P-2108. Clinical Outcome differences in Kidney Transplant Patients Receiving Letermovir Versus Valganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis

Abstract Background CMV is a common herpesvirus that remains latent after initial infection. Adult seroprevalence ranges from 45-100% globally and is higher in transplant recipients (∼62%). CMV threatens immunocompromised patients, especially solid organ transplant recipients. Prophylaxis with valganciclovir or ganciclovir is standard but causes hematologic toxicity. Letermovir, FDA-approved in 2023 for high-risk kidney recipients, showed similar efficacy with fewer side effects. Time to Myelosuppression (days Post-Kidney Transplant)Time to Leukopenia (days Post-Kidney Transplant) Methods This single-center, retrospective chart review at Oregon Health & Science University evaluated adults who underwent kidney transplantation and were prescribed letermovir or valganciclovir for CMV prevention between June 20, 2022, and December 1, 2024. Exclusions included pediatric, pregnant, or VA patients, those who died within six months post-transplant, or did not complete prophylaxis. Data were collected from EPIC and the UNOS database, including demographics, clinical outcomes, and adverse events. The primary outcome was CMV viremia, secondary outcomes included safety and tolerance. Results A total of 62 pt, 21 in letermovir group and 41 in valganciclovir group. Breakthrough CMV viremia within 6 months of kidney transplantation occurred in 1 of 21 patients (4.8%) receiving letermovir prophylaxis compared to 6 of 41 patients (14.6%) receiving valganciclovir. No patients were admitted for CMV related disease or complications. Leukopenia was observed in 24% of patients in the letermovir group versus 57% in the valganciclovir group (p = 0.006), while neutropenia occurred in 39% of letermovir-treated patients compared to 61% of those treated with valganciclovir (p = 0.015). Conclusion Findings from this study are consistent with prior clinical trials demonstrating the non-inferiority of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients. Letermovir showed reduced myelosuppression including leukopenia and neutropenia. In addition, our results seemed to suggest lower rates of breakthrough CMV viremia with letermovir, but no clinically significant CMV disease was observed in either group. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2272
Primary Topic
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2108. Clinical Outcome differences in Kidney Transplant Patients Receiving Letermovir Versus Valganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis

YoungYoon Ham, Ali Olyaei, Ismael Aguirre
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
article

P-2108. Clinical Outcome differences in Kidney Transplant Patients Receiving Letermovir Versus Valganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis

YoungYoon Ham, Ali Olyaei, Ismael Aguirre
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background CMV is a common herpesvirus that remains latent after initial infection. Adult seroprevalence ranges from 45-100% globally and is higher in transplant recipients (∼62%). CMV threatens immunocompromised patients, especially solid organ transplant recipients. Prophylaxis with valganciclovir or ganciclovir is standard but causes hematologic toxicity. Letermovir, FDA-approved in 2023 for high-risk kidney recipients, showed similar efficacy with fewer side effects. Time to Myelosuppression (days Post-Kidney Transplant)Time to Leukopenia (days Post-Kidney Transplant) Methods This single-center, retrospective chart review at Oregon Health & Science University evaluated adults who underwent kidney transplantation and were prescribed letermovir or valganciclovir for CMV prevention between June 20, 2022, and December 1, 2024. Exclusions included pediatric, pregnant, or VA patients, those who died within six months post-transplant, or did not complete prophylaxis. Data were collected from EPIC and the UNOS database, including demographics, clinical outcomes, and adverse events. The primary outcome was CMV viremia, secondary outcomes included safety and tolerance. Results A total of 62 pt, 21 in letermovir group and 41 in valganciclovir group. Breakthrough CMV viremia within 6 months of kidney transplantation occurred in 1 of 21 patients (4.8%) receiving letermovir prophylaxis compared to 6 of 41 patients (14.6%) receiving valganciclovir. No patients were admitted for CMV related disease or complications. Leukopenia was observed in 24% of patients in the letermovir group versus 57% in the valganciclovir group (p = 0.006), while neutropenia occurred in 39% of letermovir-treated patients compared to 61% of those treated with valganciclovir (p = 0.015). Conclusion Findings from this study are consistent with prior clinical trials demonstrating the non-inferiority of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients. Letermovir showed reduced myelosuppression including leukopenia and neutropenia. In addition, our results seemed to suggest lower rates of breakthrough CMV viremia with letermovir, but no clinically significant CMV disease was observed in either group. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.