P-1877. Impact of Consultation Type on 30-Day Survival in Patients with Candidemia: Formal versus Automated Infectious Disease Consultation

Abstract Background Infectious disease (ID) consultation in candidemia has been associated with reduced mortality. This study evaluated 30-day survival based on the type of ID consultation: formal consultation and automated consultation linked to restricted antimicrobial prescriptions.Overall 30-day survival rates among patients without consultation, with automatic consultation, and with formal consultation Methods Adult patients with candidemia at Samsung Changwon Hospital (Jan 2015–Mar 2024) were included. Those who died within three days or had polymicrobial blood stream infection were excluded. Patients were grouped as: no consultation (No-consult), automated consultation (Auto-consult), and formal consultation (Formal-consult). Consultations within one week of candidemia onset were included. Automated consultation was triggered by prescribing restricted agents (echinocandins, glycopeptides, or carbapenems) and conducted via electronic records without bedside assessment. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes included appropriate antifungal use, follow-up cultures, source control, echocardiography, and ophthalmologic examination. Results Among 262 patients, 118, 46, and 98 were in the No-, Auto-, and Formal-consult groups, respectively. Thirty-day survival was 53.2%, 61.4%, and 71.4% (P=0.024). This difference remained after adjustment, with significance only in the Formal-consult group (Auto-consult: HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.48–1.46; Formal-consult: HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33–0.85). Significant differences were found in appropriate antifungal use (79.7%, 95.7%, 93.9%; P=0.001), follow-up cultures (66.9%, 91.3%, 95.9%; P< 0.001), and ophthalmologic exams (23.7%, 47.8%, 66.3%; P< 0.001). Fluconazole use was higher in the No-consult group (78.5%, 57.1%, 51.1%; P=0.001). Conclusion Formal ID consultation was associated with improved 30-day survival in candidemia. Although a survival benefit was suggested in the automated consultation group, it did not reach statistical significance, indicating the need for additional strategies to enhance its effectiveness, particularly in resource-limited settings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2046
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1877. Impact of Consultation Type on 30-Day Survival in Patients with Candidemia: Formal versus Automated Infectious Disease Consultation

Siho Kim, Yu Mi Wi, Cheon Hoo Jeon
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

P-1877. Impact of Consultation Type on 30-Day Survival in Patients with Candidemia: Formal versus Automated Infectious Disease Consultation

Siho Kim, Yu Mi Wi, Cheon Hoo Jeon
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Infectious disease (ID) consultation in candidemia has been associated with reduced mortality. This study evaluated 30-day survival based on the type of ID consultation: formal consultation and automated consultation linked to restricted antimicrobial prescriptions.Overall 30-day survival rates among patients without consultation, with automatic consultation, and with formal consultation Methods Adult patients with candidemia at Samsung Changwon Hospital (Jan 2015–Mar 2024) were included. Those who died within three days or had polymicrobial blood stream infection were excluded. Patients were grouped as: no consultation (No-consult), automated consultation (Auto-consult), and formal consultation (Formal-consult). Consultations within one week of candidemia onset were included. Automated consultation was triggered by prescribing restricted agents (echinocandins, glycopeptides, or carbapenems) and conducted via electronic records without bedside assessment. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes included appropriate antifungal use, follow-up cultures, source control, echocardiography, and ophthalmologic examination. Results Among 262 patients, 118, 46, and 98 were in the No-, Auto-, and Formal-consult groups, respectively. Thirty-day survival was 53.2%, 61.4%, and 71.4% (P=0.024). This difference remained after adjustment, with significance only in the Formal-consult group (Auto-consult: HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.48–1.46; Formal-consult: HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33–0.85). Significant differences were found in appropriate antifungal use (79.7%, 95.7%, 93.9%; P=0.001), follow-up cultures (66.9%, 91.3%, 95.9%; P< 0.001), and ophthalmologic exams (23.7%, 47.8%, 66.3%; P< 0.001). Fluconazole use was higher in the No-consult group (78.5%, 57.1%, 51.1%; P=0.001). Conclusion Formal ID consultation was associated with improved 30-day survival in candidemia. Although a survival benefit was suggested in the automated consultation group, it did not reach statistical significance, indicating the need for additional strategies to enhance its effectiveness, particularly in resource-limited settings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Changwon National University (KR), Samsung (South Korea) (KR), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Samsung Changwon Hospital (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.