P-2086. Knowledge of Antimicrobial Resistance and Acceptability of Anal Swab Screening: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study in the General Population and Healthcare Personnel in Argentina

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health priority. In Argentina, limited data are available regarding public awareness of AMR, as well as the acceptability of specific preventive interventions, such as anal swab (AS) screening. We aimed to assess knowledge and perception of AMR in the general population (GP) and to compare the acceptability of AS between the GP and healthcare workers (HCW) and medical students (MS). Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study in the third trimester of 2023 in Santa Fe, Argentina. In Phase 1, an adaptation of the WHO surveys on AMR was administered to the GP during the national presidential elections. In Phase 2, surveys were distributed to MS and HCW in diverse clinical settings. Chi2 and Mann-Whitney’s U test were used for univariate analysis. Variables with a p< 0.05 were included in logistic regression models to predict both AMR knowledge and AS acceptability. Results We collected 588 surveys from the GP (Figure 1) and 544 from HCW (28.3% nurses and 23.9% physicians) and MS. In the GP, the median age was 39 years (IQR 27.0–53.8), and 61.1% were female. Most participants (86.8%) identified as middle or lower-middle socioeconomic class. While 46.8% had heard of AMR, only 77.9% of those individuals understood the concept. Knowledge esa high in 30.6%. Factors associated with knowledge in these patients are shown in Table 1. HCW and MS showed lower acceptability of AS compared to the GP, primarily due to lower scores among MS [8 (IQR 6–9) vs. 10 (IQR 7–10); p=0.001]. Factors associated with AS acceptability are shown in Table 2. Among GP, 39.5% thought that AS would be embarrassing for patients, while this was more frequent among physicians (64.6%), nurses (75.3%) and MS (83.9%) (p< 0.001). Self-swabbing was considered acceptable by 35.9% of the GP, compared to 56.2–57.8% of physicians and nurses, and 75.5% of MS (p< 0.001). Conclusion Knowledge about AMR in the GP was low to moderate; however, when provided with basic information, the acceptability of AS as a screening measure was high, with a preference for the procedure to be performed by HCW. Among HCW and MS, misconceptions represented barriers to AS implementation. This study contributes to the limited available evidence on the acceptability of infection control measures in both community and clinical settings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2250
Primary Topic
Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2086. Knowledge of Antimicrobial Resistance and Acceptability of Anal Swab Screening: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study in the General Population and Healthcare Personnel in Argentina

Federico Rafael Galluccio, Melina Beloso, Agustı́n Albillos, Héctor Mario Musacchio et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Neonatal and Maternal Infections
article

P-2086. Knowledge of Antimicrobial Resistance and Acceptability of Anal Swab Screening: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study in the General Population and Healthcare Personnel in Argentina

Federico Rafael Galluccio, Melina Beloso, Agustı́n Albillos, Héctor Mario Musacchio, Luciano Priotti, Virginia Heinzmann Dotti, Evangelina Echeverria, Joaquín Portillo, Ana Paula Amato, Adriel Martínez, María José Sadonio, Agostina Audicio Schmidt, Bianca Molaro
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health priority. In Argentina, limited data are available regarding public awareness of AMR, as well as the acceptability of specific preventive interventions, such as anal swab (AS) screening. We aimed to assess knowledge and perception of AMR in the general population (GP) and to compare the acceptability of AS between the GP and healthcare workers (HCW) and medical students (MS). Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study in the third trimester of 2023 in Santa Fe, Argentina. In Phase 1, an adaptation of the WHO surveys on AMR was administered to the GP during the national presidential elections. In Phase 2, surveys were distributed to MS and HCW in diverse clinical settings. Chi2 and Mann-Whitney’s U test were used for univariate analysis. Variables with a p< 0.05 were included in logistic regression models to predict both AMR knowledge and AS acceptability. Results We collected 588 surveys from the GP (Figure 1) and 544 from HCW (28.3% nurses and 23.9% physicians) and MS. In the GP, the median age was 39 years (IQR 27.0–53.8), and 61.1% were female. Most participants (86.8%) identified as middle or lower-middle socioeconomic class. While 46.8% had heard of AMR, only 77.9% of those individuals understood the concept. Knowledge esa high in 30.6%. Factors associated with knowledge in these patients are shown in Table 1. HCW and MS showed lower acceptability of AS compared to the GP, primarily due to lower scores among MS [8 (IQR 6–9) vs. 10 (IQR 7–10); p=0.001]. Factors associated with AS acceptability are shown in Table 2. Among GP, 39.5% thought that AS would be embarrassing for patients, while this was more frequent among physicians (64.6%), nurses (75.3%) and MS (83.9%) (p< 0.001). Self-swabbing was considered acceptable by 35.9% of the GP, compared to 56.2–57.8% of physicians and nurses, and 75.5% of MS (p< 0.001). Conclusion Knowledge about AMR in the GP was low to moderate; however, when provided with basic information, the acceptability of AS as a screening measure was high, with a preference for the procedure to be performed by HCW. Among HCW and MS, misconceptions represented barriers to AS implementation. This study contributes to the limited available evidence on the acceptability of infection control measures in both community and clinical settings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Santa Fe Institute (US), Universidad Nacional del Litoral (AR), Centro Científico Tecnológico - Santa Fe (AR), Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Neonatal and Maternal Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.