P-137. Optimizing Endocarditis Risk Assessment: Validation of the HANDOC Score for Non-Beta Hemolytic Streptococcal Bacteremia in a Mixed Practice Hospital Setting

Abstract Background Non-β-hemolytic streptococci (NBHS) bacteremia is a cause of infective endocarditis (IE). The Duke criteria, while imperfect, are a cornerstone of standardization for the definition and diagnosis of IE. It is unfeasible to obtain a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) on all NBHS bacteremic patients; The HANDOC score is a tool to identify patients at low risk of IE unlikely to need TEE, but its validation across patient populations is limited (Fig 1). We aimed to validate the HANDOC score in a hospital system with a mixed practice of academic and private groups and no dedicated IE team. Methods This retrospective study enrolled all patients with NBHS bacteremia admitted to a safety net hospital system in Detroit, MI from 1/2021-10/2024. IE was defined per 2023 modified Duke Criteria for definite IE. Clinical and microbiologic characteristics were collected. Patients were excluded if NBHS was a suspected contaminant, NBHS did not grow on culture, or if they expired or left against medical advice (Fig 2). Results 371 patients were included (63 with IE, and 308 without IE). IE patients were older with higher rates of cardiac conditions and drug use (Table 1). Sepsis parameters were similar between groups. The most common Duke criteria met for IE diagnosis was 2 major criteria (78%). Valve pathology was present in 11%. HANDOC score > 2 occurred in 73 patients (32 with IE, 41 without). The "H," "N," and Bovis group parameters were higher in the IE group, while community onset and other NBHS species were similar across groups. The HANDOC score had a NPV of 90% and specificity of 82% but a lower PPV and sensitivity (Table 2). Conclusion Diagnostic stewardship in IE is challenging due to the limitations of the Duke criteria and lack of dedicated IE team in most hospital systems. A HANDOC score < 2 can be used by clinicians to safely forego the need for an echocardiogram in NBHS, thereby decreasing resource use and unnecessary invasive testing. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.364
Primary Topic
Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-137. Optimizing Endocarditis Risk Assessment: Validation of the HANDOC Score for Non-Beta Hemolytic Streptococcal Bacteremia in a Mixed Practice Hospital Setting

Anisha R. Pareddy, America Silva, Alex L. Huang, Hussein Tehaili et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
article

P-137. Optimizing Endocarditis Risk Assessment: Validation of the HANDOC Score for Non-Beta Hemolytic Streptococcal Bacteremia in a Mixed Practice Hospital Setting

Anisha R. Pareddy, America Silva, Alex L. Huang, Hussein Tehaili, Bourann Husainy, Brianna P. Desa, Mohamed O. Elhussain, Vaishnavi Sirekulam, Perani V Chander, Ahmad Kofahi, Mazhar Shapoo, Matthew T Brennan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Non-β-hemolytic streptococci (NBHS) bacteremia is a cause of infective endocarditis (IE). The Duke criteria, while imperfect, are a cornerstone of standardization for the definition and diagnosis of IE. It is unfeasible to obtain a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) on all NBHS bacteremic patients; The HANDOC score is a tool to identify patients at low risk of IE unlikely to need TEE, but its validation across patient populations is limited (Fig 1). We aimed to validate the HANDOC score in a hospital system with a mixed practice of academic and private groups and no dedicated IE team. Methods This retrospective study enrolled all patients with NBHS bacteremia admitted to a safety net hospital system in Detroit, MI from 1/2021-10/2024. IE was defined per 2023 modified Duke Criteria for definite IE. Clinical and microbiologic characteristics were collected. Patients were excluded if NBHS was a suspected contaminant, NBHS did not grow on culture, or if they expired or left against medical advice (Fig 2). Results 371 patients were included (63 with IE, and 308 without IE). IE patients were older with higher rates of cardiac conditions and drug use (Table 1). Sepsis parameters were similar between groups. The most common Duke criteria met for IE diagnosis was 2 major criteria (78%). Valve pathology was present in 11%. HANDOC score > 2 occurred in 73 patients (32 with IE, 41 without). The "H," "N," and Bovis group parameters were higher in the IE group, while community onset and other NBHS species were similar across groups. The HANDOC score had a NPV of 90% and specificity of 82% but a lower PPV and sensitivity (Table 2). Conclusion Diagnostic stewardship in IE is challenging due to the limitations of the Duke criteria and lack of dedicated IE team in most hospital systems. A HANDOC score < 2 can be used by clinicians to safely forego the need for an echocardiogram in NBHS, thereby decreasing resource use and unnecessary invasive testing. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Wayne State University (US), Detroit Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.