Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions < 20 mm: Current Strategies and Emerging Solutions

Gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) < 20 mm are frequently identified during routine endoscopy and account for approximately 90% of all SELs. Although most are benign, a substantial proportion represents gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), which carry malignant potential even at this small size. Histological confirmation is critical for appropriate risk assessment and treatment planning. However, the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is limited for SELs < 20 mm due to technical challenges such as lesion mobility and short needle stroke. Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB), which enables direct visualization and targeted sampling, has emerged as a practical alternative. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on endoscopic diagnostic approaches for SELs < 20 mm, including both sampling methods (EUS-TA, MIAB) and nonsampling techniques such as contrast-enhanced EUS, elastography, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted image analysis. Each modality has distinct advantages and limitations, and selection should be based on lesion characteristics, endoscopist experience, and resource availability. Nonsampling modalities offer complementary information and are expected to become increasingly relevant. A comprehensive understanding of available diagnostic techniques is essential to support accurate clinical decision-making for SELs < 20 mm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digestive Endoscopy
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/den.70079
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions < 20 mm: Current Strategies and Emerging Solutions

Yosuke Minoda, Haruei Ogino, Shuzaburo Nagatomo, Eikichi Ihara et al.
Digestive Endoscopy
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
article

Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions < 20 mm: Current Strategies and Emerging Solutions

Yosuke Minoda, Haruei Ogino, Shuzaburo Nagatomo, Eikichi Ihara, Nao Fujimori
article en

Abstract

Gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) < 20 mm are frequently identified during routine endoscopy and account for approximately 90% of all SELs. Although most are benign, a substantial proportion represents gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), which carry malignant potential even at this small size. Histological confirmation is critical for appropriate risk assessment and treatment planning. However, the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is limited for SELs < 20 mm due to technical challenges such as lesion mobility and short needle stroke. Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB), which enables direct visualization and targeted sampling, has emerged as a practical alternative. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on endoscopic diagnostic approaches for SELs < 20 mm, including both sampling methods (EUS-TA, MIAB) and nonsampling techniques such as contrast-enhanced EUS, elastography, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted image analysis. Each modality has distinct advantages and limitations, and selection should be based on lesion characteristics, endoscopist experience, and resource availability. Nonsampling modalities offer complementary information and are expected to become increasingly relevant. A comprehensive understanding of available diagnostic techniques is essential to support accurate clinical decision-making for SELs < 20 mm.

Digestive EndoscopyVol. 38(1)
Kyushu University (JP), Kyushu University Hospital (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.