Quality Evaluation of Galbitang according to Changes in Licorice Powder Concentration

This study was conducted to find the optimal mixing ratio of Galbitang and to create data on Galbitang products by using powdered licorice needed for making galbitang. Since licorice has a strong sweetness, adding too much can ruin the taste of galbitang, so the control group did not add licorice, and the samples were made by dividing the licorice content into 5 g, 10 g, 15 g, and 20 g. The crude fat content of the meat of galbitang was confirmed to increase with the addition of licorice powder, and the moisture content of the meat did not change with the addition of licorice powder. The reducing sugar value of the galbitang broth was confirmed to increase as the amount of licorice powder added increased, and the control group was the lowest at 0.07, and GBT20 was the highest at 0.19. It is judged that the sweetness of galbitang increased due to the glycyrrhizin contained in licorice. The pH of the meat and broth of the galbitang gradually decreased as licorice powder was added. This is thought to be because the licorice powder neutralizes when mixed with other ingredients, causing a decrease. There was a significant difference in the total polyphenol content of the meat and broth of the galbitang depending on the amount added, but the value was judged to be very small. In the preference evaluation of the galbitang, CON and GBT5 received the highest preference. In other words, it is judged to be the best for consumers when licorice powder is added in an appropriate amount.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2025.31.12.006
Primary Topic
Food Quality and Safety Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality Evaluation of Galbitang according to Changes in Licorice Powder Concentration

Ye-Chan Kim, Seung-Seok Yoo
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
Food Quality and Safety Studies
article

Quality Evaluation of Galbitang according to Changes in Licorice Powder Concentration

Ye-Chan Kim, Seung-Seok Yoo
article en

Abstract

This study was conducted to find the optimal mixing ratio of Galbitang and to create data on Galbitang products by using powdered licorice needed for making galbitang. Since licorice has a strong sweetness, adding too much can ruin the taste of galbitang, so the control group did not add licorice, and the samples were made by dividing the licorice content into 5 g, 10 g, 15 g, and 20 g. The crude fat content of the meat of galbitang was confirmed to increase with the addition of licorice powder, and the moisture content of the meat did not change with the addition of licorice powder. The reducing sugar value of the galbitang broth was confirmed to increase as the amount of licorice powder added increased, and the control group was the lowest at 0.07, and GBT20 was the highest at 0.19. It is judged that the sweetness of galbitang increased due to the glycyrrhizin contained in licorice. The pH of the meat and broth of the galbitang gradually decreased as licorice powder was added. This is thought to be because the licorice powder neutralizes when mixed with other ingredients, causing a decrease. There was a significant difference in the total polyphenol content of the meat and broth of the galbitang depending on the amount added, but the value was judged to be very small. In the preference evaluation of the galbitang, CON and GBT5 received the highest preference. In other words, it is judged to be the best for consumers when licorice powder is added in an appropriate amount.

Culinary Science & Hospitality ResearchVol. 31(12)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Food Quality and Safety Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.