Analysis of Learning Objectives Described in University General Education Syllabi

The purpose of this study was to examine the status of learning objectives described in university general education course syllabi and to analyze whether these learning objective statements are appropriate for the purpose of general education. To this end, the learning objectives described in the syllabus of 184 general education courses offered by University A in City G in the first semester of 2024 were analyzed to derive the status of learning objective statements and behavior verbs. The research results are as follows. First, the status of learning objective statements was as follows: 59.2% were ‘sentence type’, 20.1% were ‘bullet style type’, and 20.7% were ‘other statement type. Among the ‘other statement types’, ‘subject outline type’ was the most common at 57.9%, ‘instructor-centered type’ at 10.5%, and ‘mixed type’ stated in the subject outline and instructor language at 31.6%. Second, in the analysis of learning objective behavior verbs, the most frequent verb was ‘understand’, followed by ‘cultivate’, ‘express’, ‘acquire’, ‘explore’, ‘analyze’, ‘understand’, ‘explain’, ‘solve’, ‘apply’, and ‘build’. Also, the general education learning objectives were found to contain many behavior verbs such as ‘appreciate’, ‘empathize’, ‘cultivate’, ‘reflect’, and ‘lead’ which emphasize affective domains. Third, Bloom's analysis of learning objectives also showed that general education reflects the cultivation of affective domain of learning, such as personality, citizenship, and cultural sensitivity in addition to cognitive domains as its educational goals. These results could confirm the current status of university professors' awareness and implementation of the learning objectives stated in the general education course syllabus, and can provide implications for the design and implementation of quality management competency programs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Association of General Education
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2025.19.6.23
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Learning Objectives Described in University General Education Syllabi

Hyunsuk Yoon, Jinyoung Kim, Suna Oh
The Korean Association of General Education
Educational Systems and Policies
article

Analysis of Learning Objectives Described in University General Education Syllabi

Hyunsuk Yoon, Jinyoung Kim, Suna Oh
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the status of learning objectives described in university general education course syllabi and to analyze whether these learning objective statements are appropriate for the purpose of general education. To this end, the learning objectives described in the syllabus of 184 general education courses offered by University A in City G in the first semester of 2024 were analyzed to derive the status of learning objective statements and behavior verbs. The research results are as follows. First, the status of learning objective statements was as follows: 59.2% were ‘sentence type’, 20.1% were ‘bullet style type’, and 20.7% were ‘other statement type. Among the ‘other statement types’, ‘subject outline type’ was the most common at 57.9%, ‘instructor-centered type’ at 10.5%, and ‘mixed type’ stated in the subject outline and instructor language at 31.6%. Second, in the analysis of learning objective behavior verbs, the most frequent verb was ‘understand’, followed by ‘cultivate’, ‘express’, ‘acquire’, ‘explore’, ‘analyze’, ‘understand’, ‘explain’, ‘solve’, ‘apply’, and ‘build’. Also, the general education learning objectives were found to contain many behavior verbs such as ‘appreciate’, ‘empathize’, ‘cultivate’, ‘reflect’, and ‘lead’ which emphasize affective domains. Third, Bloom's analysis of learning objectives also showed that general education reflects the cultivation of affective domain of learning, such as personality, citizenship, and cultural sensitivity in addition to cognitive domains as its educational goals. These results could confirm the current status of university professors' awareness and implementation of the learning objectives stated in the general education course syllabus, and can provide implications for the design and implementation of quality management competency programs.

The Korean Association of General EducationVol. 19(6)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.