P-814. Perceptions of implementing point of care testing for respiratory pathogens in primary care: a qualitative study

Abstract Background Unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in primary care (PC) for patients with upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) remains common. Point of care (POC) testing using an expanded panel of respiratory pathogens has been proposed as a tool to improve antibiotic prescribing in PC. We sought to identify PC clinician and staff perceptions about POC testing for a panel of 14 respiratory pathogens, with a focus on antibiotic stewardship.Table 1.Focus group participant characteristics across five primary care practicesTable 2.Key themes regarding point of care expanded respiratory pathogen testing identified in primary care focus groups with example quotes Methods Five focus groups were conducted between February and March 2025 among five PC practices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Focus group participants were comprised of clinicians and practice staff. Topics included perceptions of POC respiratory pathogen testing for patients with URI symptoms, potential workflows, barriers and facilitators to test implementation. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, cleaned, deidentified, and entered into NVivo 15 software to support coding and analysis. A codebook was developed using an integrated approach including a deductive grounded review of emergent content and deductive coding for a priori implementation domains across transcripts. Two team members double-coded all transcripts (K = 0.93). Results A total of 47 respondents participated across 5 practices (n = 7, 14, 11, 10, 5 by practice); (Table 1). The main perceived potential benefits of POC respiratory pathogen testing included decreased antibiotic prescribing and increased patient satisfaction. Positive impacts on community health knowledge, patient education and communication, treatment plans, and administrative labor were also mentioned (Table 2). Barriers to implementation included concerns regarding cost, workflow and time constraints. Prior implementation of similar testing was identified as the main facilitator in testing adoption. Participants’ main concerns included workflow and responsibilities, test documentation, along with test sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion Perceptions toward respiratory pathogen POC testing in PC patients with URI symptoms were positive, with an anticipated impact on antibiotic prescribing and patient satisfaction. Multiple logistic factors, barriers and facilitators were identified that could impact the success of implementation. Disclosures Keith W. Hamilton, MD, BioMerieux: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1022
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-814. Perceptions of implementing point of care testing for respiratory pathogens in primary care: a qualitative study

Anne Jaskowiak, Keith Hamilton, Peter F. Cronholm, Lauren Dutcher et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

P-814. Perceptions of implementing point of care testing for respiratory pathogens in primary care: a qualitative study

Anne Jaskowiak, Keith Hamilton, Peter F. Cronholm, Lauren Dutcher, Jeffrey H. Millstein, Jeffrey Tokazewski, Lee Yi Ang, Elynna Volkova, Ebbing Lautenbach
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in primary care (PC) for patients with upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) remains common. Point of care (POC) testing using an expanded panel of respiratory pathogens has been proposed as a tool to improve antibiotic prescribing in PC. We sought to identify PC clinician and staff perceptions about POC testing for a panel of 14 respiratory pathogens, with a focus on antibiotic stewardship.Table 1.Focus group participant characteristics across five primary care practicesTable 2.Key themes regarding point of care expanded respiratory pathogen testing identified in primary care focus groups with example quotes Methods Five focus groups were conducted between February and March 2025 among five PC practices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Focus group participants were comprised of clinicians and practice staff. Topics included perceptions of POC respiratory pathogen testing for patients with URI symptoms, potential workflows, barriers and facilitators to test implementation. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, cleaned, deidentified, and entered into NVivo 15 software to support coding and analysis. A codebook was developed using an integrated approach including a deductive grounded review of emergent content and deductive coding for a priori implementation domains across transcripts. Two team members double-coded all transcripts (K = 0.93). Results A total of 47 respondents participated across 5 practices (n = 7, 14, 11, 10, 5 by practice); (Table 1). The main perceived potential benefits of POC respiratory pathogen testing included decreased antibiotic prescribing and increased patient satisfaction. Positive impacts on community health knowledge, patient education and communication, treatment plans, and administrative labor were also mentioned (Table 2). Barriers to implementation included concerns regarding cost, workflow and time constraints. Prior implementation of similar testing was identified as the main facilitator in testing adoption. Participants’ main concerns included workflow and responsibilities, test documentation, along with test sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion Perceptions toward respiratory pathogen POC testing in PC patients with URI symptoms were positive, with an anticipated impact on antibiotic prescribing and patient satisfaction. Multiple logistic factors, barriers and facilitators were identified that could impact the success of implementation. Disclosures Keith W. Hamilton, MD, BioMerieux: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
University of Pennsylvania Health System (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.