn E. Shoemaker, Apinya Vutikullird, Lawrence Sher, Lee-Jah Chang, Tope Oyedele, Abby Isaacs, Kelly Morales, Thomas Klein, Cindy Handelsman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background There is a need for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines with improved potency and durability, lower reactogenicity, and broader coverage against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. This ongoing, Phase I, open-label, randomized, active-controlled study examined the safety and immunogenicity of two novel SARS-CoV-2 mRNA virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines encoding Omicron BA.4/5 (AZD9838) and Omicron XBB.1.5 (AZD6563).Figure 1.Reactogenicity-associated adverse reactions by severity in AZD6563 or BNT162b2 recipients aged 18–64 and ≥65 years The number above each bar denotes the percentage of participants reporting the event with any severity. Solicited adverse reactions were collected in a daily eDiary on the day of vaccination (Day 1) through 7 days post-vaccination (Day 8). BNT, BNT162b2.Figure 2.nAb adjusted GMTs against ancestral, Omicron BA.4/5, Omicron XBB.1.5, and Omicron JN.1 in AZD6563 or BNT162b2 recipients aged 18–64 and ≥65 yearsBNT, BNT162b2; GMT, geometric mean titer; nAb, neutralizing antibody. Methods Participants who had natural immunity via previous infection or primary series vaccination with a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were randomized to receive a single intramuscular injection of 5 or 10 μg AZD6563, 5 or 10 μg AZD9838, or 30 µg BNT162b2, a licensed SARS-CoV-2 mRNA XBB.1.5 variant vaccine. Solicited adverse reactions (ARs) were collected through Day 8 and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were collected through Day 29. Serious AEs (SAEs), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), and AEs of special interest (AESIs) were collected through Day 180 at the time of this analysis. Neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers against the ancestral and Omicron variants BA.4/5, XBB.1.5, and JN.1 were measured at baseline, Day 29, and Day 180. All comparisons were descriptive. Results Overall, 166 healthy adults aged 18‒64 years and 76 adults aged ≥ 65 years were vaccinated. AZD9838 and AZD6563 were well tolerated at both dosages, with a lower proportion of injection site pain and muscle aches reported among AZD6563 recipients compared with BNT162b2 (Figure 1). Unsolicited AEs were similar between groups. No related AESIs, MAAEs, or SAEs were reported. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) of the nAbs peaked at Day 29 and remained above baseline at Day 180. Day 29 nAb levels increased with increasing dosages of AZD9838 and AZD6563. In both age groups, 10 μg AZD6563 induced GMTs similar to those observed with 30 μg BNT162b2 at Day 29 and Day 180 (Figure 2). Conclusion Two candidate SARS-CoV-2 mRNA VLP vaccines, AZD9838 and AZD6563, were well tolerated, with fewer ARs reported compared with the licensed COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2. Additionally, 10 μg AZD6563 demonstrated similar immunogenicity to 30 μg BNT162b2, with titers remaining above baseline through Day 180. Disclosures Tope Oyedele, MD, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Coastal Carolina University (US), Alliance for Multispecialty Research (United States) (US), AstraZeneca (Netherlands) (NL), The Ark (IE), Peninsula Research (US), Ark Therapeutic (United States) (US), AstraZeneca (Japan) (JP), AstraZeneca (Finland) (FI), AstraZeneca (Canada) (CA), Great Lakes Clinical Trials (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.