P-211. Impact of Disparities in Access to Antibiotics on Inferring Burdens of Difficult-to-Treat Antibiotic Resistance: A Real-world Data Analysis and Simulation Study

Abstract Background Global disparities in antibiotic access complicate inferences of antibiotic resistance (AMR) burdens. Difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR), or resistance to all highly safe and effective antibiotics, has clinical relevance and prognostic utility, but assumes these antibiotics are accessible. We propose a “DTR index” which for a pathogen is defined as the percent isolates with no accessible safe and effective antibiotic options in a region over a denominator of total isolates with available antibiotic susceptibility data. We tested how a DTR index changed over time with emergence of newer antibiotics in a real-world cohort of US hospital and across regions with simulated degrees of antibiotic access.Figure 1:Trends in DTR proportion and DTR index following the introduction of new antibiotics* Methods Clinical cultures with Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, or A. baumannii and susceptibility testing to ≥ 1 carbapenem, extended-spectrum cephalosporin, and fluoroquinolone were identified from 339 US hospitals in the PINC-AI healthcare database between 2017-2023. Determinants of the DTR index for each pathogen are provided in Table 1. Pathogen-specific trends in DTR proportion and DTR index were plotted by quarter with introduction of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and cefiderocol. Using microbiologic data in our US derived cohort, we developed 3 hypothetical scenarios to determine changes in the DTR index for Enterobacterales with decreasing antibiotic accessibility.Figure 2:Three hypothetical scenarios for changing Enterobacterales DTR index based on accessible antibiotics^ Results The DTR index for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa remained substantially lower than the estimated DTR proportion between 2017-2023 given the availability of ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam. In contrast, the DTR index for A. baumannii which assumes the value of the estimated DTR proportion until cefiderocol became available at reporting hospitals in 2020 and the DTR index decreases from 35% to nearly 0% (Figure 1). We also demonstrated an increase in the Enterobacterales DTR index in 3 hypothetical scenarios with varying levels of antibiotic accessibility (Figure 2). Conclusion The DTR index offers a practical solution to gauge the effect of new antibiotics and the effect of regional differences in antibiotic access on AMR burdens. Its incorporation might help quantify efforts to improve global antibiotic access. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.433
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-211. Impact of Disparities in Access to Antibiotics on Inferring Burdens of Difficult-to-Treat Antibiotic Resistance: A Real-world Data Analysis and Simulation Study

Sadia Sarzynski, Morgan Walker, Christina Yek, Sameer S Kadri et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

P-211. Impact of Disparities in Access to Antibiotics on Inferring Burdens of Difficult-to-Treat Antibiotic Resistance: A Real-world Data Analysis and Simulation Study

Sadia Sarzynski, Morgan Walker, Christina Yek, Sameer S Kadri, Sarah Warner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Global disparities in antibiotic access complicate inferences of antibiotic resistance (AMR) burdens. Difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR), or resistance to all highly safe and effective antibiotics, has clinical relevance and prognostic utility, but assumes these antibiotics are accessible. We propose a “DTR index” which for a pathogen is defined as the percent isolates with no accessible safe and effective antibiotic options in a region over a denominator of total isolates with available antibiotic susceptibility data. We tested how a DTR index changed over time with emergence of newer antibiotics in a real-world cohort of US hospital and across regions with simulated degrees of antibiotic access.Figure 1:Trends in DTR proportion and DTR index following the introduction of new antibiotics* Methods Clinical cultures with Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, or A. baumannii and susceptibility testing to ≥ 1 carbapenem, extended-spectrum cephalosporin, and fluoroquinolone were identified from 339 US hospitals in the PINC-AI healthcare database between 2017-2023. Determinants of the DTR index for each pathogen are provided in Table 1. Pathogen-specific trends in DTR proportion and DTR index were plotted by quarter with introduction of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and cefiderocol. Using microbiologic data in our US derived cohort, we developed 3 hypothetical scenarios to determine changes in the DTR index for Enterobacterales with decreasing antibiotic accessibility.Figure 2:Three hypothetical scenarios for changing Enterobacterales DTR index based on accessible antibiotics^ Results The DTR index for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa remained substantially lower than the estimated DTR proportion between 2017-2023 given the availability of ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam. In contrast, the DTR index for A. baumannii which assumes the value of the estimated DTR proportion until cefiderocol became available at reporting hospitals in 2020 and the DTR index decreases from 35% to nearly 0% (Figure 1). We also demonstrated an increase in the Enterobacterales DTR index in 3 hypothetical scenarios with varying levels of antibiotic accessibility (Figure 2). Conclusion The DTR index offers a practical solution to gauge the effect of new antibiotics and the effect of regional differences in antibiotic access on AMR burdens. Its incorporation might help quantify efforts to improve global antibiotic access. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
National Institutes of Health (US), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.