P-1372. Text Message Contact Tracing Intervention for Tuberculosis Screening in South Africa: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (TB) contact tracing identifies and refers individuals exposed to TB for screening. Notification methods include phone calls, clinic referral cards, and text messages. We evaluated whether offering a text message notification option could increase the proportion of contacts presenting for TB screening in South Africa. Methods We performed a cluster-randomized trial at 29 primary care clinics in 3 provinces of South Africa from October 2019 to March 2020, nested in the Targeted Universal Testing for TB (TUTT) trial. Clinics were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to: (i) offer index patients two options of text message notifications—sent from their own mobile device or by clinic staff—as an additional or alternative method to clinic referral cards (intervention), or (ii) provide clinic referral cards only (control) to notify contacts. The primary outcome was the cluster-level proportion of contacts presenting for TB screening. Results A total of 620 index patients diagnosed with TB (56.9% male; median age 36) identified 2,058 close contacts (median 3.0 per index; IQR 1.5-5.0). Of the 505 index patients in the intervention arm, 302 (59.8%) exclusively used clinic referral cards to notify contacts; 97 (19.2%) had clinic staff send the contact message; 70 (13.8%) used text messages from clinic staff and clinic referral cards; 3 (0.6%) sent text messages from their personal devices. Preferred method of notification did not vary significantly by age group (P=0.264, Chi square). In the 18 intervention group clinics, 10.2% (168/1653) of contacts presented for screening across all methods of referral, compared to 9.6% (39/405) of contacts in the 11 control group clinics (P=0.749, Z test). In the intervention arm, 1275 clinic referral cards and 378 text messages were distributed, of which 12.2% (155/1275) and 3.4% (13/378) were, respectively, reported to have been received by contacts presenting for screening (P< 0.001, Z test). Conclusion Augmenting clinic referral cards with a text message option did not affect the proportion of contacts presenting for TB screening in a high-prevalence setting. Clinic referral cards, which were preferred by index patients with TB and attracted more contacts than text messages, should be implemented as an inexpensive method to bring contacts for assessment. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1559
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1372. Text Message Contact Tracing Intervention for Tuberculosis Screening in South Africa: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Minja Milovanovic, Bareng A. S. Nonyane, Limakatso Lebina, Khuthadzo Hlongwane et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

P-1372. Text Message Contact Tracing Intervention for Tuberculosis Screening in South Africa: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Minja Milovanovic, Bareng A. S. Nonyane, Limakatso Lebina, Khuthadzo Hlongwane, Leisha Genade, Neil Alexander Martinson, Colin H. McLeish, Floris J C Swanepoel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (TB) contact tracing identifies and refers individuals exposed to TB for screening. Notification methods include phone calls, clinic referral cards, and text messages. We evaluated whether offering a text message notification option could increase the proportion of contacts presenting for TB screening in South Africa. Methods We performed a cluster-randomized trial at 29 primary care clinics in 3 provinces of South Africa from October 2019 to March 2020, nested in the Targeted Universal Testing for TB (TUTT) trial. Clinics were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to: (i) offer index patients two options of text message notifications—sent from their own mobile device or by clinic staff—as an additional or alternative method to clinic referral cards (intervention), or (ii) provide clinic referral cards only (control) to notify contacts. The primary outcome was the cluster-level proportion of contacts presenting for TB screening. Results A total of 620 index patients diagnosed with TB (56.9% male; median age 36) identified 2,058 close contacts (median 3.0 per index; IQR 1.5-5.0). Of the 505 index patients in the intervention arm, 302 (59.8%) exclusively used clinic referral cards to notify contacts; 97 (19.2%) had clinic staff send the contact message; 70 (13.8%) used text messages from clinic staff and clinic referral cards; 3 (0.6%) sent text messages from their personal devices. Preferred method of notification did not vary significantly by age group (P=0.264, Chi square). In the 18 intervention group clinics, 10.2% (168/1653) of contacts presented for screening across all methods of referral, compared to 9.6% (39/405) of contacts in the 11 control group clinics (P=0.749, Z test). In the intervention arm, 1275 clinic referral cards and 378 text messages were distributed, of which 12.2% (155/1275) and 3.4% (13/378) were, respectively, reported to have been received by contacts presenting for screening (P< 0.001, Z test). Conclusion Augmenting clinic referral cards with a text message option did not affect the proportion of contacts presenting for TB screening in a high-prevalence setting. Clinic referral cards, which were preferred by index patients with TB and attracted more contacts than text messages, should be implemented as an inexpensive method to bring contacts for assessment. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Africa Health Research Institute (ZA), African Explosives (South Africa) (ZA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.